Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

epicrayban

macrumors 604
Nov 7, 2014
6,517
5,353
The gear s3 legit looks interesting. And beautiful, especially the frontier one.

Is the interface as intuitive as it looks in videos I've seen? Early video impressions of the gear s3 makes the interface look really slick and even fun to use.

Is it?
 

Fernandez21

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2010
4,840
3,183
The gear s3 legit looks interesting. And beautiful, especially the frontier one.

Is the interface as intuitive as it looks in videos I've seen? Early video impressions of the gear s3 makes the interface look really slick and even fun to use.

Is it?
The ui is actually really nice and runs very smooth and faster than my Apple watch. The downfall is the lack of apps, the appstore is mostly watchfaces. Some of the apps that are available arent optimized so the expierence is lackluster, but the ones that are look and run beautifully.

Hopefully Samsung keeps the S2 software on par with the S3 to encourage app developers, basically anyone that made apps for the old square gear s had to start over again.

Love the look of the new S3, especially the frontier. But im disappointed they went larger, I was hoping to would keep the same size and go thinner.
 

epicrayban

macrumors 604
Nov 7, 2014
6,517
5,353
The ui is actually really nice and runs very smooth and faster than my Apple watch. The downfall is the lack of apps, the appstore is mostly watchfaces. Some of the apps that are available arent optimized so the expierence is lackluster, but the ones that are look and run beautifully.

Hopefully Samsung keeps the S2 software on par with the S3 to encourage app developers, basically anyone that made apps for the old square gear s had to start over again.

Love the look of the new S3, especially the frontier. But im disappointed they went larger, I was hoping to would keep the same size and go thinner.

Besides lack of apps, how is the interface for day to day use as a watch and as a link to your phone?


I'm imagining this but maybe in that orange rubber strap.

nexus2cee_Gear-S3_frontier_Spec_main_1-668x714.jpg


Looks sporty, rugged, and stunning. Features look and sound great too.

I kind of like that they went with a bigger screen. The LTE will need the bigger battery, I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: co.ag.2005

Fernandez21

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2010
4,840
3,183
Besides lack of apps, how is the interface for day to day use as a watch and as a link to your phone?


I'm imagining this but maybe in that orange rubber strap.

nexus2cee_Gear-S3_frontier_Spec_main_1-668x714.jpg


Looks sporty, rugged, and stunning. Features look and sound great too.

I kind of like that they went with a bigger screen. The LTE will need the bigger battery, I think.
You mean like this one? It does look really nice, though personally i like metal bands. The classic looks really cool too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: epicrayban

epicrayban

macrumors 604
Nov 7, 2014
6,517
5,353
You mean like this one? It does look really nice, though personally i like metal bands. The classic looks really cool too.


Yeah, but the LTE is awesome. It only activates when you're out of reach of your phone.

Are you guys finding LTE worth it?
 

Fernandez21

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2010
4,840
3,183
Yeah, but the LTE is awesome. It only activates when you're out of reach of your phone.

Are you guys finding LTE worth it?
I like it because it allows me to get phones calls from both my personal line and work line. My work phone is the Note 7 which is synced to the watch, but my iPhone number is synced through at&t sync. It also allows me to just leave my phones in the car and head out without them, I find this much more useful then always having to keep it connected to a phone.

Downside is battery life is much shorter whenever you use the cellular network, there really arent many apps to take advantage of it, and of course you end up paying more on your phone bill. If not for the fact i got it for $50, I wouldnt have done it. The watch new is $350, but i got it for $50 plus $10 a month for service for 2 years, which comes out to $290, so it came out cheaper than buying the WiFi model plus I get wireless service. But if I had to pay full price plus service, not sure if i would've done it, especially with the lack of apps to make cellular useful.

As for the interface, it works very well and is easy to understand. Really like the back button and the circular rim to navigate. Samsung did a good job in designing the interface for a round screen and it runs very smooth. Notifications for built in apps works well, but for third party apps they can be limiting and just give you what you would get in the pull down on your phone. It can also sometimes be difficult to act on them, some give you the options in the notification, but others you have to "open" the notification first to act.

Example is I use a third party email app "boxer", so when i get a new email, the notification on my watch gives me the first few lines, but to do any action I have to "open" the notification which gives me the whole email before I can delete or do something, rather then giving the option from the get go, which i get on my Apple watch.

Another is if I use Google maps on my phone and use turn by Turn, those don't get synced to the watch, unlike android wear or the Apple watch. I had to get a 3rd party standalone app on the watch and do my search there if I want those turn by turn notifications on my watch, but then I don't get them on my phone.

And again the lack of apps is discouraging. There are some really good ones and they work great, but there just arent many.

It kind of reminds me of webos, where it's a great interface but the support isn't there outside of Samsung. Hopefully it gets popular enough and Samsung builds out the platform so it gets the 3rd party support it needs. But at least the basics are covered by Samsung.
 
  • Like
Reactions: epicrayban

epicrayban

macrumors 604
Nov 7, 2014
6,517
5,353
I like it because it allows me to get phones calls from both my personal line and work line. My work phone is the Note 7 which is synced to the watch, but my iPhone number is synced through at&t sync. It also allows me to just leave my phones in the car and head out without them, I find this much more useful then always having to keep it connected to a phone.

Downside is battery life is much shorter whenever you use the cellular network, there really arent many apps to take advantage of it, and of course you end up paying more on your phone bill. If not for the fact i got it for $50, I wouldnt have done it. The watch new is $350, but i got it for $50 plus $10 a month for service for 2 years, which comes out to $290, so it came out cheaper than buying the WiFi model plus I get wireless service. But if I had to pay full price plus service, not sure if i would've done it, especially with the lack of apps to make cellular useful.

