Whats the point of putting in a Graphics Processing Unit into a monitor that does no actual processing? So the old GPU in the macbook/imac/MP.. can be bandwidth handicapped by handing off to another device? Why not have the monitor mine for bitcoins so it can get even less FPS out of the media you view on it. The calculation of what colour a pixel should be on a screen can be incredibly involved and gets more and more complex every year. I don't see how you could ever have a GPU that can never be outdated unless you are only displaying spreadsheets on it.
I know what's the point of having GPU (for normal user), but I was talking about how Apple may handle the eGPU inside the possible new 5k display.
The eGPU may be just a very weak one (of course, they will charge you premium price), and only be used to drive 5k pixels internally. Therefore, the older Mac, or the Mac that only has iGPU can still use the 5k display (smoothly for system UI, Safari, spreadsheets…).
If it's just a "controller" of the 5k display, how can it be outdated?
I know lots of us want to have eGPU for other stuff. However, we should not expect Apple will do whatever we want. They may do anything exactly the other way around.
And guess what? Most of the MacBook users may be very happy about it. They may not even know there is a eGPU inside the display. And they will be surprised how powerful their MacBook that can drive a 5K display via the USB-C port.
Apple abundant the real Pro for some time already. I won't be surprised if they release a 5k display that can connect to the iPad Pro, but not the Mac Pro.