I couldn't care less about the processors. I care about the operating-systems. Catalina represented a clear and unnecessary night-of-the-long-knives memoryholing of over a decade's worth of useful 32bit software undertaken solely for the spite of it not being subscription-model (yeah, I know there are plenty of other cover excuses).
The last thing I do to a "noob" is tell them to blow $2,499 on a computer when they haven't the least clue what they
really need.
Per Apple druthers,
everything is
"well on its way to the past", as that is the definition of artificial-obsolescence. That $2,499 metal box will depreciate in value faster than Cybertruck (well, maybe not
that fast). Per WarGames, the only winning move is not to play, unless you absolutely need that box's found-nowhere-else capabilities
right *now* to earn income. I.e., you're a studio with render project stacked up around the clock.
A computer is a tool, and most tasks that a computer can do for a human were largely "solved" at least a decade ago. Nobody will ever need 8K video at 120fps anymore than they need 300mph cars, and new architecture is running out of selling-points. Closed systems running on what is essentially overpriced jewelry at this point are
very niche, and I frankly don't see how Apple can keep it up much longer. (I.e., it's not going to be able to coast forever on people replacing their sluggified iPhones every three years.) Word is out: the "new" MacOSes, like Windows11, are data-harvesting stank that actively thwart the user.
View attachment 2398809