Garmin 965 and Ultra 2 Trail Runner update

[PatrickNSF]

I ran Copenhagen Marathon today, and my AWU 2 and Garmin both get the same time (me trying to push all buttons and the end 😉), although Apple congratulates me for doing it in 3.07.18, but the time (as recorded) is 3.12.21.

Nice job!

 

[Psdn]

Congratulations! Excellent result, very strong.

Any idea where this 3.07 could be from? Eg when exporting to Strava or runalyze?

Also please submit a bug report to Apple, thanks.

I looked at runalyze, but the time doesn’t fit in at all. I export all my Garmin data to runalyze, not Apple. But I would have been at same spot on Garmin/apple.

 

[NME42]

I looked at runalyze, but the time doesn’t fit in at all. I export all my Garmin data to runalyze, not Apple. But I would have been at same spot on Garmin/apple.

Weird. Please submit a bug report.

Feedback - Watch

Apple wants to hear from you. Send us your comments and feedback about Apple Watch.

www.apple.com

Bug Reporting - Apple Developer

Now with Feedback Assistant available on iPhone, iPad, Mac, and the web, it’s easier to submit effective bug reports and request enhancements to APIs and tools.

developer.apple.com

 

[TriApple]

I ran Copenhagen Marathon today, and my AWU 2 and Garmin both get the same time (me trying to push all buttons and the end 😉), although Apple congratulates me for doing it in 3.07.18, but the time (as recorded) is 3.12.21.

Congrats on the 26.2. I love every time I find out I’m not the only nerd wearing 2 watches for races or training just to compare data afterwards.

 

[xDKP]

I think you should optionally be able to change the action button from lap marking to pause and start. It’s not a huge deal, but many people don’t need laps/segments.

Agree - more options for customizing is always a great thing.

Just used the Pacer mode on the Apple Watch in yesterdays Copenhagen Marathon and it's always a great mode to keep track of your pace and overall timing compared to your goal. Also pressed the lap/segment button at the half sign, to keep track of the two splits.

 

[quarq]

Agree - more options for customizing is always a great thing.

Just used the Pacer mode on the Apple Watch in yesterdays Copenhagen Marathon and it's always a great mode to keep track of your pace and overall timing compared to your goal. Also pressed the lap/segment button at the half sign, to keep track of the two splits.

Does it allow you to recalibrate with actual race time / actual distance in case of GPS drift ?

 

[quarq]

Went on vacation for a week. Did one, 1hr run and ended with 80% battery and realized I forgot my charger. It would be so cool if you could charge off the back of your phone.

Anyhow, realized I wasn't going to make it through the week with 80% charge. I ended up only using it for runs and on low power mode (in Workout setting) and was able to do about 8hrs of running and came home with 4% battery. ;-) I was wishing I had a Garmin or Suunto at that point.. But, managed to pull it off.

 

[xDKP]

Does it allow you to recalibrate with actual race time / actual distance in case of GPS drift ?

I unfortunately not - seems to be pretty spot on though. Started to be a bit behind the distance markers but it eventually evened out and was almost spot on

 

[TriApple]

Chiming in here as something that has both an Epix Pro and an AWU2 and hopes to rationalize to just 1 device. Also training for my 7th Ironman triathlon.

I also like some of the Garmin stats and reporting (training load & effect are 2 I like), but I actually have found compelling alternatives such as Superset Health. I've been training for my IM while wearing both for all activities & the trends on both the iOS apps such as SuperSet and Connect are extremely close. I've also found Superset gives me a good HRV trend value as well.

Honestly, I'm still not sure which I will end up keeping and which I will sell, but I'm ever so slightly leaning to the AWU2.

The primary downside, battery life, really doesn't hit me that hard as I work and train from home 95% of the time so keeping my battery charged while at my desk for 45-60 minutes a day is not a bother at all.

I absolutely love that the AWU2 heart rate data is as-good as my chest-strap (HRM Pro Plus) that I am forced to use with the Epic Pro as the OHR for the wrist does not do nearly a good enough job.

Swim HR on the AWU2 is good enough, the HRM-swim paired to the Epix Pro is definitely better, but also significantly more of a PITA to wear for swimming.

Strength training is the other place I am shocked at the AWU2 HR accuracy as so much more reliable than the OHR on the Epix Pro.

One thing I strongly prefer on the Epix Pro is the screen customization options for structured run workouts based on HR or Power Zones. On the Garmin you get a gauge visual showing you the intended range and your current as a tick mark. It's fantastic. The AWU gives you notifications & haptics, but I miss the gas gauge style indicator for target zone.

A couple weeks later and I eventually made a decision on this & kept only the AWU. Just shipped the Epix Pro off today via online sale.

Ultimately I think both are fantastic watches and would be an excellent choice for an endurance athlete / triathlete. I do disagree with the whole "Garmin is purpose built for this therefore it is a better choice" concept. It used to land, but the 3rd party App Store for watches, for fitness/health specifically, is so robust now that you can find a "purpose built" app to suit many of the needs you'd get "out of the box" from your Garmin.

