I think they wont. The port will be there at least 5 more years. Youll see.I think Apple will just remove the charging port all together.
I think they wont. The port will be there at least 5 more years. Youll see.I think Apple will just remove the charging port all together.
Well your current devices aren't affected by a future legislation, but in the future there will be USB-C for these typical devices and gadgets.This just makes no sense to me. There will still be a mix of charge types in our household
More like: let Apple eat turds and finally make USB-C iPhone and AirPods. An actual pro-consumer move, unlike your proposal. And yes, people will pick another thing to complain about. But isn't it what MR forums are mostly for ? (apart from defending Apple with life)
So... Only two years after the EU regulation goes into affect. Seems like a waste.I think they wont. The port will be there at least 5 more years. Youll see.
No idea why you're so afraid of that. USB-C is just the shape of the connector and thus far USB is pretty good at backwards compatibility. And I'm sure if a better connector comes along the market can talk with the EU to sanction that as the next best thing.Terrible news. This will stifle innovation and competition. For example, it will limit the desire to create connectors that are more efficient, faster, cheaper, easier to use than USB-C.
They won’t. I guarantee iPhone 15 will be Lightning.Excellent news. Lets hope Apple go usb-c next year instead of waiting until the last minute.
Any devices release before the end of 2024 are exempt. Laptops release before spring 2026 are exempt.Products released before the "date of application" will continue to be exempt? Is the date of application the date the EU applied to the commission? Or the date the legislation starts? I hope this doesn't mean we get two more years of iPhone releases with lightning....
Waiting for a standards body to decide on "something better" necessarily stifles innovation. As does taking the profit motive out of developing "something better."For anyone saying this stifles innovation... no, this isn't in force for the rest of time. It will be continually reassessed so that when something better comes along we can all switch to that. It's 100% the right thing to do, and stops the nightmare that has been endless different charging cables during the course of my four decades on Earth.
It appears to mandate that phones must have a charging port. I hope that appears in the final published legislation.I actually think Apple will react by removing the port altogether and focus improving wireless charging. Does the EU mandate state it has to have a charging port?
The other article I read suggested that fair warning is given from date of publication- eg next month. That gives companies two years to sort their **** out. Products are only exempt if they are released before publication next month.Any devices release before the end of 2024 are exempt. Laptops release before spring 2026 are exempt.
Nope. It only applies to devices "that are rechargeable via a wired cable".It appears to mandate that phones must have a charging port. I hope that appears in the final published legislation.
That's silly. Products can't be redesigned in a month. Like I said, it only applies to products released after the end of 2024.The other article I read suggested that fair warning is given from date of publication- eg next month. That gives companies two years to sort their **** out. Products are only exempt if they are released before publication next month.
The micro, mini, usb a and c and lightning cables on my desk would like to have a word.
So outlaw all existing ports except USB C? I'd have been fine with that. However, problems may occur if new cheap proprietary ports started popping up on cheap stuff coming from Asia, thus undermining the intentions of the law. There isn't a perfect solution.Waiting for a standards body to decide on "something better" necessarily stifles innovation. As does taking the profit motive out of developing "something better."
I think the best thing the EU could have done was simply outlaw older USB connectors on new devices. That would have fixed problems without stifling innovation.
Why is that silly? They get to sell their stuff for two and a bit years before a minor redesign is required... which company couldn't do that?That's silly. Products can't be redesigned in a month. Like I said, it only applies to products released after the end of 2024.
Not quite, I suggested outlawing all existing USB ports except USB-C on new devices. I think it's unlikely a non-USB port out of Asia would find a significant foothold in the EU. It would require massive support from third parties that you aren't going to get around cheap, inferior products.So outlaw all existing ports except USB C? I'd have been fine with that. However, problems may occur if new cheap proprietary ports started popping up on cheap stuff coming from Asia, thus undermining the intentions of the law. There isn't a perfect solution.
It says that you can not sell phones without USB-C charge connection from late 2024 and onwards.
I can totally see this happening, Apple using this excuse to push out some nonsense with a new Lightning port rather than adopting the logical standard.
The Directive will only affect devices released going forward, so won't do anything about your current cables. And everything is already moving in this direction—even disposable vapes now have USB-C.
Not necessarily. Nothing I saw said they cannot extend their tech as long as it also can use a standard wireless charging capability. So you could have standard + MagSafe implementations.Wireless charging will also need to be working across different brands so no MagSafe
This is literally going to create mountains of electronic waste overnight. Apple sells iPhones in the tens of millions upon release, and almost every one of those buyers will have multiple lightning cables. Metric tons of e-waste, and for what? The EU to flex its muscles?MEPs claim that the move will reduce electronic waste