It doesn't work anyway because it only moves the Windows a little. They still overlap. I posted a screenshot earlier.
Oops, I missed that.
Ugh, worthless. This is one of the major reasons I haven't updated any of my computers to Lion.
It doesn't work anyway because it only moves the Windows a little. They still overlap. I posted a screenshot earlier.
well there goes my hope of installing Mountain Lion
Why not? Will Apple send us a mysterious firmware update that nukes it? Will all the apps currently on my SL system suddenly stop working the day ML is released?I wish you luck but I don't expect you'll be able to hold on to Snow Leopard for much longer.
Why not? Will Apple send us a mysterious firmware update that nukes it? Will all the apps currently on my SL system suddenly stop working the day ML is released?
And this folks... pretty much sums up Lion. (And OS X in general from this day forward).Of the people I know using Mac's, only one person liked the changes of Lion overall (my dad, basically computer illeterate)
thank god they didnt bring it back, i may be in the minority but i never used spaces before lion. its so neat to simply swipe left and right
Also, you can add me to the list of people who actually liked the changes, because I always found it really hard to find the right window in Exposé if I have ~ 15 windows or more.
Doesn't work. The Windows still overlap and I can't see my content. This is not a good substitute for showing all Windows.
And why should it take so many more steps?
10.6 took one mouse move to a corner, followed by selecting the window.
10.7 requires a mouse move/gesture, followed by a selection of an app, followed by another gesture to kind of spread out the windows more, or some Space bar clicks or selecting App Expose and then selecting the window.
This is what makes Spaces especially as it is in SL so great. You can just sort your apps by the task, i.e. email in 1 Space, word processor in a 2nd, etc. Then, you only worry about the number of windows per Space. Also, if you want an App to be always visible like Quicktime, you just set to be in all Spaces.
If Apple just gave us an option between Classic Spaces and Spaces in Mission Control, this would make many, if not all, people happy.
This is what makes Spaces especially as it is in SL so great. You can just sort your apps by the task, i.e. email in 1 Space, word processor in a 2nd, etc. Then, you only worry about the number of windows per Space. Also, if you want an App to be always visible like Quicktime, you just set to be in all Spaces.
If Apple just gave us an option between Classic Spaces and Spaces in Mission Control, this would make many, if not all, people happy.
Frankly, I love Mission Control. I must be computer illiterate or something listening to some folks around here.
The more I read about it, the more I get the distinct impression everyone who is complaining simply doesn't want to think of new, and often better, ways of doing things and just want to stick with the old things. But in that case, I don't see why they want to upgrade to a new OS. Perhaps one day I'll understand though.
What you describe hasn't been removed, it still exists in MC. Just because you can't find it, doesn't mean it ain't there
Wait, what do you mean by that? Is there a way to make Mission Control display all windows, the old way?
Don't be silly. You're not illiterate, you're just not a "power" user .
That's not what his example described. So far as I know, no that feature doesn't exist. But there are comparable alternatives, see KnightWRX's example as a case in point.
Rofl. Are you seriously playing the fanboy card? Well I do use natural scrolling (though you didn't ask me). I guess I must really be in love with Apple. If they advertised jumping off cliffs, I would totally do it.
Apple does screw up often, but I don't consider Mission Control one of their screwups - at least not completely, just in part. That's just my opinion though, just like your opinion is that the old Exposé is superior.
I have mouse button 4 and button 5 set to respectively : "Mission Control" and "App Expose". So it's button 4, choose app, button 5.
And guess what, if I have 3 or more apps with 3 or more Windows each, pressing 3 clicks to achieve what 1 click did before is still a time saver, since I save in overall visual scanning.
Before, All Windows expose would be just a big mess. App expose and your favorite app switching method is cleaner and faster for me, as I don't like visual scanning.
----------
See that is the difference between those that Like Mission Control and those that don't.
If you organize content by association i.e. by App. Then MC is wonderful. However, if content is just content, independent of its associated Application, then MC is a pain.
Everybody's mind works differently. Personally, I am incredibly visual, I can scan through 40-60 windows in OSX 10.5 Expose/Spaces (10.6 ruined it because it messes up the proportional sizing) spread across 4 different Spaces much faster than I can remember which application had the content I am looking for, switch to that application, then invoke App Expose, and then try to find the non-proportionally scaled window.
For me content is simply a visual image and finding a matching image is incredibly simple when that content is not covered up by five other windows.
MC requires much more active thinking for me than 10.5 Expose/Space and I find that MC breaks my concentration and flow of thought.
I think the MC versus 10.5 Expose/Spaces argument/discussion comes down to the fact that peoples minds work differently and MC reverses which type of mind benefits. i.e. people who found 10.5 messy and too much work seem to enjoy MC. People that liked the visual nature of 10.5 find MC too much work and annoying.
Can I work with MC. Sure, but it is annoying every time I use it. Hopefully a developer will be able to work out a powerful alternative. I pretty sure someone will because things like TotalFinder exist and that brought a good tabbed Finder experience.
try this.. 4 finger slide up to mission control, hover mouse over application you want to open, then two finger slide up to separate the open windows, then select the window you want.. Is this the type of control you want?
Well the 2 circle jerkers in this thread can agree all they want that Mission Control is better then Expose, but it's just not the reality.
Let me guess, knightWRX, you use "natural" scrolling?
Excellent description of the difference, so far as I can tell. You helped me sympathize with the complaints, finally. I guess my brain just remembers what apps I have open, even when there are many, so I only need to find the windows within them. And since I pretty much always work with the same groups of apps, force of habits makes me remember my hotkeys/configurations. But, if remembering all that requires effort, that would probably slow down my work and constantly irritate me to no end.
Thanks for making things clear.