Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

matt9013

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 27, 2013
333
16
Sorry for all these questions but I got my camera on Sunday and did a full charge of the battery. I have been playing with it on and off since Sunday. Either with the LCD on and sometimes off and the battery is already blinking. Is that normal? I thought these were supposed to last a very long time before needing a charge.

I turn the dial off. Am I doing anything wrong? Any settings to change to save battery? Is this how fast they really die?
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
57,004
56,027
Behind the Lens, UK
Sorry for all these questions but I got my camera on Sunday and did a full charge of the battery. I have been playing with it on and off since Sunday. Either with the LCD on and sometimes off and the battery is already blinking. Is that normal? I thought these were supposed to last a very long time before needing a charge.

I turn the dial off. Am I doing anything wrong? Any settings to change to save battery? Is this how fast they really die?
Depends on how much playing you have done! I wouldn't worry about it too much, but if your going to be out shooting for long periods (especially if its cold), its worth having a spare. Go with the branded ones though. You pay a bit more, but they last a lot longer.
 

kenoh

macrumors 604
Jul 18, 2008
6,507
10,850
Glasgow, UK
Think of it like an ipad. Battery lasts a while but if you use it heavily, it will run down pretty quick.

Sparw battery is my recommendation too, then just get to know how long it lasts and then enjoy it, stop worrying...

You will soon.be asking questions about composition, colour,contrast.... Then it is only plug ins then onto best raw processor... So get used to asking questions... :)
 

matt9013

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 27, 2013
333
16
Sweet thanks, Here is one of my first pictures I've taken with the camera. Not the best but I like it. IMG_0051.JPG
 

Mr. Buzzcut

macrumors 65816
Jul 25, 2011
1,037
488
Ohio
Without reading all the posts, I'd say go with a small DSLR that you feel comfortable handling. The mirror less cameras look good at first but they become much less portable with a decent lens attached and most of the lenses have poor aperture. You can always get a small prime lens for the DSLR if you want compact.

I may get flack for this, but I've found that I get decent enough photos with my iPhone when compared to a DSLR with a crappy lens. It's the decent lens that adds all the size and weight so I just don't bother carrying something in between the iPhone and decent DSLR kit.

Yes I see I've made decent use of the word decent.
 

kenoh

macrumors 604
Jul 18, 2008
6,507
10,850
Glasgow, UK
Without reading all the posts, I'd say go with a small DSLR that you feel comfortable handling. The mirror less cameras look good at first but they become much less portable with a decent lens attached and most of the lenses have poor aperture. You can always get a small prime lens for the DSLR if you want compact.

I may get flack for this, but I've found that I get decent enough photos with my iPhone when compared to a DSLR with a crappy lens. It's the decent lens that adds all the size and weight so I just don't bother carrying something in between the iPhone and decent DSLR kit.

Yes I see I've made decent use of the word decent.


Lol... no flack from me, each to their own but My Sony with a Leica Summilux hanging off it is teeny tiny compared to my old Canon with equivalent lens.

More and more it is personal preference. You are right, the laws of physics dictate that a lens is going to be larger for a given focal length/aperture but not everyone needs f1.2 on a normal or f2.8 on tele when you have image stabilisation etc. So each to their own. Anyway, I know nothing, I take crap shots whether it is a DSLR, phone, Point and Shoot, mirrorless or rangefinder... :)
 

Mr. Buzzcut

macrumors 65816
Jul 25, 2011
1,037
488
Ohio
Lol... no flack from me, each to their own but My Sony with a Leica Summilux hanging off it is teeny tiny compared to my old Canon with equivalent lens.

More and more it is personal preference. You are right, the laws of physics dictate that a lens is going to be larger for a given focal length/aperture but not everyone needs f1.2 on a normal or f2.8 on tele when you have image stabilisation etc. So each to their own. Anyway, I know nothing, I take crap shots whether it is a DSLR, phone, Point and Shoot, mirrorless or rangefinder... :)

I think it frustrates people when they can't get a clear shot of their kid or wildlife. Image stabilization does nothing for a moving subject.

People should absolutely buy what suits them. I do think some cell phone cameras are nearly as good as the entry mirror less and DSLR (with cheap lens). And they often crush P&S type cameras. Just something to consider.
 

kenoh

macrumors 604
Jul 18, 2008
6,507
10,850
Glasgow, UK
I think it frustrates people when they can't get a clear shot of their kid or wildlife. Image stabilization does nothing for a moving subject.

People should absolutely buy what suits them. I do think some cell phone cameras are nearly as good as the entry mirror less and DSLR (with cheap lens). And they often crush P&S type cameras. Just something to consider.

