Not sure if you mean figuratively or literally, but the answer in either case would be 'no.' So do tell: where are you going?
Done in camera, not PS.
Hand held. 1 second exposure.
Camera: Canon PowerShot G10
Exposure: 0.033 sec (1/30)
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 6.8 mm
ISO Speed: 200
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Flash: Off, Did not fire
I can't resist commenting on the "that's what it looks like" school of photography. I don't believe there is such a thing as capturing what something "looks like." Cameras can't even capture what the eye and brain might register for a particular person, let alone some 'reality' that would be true for any viewer. In my view, all photos are interpretations. So the goal of the photographer should be to produce a compelling image by whatever means necessary. I think it does photographers a disservice to suggest that all we do is merely 'record' or 'duplicate' that which already exists.
I understand what you meant is that you prefer an appearance of naturalism, but I would like to stress that such an appearance is also a contrivance. You have a lot of decisions to make at the moment of capture, any one of which might substantially alter the resulting photograph and yet still make it look 'natural.' Some images that appear very 'natural' are nonetheless the products of substantial manipulation, and conversely, some images that are "straight out of the camera" look utterly surreal.
Yes, I'm on a soapbox right now, but this is an issue that I really take to heart. The more that people think of photographers as button-pushers, the less credit we get for being creators.
Camera: Canon PowerShot G10
Exposure: 0.033 sec (1/30)
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 6.8 mm
ISO Speed: 200
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Flash: Off, Did not fire
It's in Valencia Spain. It's a road overpass (Puente Monteolivete) that bisects the City of Arts and Sciences. That complex is probably the most photogenic post-war site I've come across. As you can see from the pic below, you can imagine the many ways you can take pics that play with perspective. Y'all far better at this picture-taking than I am, so come down to this place some day and see what you can do with it.
There's more of it in this set: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dailymatador/sets/72157620084177191/
The second one is my favorite pic of the whole trip. Just for the memories for me and the way it makes my wife's stomach turn since she is afraid of heights.
^^ Really conveys height and angle. The clouds show that the camera wasn't tilted to exaggerate anything. The stress on the rope in the lower portion of the frame really lets us know that this was a perilous image. Nice.<<||>>
The second one is my favorite pic of the whole trip. Just for the memories for me and the way it makes my wife's stomach turn since she is afraid of heights.
So, I think I figured out the attachment button problem. My problem started after I told Safari to keep me signed on. <<||>> Weird, but fixed.
I'm not clear on this. Did you tell Safari to remember you or MR to do so? I can't find anything in Safari for sign-in, but I know that when I sign into MR, there is a check box for that. If I reset Safari, it clears this info and I have to sign in again for the forums. That would put the problem on the MR side of things.
I have have odd things happen with the buttons sometimes renaming themselves. The Save button in editing a post will be named Submit Reply or something like that.
Dale