As for the interface, it works very well and is easy to understand. Really like the back button and the circular rim to navigate. Samsung did a good job in designing the interface for a round screen and it runs very smooth. Notifications for built in apps works well, but for third party apps they can be limiting and just give you what you would get in the pull down on your phone. It can also sometimes be difficult to act on them, some give you the options in the notification, but others you have to "open" the notification first to act.

Example is I use a third party email app "boxer", so when i get a new email, the notification on my watch gives me the first few lines, but to do any action I have to "open" the notification which gives me the whole email before I can delete or do something, rather then giving the option from the get go, which i get on my Apple watch.

Another is if I use Google maps on my phone and use turn by Turn, those don't get synced to the watch, unlike android wear or the Apple watch. I had to get a 3rd party standalone app on the watch and do my search there if I want those turn by turn notifications on my watch, but then I don't get them on my phone.

And again the lack of apps is discouraging. There are some really good ones and they work great, but there just arent many.

It kind of reminds me of webos, where it's a great interface but the support isn't there outside of Samsung. Hopefully it gets popular enough and Samsung builds out the platform so it gets the 3rd party support it needs. But at least the basics are covered by Samsung.

Thanks for this. Interesting stuff. I'm looking forward to the reviews of the gear s3 and the eventual unveiling of the Google smartwatches too.

Slowly getting interested in smartwatches...
 

Sensamic

macrumors 68040
Mar 26, 2010
3,072
689
I like it because it allows me to get phones calls from both my personal line and work line. My work phone is the Note 7 which is synced to the watch, but my iPhone number is synced through at&t sync. It also allows me to just leave my phones in the car and head out without them, I find this much more useful then always having to keep it connected to a phone.

Downside is battery life is much shorter whenever you use the cellular network, there really arent many apps to take advantage of it, and of course you end up paying more on your phone bill. If not for the fact i got it for $50, I wouldnt have done it. The watch new is $350, but i got it for $50 plus $10 a month for service for 2 years, which comes out to $290, so it came out cheaper than buying the WiFi model plus I get wireless service. But if I had to pay full price plus service, not sure if i would've done it, especially with the lack of apps to make cellular useful.

As for the interface, it works very well and is easy to understand. Really like the back button and the circular rim to navigate. Samsung did a good job in designing the interface for a round screen and it runs very smooth. Notifications for built in apps works well, but for third party apps they can be limiting and just give you what you would get in the pull down on your phone. It can also sometimes be difficult to act on them, some give you the options in the notification, but others you have to "open" the notification first to act.

Example is I use a third party email app "boxer", so when i get a new email, the notification on my watch gives me the first few lines, but to do any action I have to "open" the notification which gives me the whole email before I can delete or do something, rather then giving the option from the get go, which i get on my Apple watch.

Another is if I use Google maps on my phone and use turn by Turn, those don't get synced to the watch, unlike android wear or the Apple watch. I had to get a 3rd party standalone app on the watch and do my search there if I want those turn by turn notifications on my watch, but then I don't get them on my phone.

And again the lack of apps is discouraging. There are some really good ones and they work great, but there just arent many.

It kind of reminds me of webos, where it's a great interface but the support isn't there outside of Samsung. Hopefully it gets popular enough and Samsung builds out the platform so it gets the 3rd party support it needs. But at least the basics are covered by Samsung.
So would you say the Apple watch is better?

I haven't tried either, but the Apple watch seems better than Android wear and with more apps.
 

navaira

macrumors 68040
May 28, 2015
3,934
5,161
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Fit 2 app store has been updated. By which I mean they threw hundreds of watch faces on it and removed the search feature. I still know that Spotify isn't in there, Shamesung.
 

rhinosrcool

macrumors 68000
Sep 5, 2009
1,761
695
MN
The ui is actually really nice and runs very smooth and faster than my Apple watch. The downfall is the lack of apps, the appstore is mostly watchfaces. Some of the apps that are available arent optimized so the expierence is lackluster, but the ones that are look and run beautifully.

Hopefully Samsung keeps the S2 software on par with the S3 to encourage app developers, basically anyone that made apps for the old square gear s had to start over again.

Love the look of the new S3, especially the frontier. But im disappointed they went larger, I was hoping to would keep the same size and go thinner.

Personally, I'm glad they went bigger. Before I switched to t-mobile, I had the gear s and it's big screen was great. Probably, this is going to be my next smart watch. Currently, I have an android wear watch and I am not so impressed with android wear.
 

Fernandez21

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2010
4,840
3,183
Personally, I'm glad they went bigger. Before I switched to t-mobile, I had the gear s and it's big screen was great. Probably, this is going to be my next smart watch. Currently, I have an android wear watch and I am not so impressed with android wear.
Not against them making bigger watches, but I hope they keep making smaller ones too. I dont want a repeat of the phone market where Apple has a monopoly on flagships smaller than 5".
 

tbayrgs

macrumors 604
Jul 5, 2009
7,467
5,097
The Apple watch is more capable (while connected to your phone) and has better apps, while the Gear has a better interface and faster os, imo.

Have you used your S2 paired with anything other than a Samsung phone?
 

autumn

macrumors member
Sep 8, 2006
78
3
Can someone help me to figure out whether you could set language to simplified Chinese on gear fit 2? I haven't been able to find an answer.

I'm thinking about getting this for my parents. Thanks in advance!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.