Absolutely... thing is photos of fast moving kids and wildlife is one of those situations where your simple seeming needs immediately catapults you into the mid to high end requirements spectrum... no, IS doesnt help with moving targets, for that a fast shutter speed and good panning technique is your best friend.
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
57,004
56,027
Behind the Lens, UK
I think the biggest problem with blurry shots isn't the cameras people use, but their inability to use them properly.
I learnt to shoot manual quite early on as I found aperture priority meant my shutter speed often dropped below an acceptable speed.
Once you switch to full manual mode you tend to look at these things and adjust your ISO accordingly.
Of course this is assuming your camera has manual settings.
The other thing people tend to do a lot is over crop. Either because they don't have the lens they need or they just didn't get it right in the first place. The more you crop, the worse your picture quality will become. Yes their is a trade off between the right composition and a bit of cropping, but if you crop three quarters of your image, don't expect a winner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kenoh

Ray2

macrumors 65816
Jul 8, 2014
1,170
489
A few thoughts. As others have pointed out, how you mesh with the camera is far more important than any bells and whistles. If you live in a bright area, LCD viewing can be problematic. My guess is you're shooting JPEG. If that's the case, make sure the Sony can provide files you like. Sony's jpegs vary all over the map depending on the model. I don't know the a5000 but 2 of the 3 Sony's I've had in the past I considered raw cameras only. The jpegs were worthless. If jpeg's are your standard format, consider Oly and Fuji. Sony has typically had issues with white balance and artificial lighting. If you're shooting when ambient light is from artificial sources, I'd make sure any Sony you look at can render shots without a yellow cast. It sounds like you're new to better cameras. You want one that has very good metering. I'm partial to Fuji and their metering is excellent, as is Nikon's. Again, the Sony's I've owned had mediocre metering and getting a perfect shot out of camera was very hit and miss.

Not to say Sony's are a universal bad choice. They're built like bricks, are cheap and the consumer lens line is affordable with decent choice.

At the risk of misreading your objectives, an RX100 might make a lot of sense. It tends to get it right with no user action and the files are lovely.
 

michael180

macrumors newbie
Nov 6, 2007
20
1
Santa Cruz, CA
I have two Canon 5D's and several "L" lenes, great cameras, but heavy and do not make great walking around cameras. I recently purchased a Sony A6000, and love it. It's light weight, and incredible focusing ability make it perfect for daily use. I'll continue to shoot the 5D's for landscapes and such, but so far the A6000 is my favorite.
 

MacRy

macrumors 601
Apr 2, 2004
4,351
6,278
England
Sweet thanks, Here is one of my first pictures I've taken with the camera. Not the best but I like it. View attachment 598352

Good start and welcome to the bottomless money pit club. You'll find some great people on here willing to offer you encouragement and advice, they certainly helped me out on my photographic journey.

Can I suggest that you amend the thread title to say that you've bought a camera so you don't keep seeing lots of suggestions on what to buy from people who haven't followed the whole conversation or taken the tl;dr approach to it.
 

Micky Do

macrumors 68020
Aug 31, 2012
2,217
3,163
a South Pacific island
Hello, I have decided to buy a camera. I mainly want this camera for nature shots, wildlife, family pictures etc. I had decided on the Canon Rebel T5 DSLR which looked really good and I can get some great bundles on.
I have recently been looking into some mirrorless ones from Sony and they also seem good and a bit cheaper than the Rebel T5. I am liking the Sony Alpha a5000

What would you guys recommend getting for what I want? I also have an iMac but no photo software and doubt I would do much editing besides playing around with it in Photos.

Thanks

TBH how a camera works for you is probably more important than the tech specs - I'd siggest you go to a store and handle some examples and see how the different flavours of ergonomics works for you between the different brands and models...

For a complete novice, going to a store, checking out a few cameras and talking to staff seems a sensible idea.

For what it's worth, my own path into digital photograph was this…..

Years ago I enjoyed photography on film, using simple fixed lens rangefinder cameras. My first was fully manual. It didn't even have a battery. I used a light meter to make the settings. Later I got a Ricoh which had some auto options, which could be chosen as desired. I liked the small, unobtrusive nature of the rangefinder. Although there were some situations where an SLR with a zoom lens would have been nice, I got enough good shots within the limitations of what I had to not be tempted.

I got some good shots…. people though they came from a much fancier camera. One picture of the local hunt meeting was blown up to 30 x 24" and still hangs above the fireplace of the pub where I took the shot.

Lesson: It's not about what you have; it's more about how you use what you have.

Living a somewhat itinerant life for several years put paid to much photography that needed a place to store negatives and prints. For many years I didn't take a photo at all.

