Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

akidokraja

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 19, 2013
415
478
Thank you Apple. Finally we have a normal-no-kid-sized-toy Apple Watch. It is stunningly beautiful. Pictures don’t do it justice. It is screaming premium product. Just a first amazing and fresh product after so many years from Apple.
 

Attachments

  • C52FB974-5C58-4D49-83CA-1A22B72CD226.jpeg
    C52FB974-5C58-4D49-83CA-1A22B72CD226.jpeg
    406.3 KB · Views: 288
  • 8AEFB3D9-9574-4963-8231-1E7C3D1FF2C5.jpeg
    8AEFB3D9-9574-4963-8231-1E7C3D1FF2C5.jpeg
    488.9 KB · Views: 242
  • E258EA58-807F-45BC-B684-4053DE5944BB.jpeg
    E258EA58-807F-45BC-B684-4053DE5944BB.jpeg
    454.7 KB · Views: 241
  • 667F2846-7421-4D5B-9B07-5236987B6788.jpeg
    667F2846-7421-4D5B-9B07-5236987B6788.jpeg
    375.8 KB · Views: 232

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
17,169
25,241
Wales, United Kingdom
Thank you Apple. Finally we have a normal-no-kid-sized-toy Apple Watch. It is stunningly beautiful. Pictures don’t do it justice. It is screaming premium product. Just a first amazing and fresh product after so many years from Apple.

A ‘normal-no-kid-sized-toy Apple Watch’? Does that rather ridiculous description make you feel better about your purchase or something?
 

akidokraja

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 19, 2013
415
478
A ‘normal-no-kid-sized-toy Apple Watch’? Does that rather ridiculous description make you feel better about your purchase or something?
It does when you have large wrists like me. Regular AW looked really small, like really small. Not insulting anyone just can't look at my 45mm anymore. If you do not have large wrists like me then regular 45mm looks great.
 

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
17,169
25,241
Wales, United Kingdom
It does when you have large wrists like me. Regular AW looked really small, like really small. Not insulting anyone just can't look at my 45mm anymore. If you do not have large wrists like my regular 45mm looks great.

Thanks for clarifying, it came across as condescending at first. My wrists are small so anything bigger than the 41mm looks absolutely hideous on me which is a bit of a bonus in terms of spending.
 

akidokraja

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 19, 2013
415
478
Thanks for clarifying, it came across as condescending at first. My wrists are small so anything bigger than the 41mm looks absolutely hideous on me which is a bit of a bonus in terms of spending.
No problem. Sorry if I offended you. I am just so genuinely excited. First time after many years that Apple product brings some excitment. And that orange Alpine band is beautiful. The only bad thing is that display is very slightly enlarged compared to 45mm.
 

EastHillWill

macrumors 6502
Dec 2, 2020
472
550
Boise, ID
It’s noticeable side by side
7 on the left screen is smaller
Wow, that’s a big difference. I just upgraded from the 6 to a 7, and I think this is close to the limit for me. However, t’s great that folks with bigger wrists—or just like a large watch—have another option. Will be very interesting to see if we get different sizes. If it’s popular it wouldn’t be surprising to see Apple make a smaller one, although they may not be willing to accept the according battery life hit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xDKP

mjpearce023

macrumors 6502a
Jul 10, 2012
784
565
Just got back from the apple store and the watch does look alot better in person than it does in pictures. I ended up canceling my instore pickup just because I prefer the thickness and weight of the series 7/8 SS. Now when the ultra 2 comes out and they stretch the screens to the edge of the titanium then this will start to get tempting but the screen was no bigger than my series 7 that I could tell. It might be nice to have as something to wear out and for exercising but I cant see wearing it around the house all day.
 

Apples Apples Everywhere

macrumors 6502
Jan 4, 2017
302
692
Thanks for the side by side! If I copy the 45 mm and lay it over the 49 mm, barely bigger is still my take. The 45 mm is pretty great in the first place with that edge to edge screen.

20F3DA97-5A77-4BF9-8FCE-D6D4F1D5FB34 copy.jpeg
 

CharlesShaw

macrumors 68000
May 8, 2015
1,657
2,751
Yes, screen itself is only 2% larger but that case screams PREMIUM. Pictures do not show it well, it really looks nice.
I agree that photos don’t show it well. Having never seen the previous titanium watches in person, and coming from stainless steel versions, I was expecting to think it was going to be utilitarian and just deal with it, but I was instead delighted by the weight, size, sheen, and feel of the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: akidokraja

akidokraja

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 19, 2013
415
478
I agree that photos don’t show it well. Having never seen the previous titanium watches in person, and coming from stainless steel versions, I was expecting to think it was going to be utilitarian and just deal with it, but I was instead delighted by the weight, size, sheen, and feel of the case.
Yes, I did have titanium watches before but this Ultra looks really pretty. Probably best industrial design I have ever seen. And the bands are also stunning, both Orange Alpine and Yellow Snorkel edition.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.