LOVE Win11Debloat! First thing I run.This is awesome. Thanks.
LOVE Win11Debloat! First thing I run.This is awesome. Thanks.
Chris Titus has a debloater that ironically has become bloated and I now avoid that. I'll have to check out this debloater.LOVE Win11Debloat! First thing I run.
That is a great (and hilarious) way to put it. It was better before.Chris Titus has a debloater that ironically has become bloated and I now avoid that. I'll have to check out this debloater.
I use OpenShell, it is the successor of ClassicShell. I use it on Windows 10 and on Windows 11 with the old (Windows NT 4.0) style start menu!@LeeW
Do you know of a good tool or piece of software if one wants to go back to an older look/feel the Start button and Menu?
the old (Windows NT 4.0) style start menu!
Still very content in the walled garden. Added another Mac to the lineup - a base M1 iMac for the business to be used on the reception desk.
With my camera I made the decision at some point there is not going back to the time before I had a camera. I love the results too much. I have switched from the X100V as I wanted something more flexible. Got an X-T5 with the new 23mm 1.4 LM WR.
Personal device sorted. Bagged a 2020 M1 13 MBA in the sales. Bought through the business so can claim the VAT back so net cost £600.
Yeah,I guess a TB switch could make things a little less manual.
???Windows Cons: I dislike the lack of retina
I wish it were...Buy a Mac and install windows via boot camp. Life’s good.
Blame Apple. When someone tell me that he "needs" iMessage, I answer: get an open compatible Messager.iMessage...which leads to one of the biggest drawbacks to using windows as my main OS.
???
What prevents you to use Windows on a "retina" screen?
By the way "retina" is an Apple buzz for high DPI screens that are now provided elsewhere too.
Yeah,
I would recommend something like Thunderbolt 4 KVM Switch
I have a no-name (non-TB) KVM switch that I got off Amazon and it better then switching cables
With Windows, you don't need an exact 1 pixel to 4 mapping to get a crisp picture. I use 150% and get a gorgeous crisp screen real estate.you need a 5K resolution to have a perfect 1 pixel to 4 mapping 1440p equivalent.
With Windows, you don't need an exact 1 pixel to 4 mapping to get a crisp picture. I use 150% and get a gorgeous crisp screen real estate.
Nothing. I use a 27" 4k screen with both windows and Mac with a KVM switch. I use it at 150% in windows and 1440p in Mac. Looks great!???
What prevents you to use Windows on a "retina" screen?
By the way "retina" is an Apple buzz for high DPI screens that are now provided elsewhere too.
Blame Apple. When someone tell me that he "needs" iMessage, I answer: get an open compatible Messager.
iMessage is a no-go. Period.
If you're aware that "retina" is just an Apple marketing term then you should also be aware that having a 1-to-1 ratio is only a requirement when working in macOS. Everyone outside of Apple has learned how to deal with fractional scaling. Your "need" for a 5k monitor is simply because of Apple's usual mediocre software engineering, not because of anything inherent to the PC world.I'm aware that retina is just Apples marketing term. For years I ran a Windows desktop on a 4K 27" which although it's HiDPI it isn't what Apple would class a retina. At 27" you need a 5K resolution to have a perfect 1 pixel to 4 mapping 1440p equivalent.
If you're aware that "retina" is just an Apple marketing term then you should also be aware that having a 1-to-1 ratio is only a requirement when working in macOS. Everyone outside of Apple has learned how to deal with fractional scaling. Your "need" for a 5k monitor is simply because of Apple's usual mediocre software engineering, not because of anything inherent to the PC world.
It's kind of similar to why Apple used Xeon processors in the Mac Pro. It doesn't matter that the only people who would benefit from a workstation-class machine with ECC memory are CAD technicians and other engineers who need dead-on precision (generally, people who rarely buy Macs), Apple insisted on gimping the performance of their workstations because they knew they could demand a larger mark-up than they would have because of some so-called "pro" feature that didn't actually do anything for the vast majority of their users.It's maddening that Apple won't work on this, as the "retina" blessed options are so limited and even then, the Point sizes they've chosen as "correct" often make things on screen too small for many of us -- especially as we age
If you're aware that "retina" is just an Apple marketing term then you should also be aware that having a 1-to-1 ratio is only a requirement when working in macOS. Everyone outside of Apple has learned how to deal with fractional scaling. Your "need" for a 5k monitor is simply because of Apple's usual mediocre software engineering, not because of anything inherent to the PC world.
I'm not sure what point you're making?
I simply said you need 5K 27" to have a perfect 1-to-1 1440p, which is true. That doesn't mean 4K 27" 1440p doesn't look good, that's what I used prior and it was nice a clear too.