That assumes that GN see LTT as competition. I for one don't, and I doubt Steve does at this point either. They've been pure entertainment for several years now, whereas GN has been heavily focused on things they can prove; and are up-front about their methods and any discrepancies they may find.
It's like saying that Netflix and eBay are competitors. They're both web sites that want a cut of your money, but....
You've misread my post. It was the LTT employee that started this by criticising Gamers Nexus and Hardware Unboxed's testing procedures. Gamers Nexus was just reacting to that.
The fact that the employee chose to do that would suggest that they regard them as competition.
There’s an unwritten rule in some industries that you don’t criticise the competition in public.
When the LTT employee criticised Gamers Nexus, they crossed that line and left themselves open to scrutiny. I don’t believe that Gamers Nexus would have aired their concerns had that comment not been made.
Part of the reason that you don’t criticise the competition is that it can have unintended consequences, and we’ve seen that in this case. By all means, say that you want to have the best testing procedures, but don’t reference and criticise the competition.
I see this as entirely self-inflicted.