This looks really great.
I like HDR for landscapes, because it's like having studio-quality lighting for the whole world.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
HDR (High Dynamic Range) photography - post your HDR
- Thread starter valdore
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
This looks really great.
I like HDR for landscapes, because it's like having studio-quality lighting for the whole world.
I'm just now beginning to "think HDR" when I do photos, but I wanna keep them realistic looking. Not over use the "Harry Potter slider" as Scott Kelby called it. Here's one recently.
Thats really good, I love how it look so artsy like some artist drew and painted it.
Anyway here's mine. I send it for printing already (turn out lovely, now I need to look for an old theme photo frame) and I think I posted it in photo of the day somewhere (can't remember), but I'm certain I didn't post it here
This is my first HDR, not really sure if I'm on the right track.
It's nice, but HDR doesn't really do much for it, since there aren't really many shadows on a flat surface.
Just Google 'HDR Techniques' or something along that line. There are plenty of ways. Most people use Photomatix software and there's some stuff on their site as well.
Hi Guys,
This is my first attempt at an HDR image, be gentle???
We need to be gentle cause it looks fantastic? I'm quite confused...
Great job man!
Inukshuk at the cross country track for the 2010 Olympics. Over cast day so I tried an HDR. I don't think the result is too bad.
IMHO it's way too dark.
I sort of agree, but on the other hand have you tried it in B&W? I think with the softness and darkness it might not look bad in B&W...give it a try
Well, I think that if it's overtly bright it becomes.... distracting. It kinda screams attention. But I'm actually working on alternative versions of that picture, so I'll give it a shot
EDIT: here's a "lighter" version of the image. I'll try B&W next.
EDIT2: and here's the same image in B&W. I dunno about it....
Attachments
Well, I think that if it's overtly bright it becomes.... distracting. It kinda screams attention. But I'm actually working on alternative versions of that picture, so I'll give it a shot
EDIT: here's a "lighter" version of the image. I'll try B&W next.
EDIT2: and here's the same image in B&W. I dunno about it....
Much better
. Both pictures looks really nice compared to the first version you made, but they look really soft when viewed larger which IMHO doesn't do any good for the picture.Much better
The softness is there because I tried applying the Orton-technique to the picture, giving it somewhat "dreamy" appearance. The originals are not soft at all.
i very rarely post my photos on here as i feel i still have much to learn
but would like some feedback on this image
i tried to go for quite an unreal look as i very much loved how the clouds were looking that day, and how the shadows came out
but someone said to me that it looks horrible as theres too much colour saturation and contrast
so i'd like some other peoples' thoughts on it
thanks
but would like some feedback on this image
i tried to go for quite an unreal look as i very much loved how the clouds were looking that day, and how the shadows came out
but someone said to me that it looks horrible as theres too much colour saturation and contrast
so i'd like some other peoples' thoughts on it
thanks
test from today:
observations:
should've corrected CA before merging.
the red channel is clipped (right part of clouds). the blue one is too, but only on some dark tones.
dull, flat things stay that way (building right).
pushed the blues too much in the upper left corner.
wind causes blurry grass
exposures used are these:
they are -4 / -2 / 0 / +2
observations:
should've corrected CA before merging.
the red channel is clipped (right part of clouds). the blue one is too, but only on some dark tones.
dull, flat things stay that way (building right).
pushed the blues too much in the upper left corner.
wind causes blurry grass
exposures used are these:
they are -4 / -2 / 0 / +2