I think this is basically how rolexes used to be perceived - just a nice watch that tells time well (at a high-but-not-too-unreasonable price).Interesting comments about Rolex. As it happens, the only two watches I've owned as an adult (I'm in my mid-60s) are an AW6 and ... a Rolex. I'm fairly sure that people have evaluated me at least partially based on the fact that I've had a Rolex on my wrist. Or now, frankly, that I have an AW6 on my wrist. Usually with the Rolex those assumptions (there's that word) are in the general quadrant of elitism, class, wealth, etc. Why else would I have a Rolex?
As it happens, I won the Rolex in a contest, which I entered on a whim because it seemed like an interesting thing to do. I had no expectations of winning; in fact, I probably had clear expectations of NOT winning. And while I didn't buy it per se, I was pretty horrified by the increase in my tax bill the next April 15th, since it ended up counting as income.
To me, the watch has been a way to tell time. To many others, it's a marker of class, wealth, social standing, and probably half a dozen other things that I don't even perceive.
Frankly, tech stuff is like this too, although probably in different quarters and in different ways.
Would depend on the Rolex as well. Consider the Submariner is a divers watch and has real military applications. Even a Jager Reverso was originally intended to be a sports watch.I think this is basically how rolexes used to be perceived - just a nice watch that tells time well (at a high-but-not-too-unreasonable price).
I think the crazy jump in status and hype associated with the brand is a relatively new thing? Spurred, I suspect, by their relatively new status as objects of financial speculation, which brings intense cultural dynamics to the table.
We are all moronic. I'm not like this with phones but with other things. I like status items nobody cares about, which totally defeats the purpose. I bought a Sound Devices Mixpre 10ii instead of a Zoom F8n; in a blind test I would not be able to pick them apart. In Sweden the cost difference is like 800 dollars. My SD has worked flawlessly for several years now, but so would probably the Zoom. It has analog limiters, but it was more desire that persuaded me.Some are taking this as "do you feel the pressure to not hang on to an old phone", rather than "do you feel the pressure to buy a Pro device even if that's not the one you want, for the sake of status".
Put it this way...
If I had say, a 12 Pro or 13 Pro (even though I prefer the mini), I'd feel I wasn't being judged, but if I had a 12 mini or 13 mini, or the standard (non-Pro) 13, others would think - "can he not afford a Pro?", "don't you prefer the Pro?", "the 13 Pro is a cooler, more premium phone" etc.
So I feel that pressure to buy a 12 Pro, 13 Pro or even the new 14 Pro for status/credibility - even though I'm perfectly happy with my 13 mini.
Even on this forum - why do so many people favour the Pro models over the non-Pro or mini? Seems like 80% of people on here have a Pro or Pro Max.
I know it sounds moronic, but it does cross my mind despite knowing it shouldn't.
I used to have an iPhone 7, but recently got the 12mini. I think a mini iPhone is not a bad choice and having the 13 mini isn't bad at all. All my friends have a mini phone.Probably the most materialistic post I've ever made. It's going to sound a little silly but it's been on my mind for a little while and thought I'd see if anyone else feels similarly. Hear me out.
Does anyone else feel the pressure to have either the latest device, or at the very least a 'Pro' phone?
I have a 13 mini and it ticks so many boxes - small, practical, can be used one handed, light, good battery etc. It really works for me in a lot of ways.
But I always feel I'm 'missing out' on not having a Pro phone, even though I wouldn't use any of the additional features. Sure, 120hz, a better battery and a bigger screen are all nice things, but I definitely don't need them.
It's more the status of having a 'Pro' phone.
Even though it would be so awkward for me - the weight, the bulk with a case, the need for two hands, and the price premium - for some reason I still feel I 'need' one.
Is it an image thing? Do I sub-consciously think that people will think less of me because I have a 13 mini instead of a Pro? Am I thinking they're wondering whether I can't afford a more expensive phone rather than it being a choice? To be blunt, are non-Pro phones viewed as less "cool"? (ugh I feel so old putting the word cool in quotations).
I know come September, even though the 13 mini is fine, I'll still be thinking I need to buy the 14 Pro because it's the latest phone.
I know none of this should matter, it's materialistic, and most people couldn't care less, but why do I still think that way?
same problem for me. I will be going back to a pro because I want zoom and better battery life...other then that mini was everything I wanted.Still using an Xs, so not really.
I do love the zoom lens though, so as much as I’d prefer the 13 Mini, when it comes time to upgrade (possibly this upcoming cycle) I’ll probably go for a 14 Pro, for the camera & stainless steel (more durable without a case).
But if you don’t care about the zoom lens, the 13 Mini is a wonderful phone!
I didn't catch that at first. I think that is a good idea to have the lower cost for a 6.7" modelNot this time around with how much prices for needs have shot up. Although, at least this time you don't have to go Pro to get the largest screen.
Wasnt recently in Las Vegas was she?Sometimes there are practical considerations to take into account, for example. My wife recently came across an Apple Pencil 2nd Gen for free. She was disappointed to find that it would not work with her new iPad 9 because it requires iPad Pro or iPad Air 5th Gen.😔