Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

leighonigar

macrumors 6502a
May 5, 2007
908
1
He was certainly concerned with getting the full tonal range out of every exposure. His prints had a depth that digital fails to match: rich, deep blacks, detailed mid-tones, subtle highlights. To see an exhibition of prints by Adams (or many other photographers, going back pre-1900) is to realise the lustrous quality that was available from large-format cameras and lenses.

Yes, if he were alive today, he'd no doubt investigate the potential of HDR. But I feel sure he would tackle it in a careful, methodical way. The results would be amazing, I'm equally sure... but he wouldn't go in for eye-popping effects. He was too good a photographer for that...

I was lucky enough to see an exhibition of prints by the man himself quite recently. What struck me was just how much darkroom manipulation he must have been up to. I'm not therefore sure how much of what you see is the result of the format, and how much arises as the result of his obvious dodge/burn/develop skills.
 

stagi

macrumors 65816
Feb 18, 2006
1,125
0
coastguardle9.jpg



Nice image!
 

termina3

macrumors 65816
Jul 16, 2007
1,078
1
TX
I was lucky enough to see an exhibition of prints by the man himself quite recently. What struck me was just how much darkroom manipulation he must have been up to. I'm not therefore sure how much of what you see is the result of the format, and how much arises as the result of his obvious dodge/burn/develop skills.

Ansel Adams had small teams working on each negative. He oversaw the teams and sent them off to make changes he wanted. Ultimately, he decided which prints were ready for mass production and show.

Actually, if you view his work chronologically, you'll see an interesting trend of more contrast as time goes on. Rumor has it that his eyesight was starting to go at this point, so that he'd want/need more "pop" and dynamic range to get the same effect for him.
 

leighonigar

macrumors 6502a
May 5, 2007
908
1
Ansel Adams had small teams working on each negative. He oversaw the teams and sent them off to make changes he wanted. Ultimately, he decided which prints were ready for mass production and show.

Actually, if you view his work chronologically, you'll see an interesting trend of more contrast as time goes on. Rumor has it that his eyesight was starting to go at this point, so that he'd want/need more "pop" and dynamic range to get the same effect for him.

Well there we go. I have yet to read much about the man, all I know is that they were 'mental' in a good way, mostly.
 

PCMacUser

macrumors 68000
Jan 13, 2005
1,706
25
And now for something completely different...

This is an experimental 'HDR'. Shot on Fuji Velvia film, and scanned in three times on my Nikon Coolscan at different exposures. Combined in Photomatix in the usual way, with EV's of -3, 0, 2.

BTW, the bird is called a 'Kea'. It's the world's only alpine parrot and can be found in the South Island of New Zealand.
 

Attachments

  • kea1c_b_a.jpg
    kea1c_b_a.jpg
    253 KB · Views: 122

powaking

macrumors 6502
Jul 3, 2008
477
190


I have one, too. That is my third HDR shot.

This shot looks great but its a little unbalanced for me (sky vs landscape). I think if you cropped the top a little bit to get rid of that dark cloud (its pulling my eye) then I think it would be even better. Great colors!
 

scottydawg

macrumors 6502
Jan 22, 2008
316
10
Sacramento, CA
This is an experimental 'HDR'. Shot on Fuji Velvia film, and scanned in three times on my Nikon Coolscan at different exposures. Combined in Photomatix in the usual way, with EV's of -3, 0, 2.

BTW, the bird is called a 'Kea'. It's the world's only alpine parrot and can be found in the South Island of New Zealand.

Nice photo and great result. This is the first I have heard of this technique and your thinking "out of the box" certainly can make you a better artist.
 
I was lucky enough to see an exhibition of prints by the man himself quite recently. What struck me was just how much darkroom manipulation he must have been up to. I'm not therefore sure how much of what you see is the result of the format, and how much arises as the result of his obvious dodge/burn/develop skills.

Its both. He was a master of exposure, using the zone system, and a master at printing. You cant make a print like Adams unless you have a rich negative and the skills with which to print it. I was fortunate to do a workshop with his assistant, John Sexton, and its unbelievable all of the tricks that these guys have in the darkroom. John Sexton is imo the single best printer alive today and if your interested in darkroom work then you should sign up for one of his workshops. Its worth 10 times the price you pay.
 
Yesterdays:



and Todays:



Comments and criticisms welcome.

If you lighten the horse up, that would be a really nice picture. As is he is just too dark and your eye simply goes to the bright spots in the sky. Thats the problem I see with most of the HDR shots I see today. The picture becomes more a statement about the technique itself than it does about the subject matter in the picture. The images should still be about the subject matter first and technique second. Most of the HDR work I have seen, the technique actually distracts you from the subject and this is a perfect example of that.
 

Chris14

macrumors regular
Aug 13, 2006
128
0
Hamilton, NZ
If you lighten the horse up, that would be a really nice picture. As is he is just too dark and your eye simply goes to the bright spots in the sky. Thats the problem I see with most of the HDR shots I see today. The picture becomes more a statement about the technique itself than it does about the subject matter in the picture. The images should still be about the subject matter first and technique second. Most of the HDR work I have seen, the technique actually distracts you from the subject and this is a perfect example of that.

Yeah, I know exactly what you mean... I really didn't mean to have it end up like that but I couldn't get a balance between the sky looking good and the horse looking goof too! In the end I just settled for this... Still, I'm working on it and my technique is getting better and better!
 

jmdfd415

macrumors regular
Sep 9, 2008
150
1
Ok so ive been reading on how to do these so I figured I would give it a shot. Here is my first attemp. I dont have a camera so I used my girlfriends d40 even though I didnt really know what I was doing haha.
guitars23.jpg



I think it turned out ok. I just dont know if I like how the blinds turned out. Any ideas on how to fix that?
 

Smc1978

macrumors newbie
Feb 2, 2008
24
0
Having a go at HDR

Hi, was visiting london, thought I'd have a go with some HDR , Pictures are a bit blurry hence the lack of detail, had to balance the camera on railings and other things. Here are my first HDR attempts.
 

Attachments

  • HDR1.jpg
    HDR1.jpg
    62.1 KB · Views: 81
  • Untitled_HDR4.jpg
    Untitled_HDR4.jpg
    103.9 KB · Views: 87
  • Untitled_HDR2.jpg
    Untitled_HDR2.jpg
    102.3 KB · Views: 81

thr33face

macrumors 6502
May 28, 2006
381
0
Hi, was visiting london, thought I'd have a go with some HDR , Pictures are a bit blurry hence the lack of detail, had to balance the camera on railings and other things. Here are my first HDR attempts.

ok, let's look away from that blurriness and look at the hdr part:

take your last one f.ex.: soooo much blown detail and some parts are pure black.

the whole point of hdr is to prevent such things from happening.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.