If you can feel comfortable using the AWU to its full potential to meet your use case needs - which means you need to accept 3rd party apps as OK to use for your primary training/health - then the AWU can do what the Garmin can (other than battery life in between workouts - but for DURING workouts, all the way up to an Ironman, you can make do with the AWU.

it's certainly not the right choice for everyone - if you want to fiddle absolutely zero with your watch and want it to be your training tool; get a Garmin. If you want a watch that can do everything you need and don't mind treating your watch like you likely treat your phone (browse the App Store, download compelling apps) and you want the aWU benefits (cellular, no phone on run, etc); the AWU will be a great choice.

 

[BSG75]

A couple weeks later and I eventually made a decision on this & kept only the AWU. Just shipped the Epix Pro off today via online sale.

Ultimately I think both are fantastic watches and would be an excellent choice for an endurance athlete / triathlete. I do disagree with the whole "Garmin is purpose built for this therefore it is a better choice" concept. It used to land, but the 3rd party App Store for watches, for fitness/health specifically, is so robust now that you can find a "purpose built" app to suit many of the needs you'd get "out of the box" from your Garmin.

If you can feel comfortable using the AWU to its full potential to meet your use case needs - which means you need to accept 3rd party apps as OK to use for your primary training/health - then the AWU can do what the Garmin can (other than battery life in between workouts - but for DURING workouts, all the way up to an Ironman, you can make do with the AWU.

it's certainly not the right choice for everyone - if you want to fiddle absolutely zero with your watch and want it to be your training tool; get a Garmin. If you want a watch that can do everything you need and don't mind treating your watch like you likely treat your phone (browse the App Store, download compelling apps) and you want the aWU benefits (cellular, no phone on run, etc); the AWU will be a great choice.

Very well said. IMO, they're both excellent devices. It all comes down to what works best for the individual user.

 

[Dopestar]

Just speaking for my use case, I don't really want an extension of the phone on my wrist anymore, so I like having a watch that runs as independently from the phone as possible. IMO, I think Garmin should market the Epix, Fenix, Marq, etc., as connected watches, rather than smartwatches. As smartwatches they leave much to be desired.

Can relate with your post. I have both the Ultra 1 and Epix Pro 2. I have smart notifications turned off on my Epix as I want to be ”disconnected” from social media apps and text messages. I really love the Epix for fitness. Now for my use case I do use both watches. On weekdays - i wear both because my ultra is notifies me on emails, text messages associated to work. So my primary use case for the Ultra is to be connected to work and social but when i want to disconnect from all that and focus on fitness I only wear my Epix. Whenever I do run outside I wear both and leave my phone at home. I consider the Ultra as my iPhone mini - very compact and portable that will keep me connected for a limited time.

 

[Zelegorm]

There are so many Features missing on the garmin. That’s the big issue. The other way around there is nothing missing. You need an app for several things. That’s all. But it’s there. That’s the problem with the garmin. You cannot pimp the garmin. The App Store there is literally useless.

 

[cubodado]

Interesting… I have no running friend right now that uses AW but I think the potential is excellent. Some issue since I don’t have Ultra on battery life, I’m planning a marathon in December's and since I’m a slow I runner don’t know if my battery will last enough or if I need to change/upgrade.

 

[rbart]

Interesting… I have no running friend right now that uses AW but I think the potential is excellent. Some issue since I don’t have Ultra on battery life, I’m planning a marathon in December's and since I’m a slow I runner don’t know if my battery will last enough or if I need to change/upgrade.

Of course an Ultra is more than enough for a marathon...
You can run more than 10h with an Ultra.
I have ran a marathon with an old S5, and I am not Kipchoge
Most people exaggerate battery issues on AW, AW battery lasts more than most runners.
Except if you run Ultra trails for more than 15h (and you can do it in low power mode), an Ultra is OK.

 

[cubodado]

For sure an Ultra is enough to last for a marathon, I was wondering if I had to make myself a special gift for my 50th birthday other than marathon inscription & trip and buy myself a new Ultra (or Garmin? But I like too much the smart functions and ecosystem of AW) or try to run it with my AW6… right now battery is 91% and was 100% in September 2023. A linear projection should be around 84% in December. Don’t know if it’s enough. Maybe with power saving mode. But I like to have a fast glance with AOD.

 

[rbart]

For sure an Ultra is enough to last for a marathon, I was wondering if I had to make myself a special gift for my 50th birthday other than marathon inscription & trip and buy myself a new Ultra (or Garmin? But I like too much the smart functions and ecosystem of AW) or try to run it with my AW6… right now battery is 91% and was 100% in September 2023. A linear projection should be around 84% in December. Don’t know if it’s enough. Maybe with power saving mode. But I like to have a fast glance with AOD.

It depends how long you need to run a marathon

 

[rbart]

Another important optimization for a race is to disable LTE which is not very useful in such situation

 

[cubodado]

Let’s say I need 4h45’ of active app time, even if I plan on doing something better. LTE is useless abroad, so this is out of question. A doubt is if it’s better to use a cardio chest strap or watch for HR (I have it), I find the watch information quite reliable and more comfortable, comfort is important in such race.

 

[rbart]

4h45 is probably feasible with your current watch if you don't enable LTE while running and start at 100%
Tou can also have a big win if you disable AOD.
Cardio is not eating a lot, I am not sure a BT connection to external cardio is better.