Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Kung gu

Suspended
Original poster
Oct 20, 2018
1,379
2,434
Here is an other geek-bench score! The Mac is back guys!!!

1634606909668.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy James

UBS28

macrumors 68030
Oct 2, 2012
2,893
2,340
So it performs like a desktop Intel i9 CPU (slightly higher single core but slightly lower multi-core)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy James

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,522
19,679
I am a bit disappointed I have to say. I expected higher single-core performance than M1. The multi-core is as expected. There is little doubt that this will be the fastest laptop for a while. Maybe the upcoming Alder Lake will match the single-core performance, who knows...
 

Kpjoslee

macrumors 6502
Sep 11, 2007
417
269
I am a bit disappointed I have to say. I expected higher single-core performance than M1. The multi-core is as expected. There is little doubt that this will be the fastest laptop for a while. Maybe the upcoming Alder Lake will match the single-core performance, who knows...
Not surprised at all actually. M1 performance cores didn't look like it will go beyond 3.2Ghz. Alder Lake is going to be interesting competition not because of Golden Cove but the little cores being much better than expected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy James

crazy dave

macrumors 65816
Sep 9, 2010
1,453
1,229
Not surprised at all actually. M1 performance cores didn't look like it will go beyond 3.2Ghz. Alder Lake is going to be interesting competition not because of Golden Cove but the little cores being much better than expected.

He was hoping for avalanche cores given the timing of the launch. I have to admit so was I though I was pretty sure they were going to be firestorm.
 

jgbr

macrumors 6502a
Sep 14, 2007
962
1,185
need to see the Ghz! particularly also to see if any differences between Pro and Max on that front.
 

crazy dave

macrumors 65816
Sep 9, 2010
1,453
1,229
need to see the Ghz! particularly also to see if any differences between Pro and Max on that front.

Supposedly all chips support the same single core performance while the Pro and Max have the same multicore performance as each other. The bigger difference will probably be in the thermals for the 16” vs 14” allowing higher sustained performance in the former.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy James

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,522
19,679
Supposedly all chips support the same single core performance while the Pro and Max have the same multicore performance as each other. The bigger difference will probably be in the thermals for the 16” vs 14” allowing higher sustained performance in the former.

Given that both models significantly improved the cooling system from their predecessors (the 14" should have around 50-60W sustained cooling power), I'd expect the CPU to run pretty much unrestricted on both. The GPU is where the thermals are much more important.

But then again, M1 Max is more of a GPU with an integrated CPU than a SoC in traditional term of the world. It's literally a gaming console..
 

quarkysg

macrumors 65816
Oct 12, 2019
1,247
841
But then again, M1 Max is more of a GPU with an integrated CPU than a SoC in traditional term of the world. It's literally a gaming console..
I just realised that the M1 Max Macs have a larger data bus width (512 bits) and bandwidth than the current Intel Mac Pro (384 bits.) And the M1 Max GPUs are no longer bottle-necked by PCIe's measly 32 GB/s bandwidth. I expect real world work load for the M1 Max Macs to fly for large datasets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Veeper

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
I am a bit disappointed I have to say. I expected higher single-core performance than M1. The multi-core is as expected. There is little doubt that this will be the fastest laptop for a while. Maybe the upcoming Alder Lake will match the single-core performance, who knows...
Do you think the single-core score indicates that the core micro-architecture is indeed the same as the M1 / A14, and does not have any of the improvements of the A15?

If so, it would be a bit underwhelming. Maybe there just wasn't time to do it all...

When might be expect an M2 Pro/Max? Next October, or in 2023? I wonder whether Apple will adopt a yearly cycle or every 18-24 months?
 

Serban55

Suspended
Oct 18, 2020
2,153
4,344
Given that both models significantly improved the cooling system from their predecessors (the 14" should have around 50-60W sustained cooling power), I'd expect the CPU to run pretty much unrestricted on both. The GPU is where the thermals are much more important.

But then again, M1 Max is more of a GPU with an integrated CPU than a SoC in traditional term of the world. It's literally a gaming console..
why do you think the maxed out 14" get only 96W USB-C Power Adapter but the 16" with the same SoC you get the 140W ?
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,522
19,679
Do you think the single-core score indicates that the core micro-architecture is indeed the same as the M1 / A14, and does not have any of the improvements of the A15?

If so, it would be a bit underwhelming. Maybe there just wasn't time to do it all...

The cache size and leaked performance suggest 3.2 Firestorm. The little cores are more weird, because they have more cache than Icestorm. So maybe it's Firestorm + Blizzard?

When might be expect an M2 Pro/Max? Next October, or in 2023? I wonder whether Apple will adopt a yearly cycle or every 18-24 months?

I'd say exactly one yer from now :D
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,522
19,679
why do you think the maxed out 14" get only 96W USB-C Power Adapter but the 16" with the same SoC you get the 140W ?

I doubt it to be honest. The USB-C will likely be still limited to 100W PD (less in practice). The new MagSafe is the dedicated fast charging port.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.