I have a go with one of the first consumer digital cameras that came on the market back in the late '90's. It was very basic, with a resolution of less than a megapixel, and cost more than $500, a heck of a lot of money then. Friends bought it to make an on-line catalogue of their products.

When I got my first computer (the original 2005 Mac Mini) I started to look at digital cameras, but it was several years before I finally took the plunge and bought one…… in 2012. That was a $90 end of line special point and shoot Olympus TG 310, which can take a dunking and a drop.

I played around with that for a bit, finding out what digital photography was all about. I learned it's shortcomings and what I needed for what I want to do with a camera. Here are some photos taken with that:

PC060003.jpg
PC100007.jpg


I spent five times as much on my next camera, a Fujifilm X10, which I have since replaced with a Fujifim X20. While not being pocketable like the TG 310, the X10 and X20 are still easily carried around, and do represent a big step up in use and in image quality. The X20 has proven to be a worthwhile step up for me with it's very fast auto focusing, and negligible shutter lag. In use it is similar to the rangefinder film cameras I enjoyed in the past. Here are a couple of shots taken fem my apartment this morning and yesterday evening, and another used recently by the local newspaper (which uses quite a few of my photos in reports of local sports events).

Myna.jpg
S0028811.jpg
S0198770.jpg


As before, a DSLR would be nice, and one day I will probably get one, but to get a significant improvement on what I am using now would probably cost me five times as much again. However I am in no hurry; I continue to make the most of what I have, which fits my lifestyle and budget.

I just use iPhoto to edit my pictures…. Taking the photo is just the start. A bit of editing makes all the difference to the picture. One day I may get something more professional, such as Lightroom, but for now, again, I make the most of what I have.

I know several people with DSLR cameras that seldom get used because they find them too bulky, and because they don't have the time or patience to edit the results.

I would suggest you start out with something cheap'n'cheerful. From there you will find out what suits your style and needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ray2 and Grey Beard

matt9013

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 27, 2013
333
16
Cool, been using it a lot today outside and I'm loving the quality of the shots outdoors. Been using the viewfinder way more than I thought I would.

I have a question about printing though. I bought the Pixma Pro 100 printer and the semi gloss plus photo paper 13x19. I don't have a disc drive so I just connected it and downloaded the firmware/driver. My question is what's the best program to get it to print high quality prints? Right now I use Pixlr and Fotor to edit pictures. Do I just print directly from them? With how much ink is and the paper I want to get my prints right the first time. Size, quality etc. Or should I download a different program?

A non camera question but how can I change my topic title?
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
57,004
56,027
Behind the Lens, UK
Cool, been using it a lot today outside and I'm loving the quality of the shots outdoors. Been using the viewfinder way more than I thought I would.

I have a question about printing though. I bought the Pixma Pro 100 printer and the semi gloss plus photo paper 13x19. I don't have a disc drive so I just connected it and downloaded the firmware/driver. My question is what's the best program to get it to print high quality prints? Right now I use Pixlr and Fotor to edit pictures. Do I just print directly from them? With how much ink is and the paper I want to get my prints right the first time. Size, quality etc. Or should I download a different program?

A non camera question but how can I change my topic title?
Depends how much printing you plan on doing. Personally I just print straight from preview on my Mac. Select the paper type and best quality and away you go. If you want more control than that, get a RIP. Efi or photogate are two that I've heard of, but not necessarily IMO.
 

matt9013

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 27, 2013
333
16
Depends how much printing you plan on doing. Personally I just print straight from preview on my Mac. Select the paper type and best quality and away you go. If you want more control than that, get a RIP. Efi or photogate are two that I've heard of, but not necessarily IMO.
Thanks, messed around with the settings and was able to find those settings. Missed them earlier somehow.

Is it best to fit to paper or print entire image?
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
57,004
56,027
Behind the Lens, UK
Thanks, messed around with the settings and was able to find those settings. Missed them earlier somehow.

Is it best to fit to paper or print entire image?
Depends on the image and size. Fitting to paper can result in a stretched look if the aspect ratio of your image is different from your paper size. It shows a preview before you hit print so you can check and decided.
 

matt9013

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 27, 2013
333
16
Depends on the image and size. Fitting to paper can result in a stretched look if the aspect ratio of your image is different from your paper size. It shows a preview before you hit print so you can check and decided.
OK, thanks.
 

matt9013

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 27, 2013
333
16
Been having a blast with the camera and can't wait to start posting some pictures. I was wondering if external flashes are good? I've been comparing pictures with internal flash vs external and external seems better but I wanted to hear what others on here think. I was thinking of starting off with something like this though it seems big and bulky.

http://www.amazon.com/Neewer-Speedl...8&qid=1448787235&sr=1-1&keywords=camera+flash

I was also maybe going to spend a little more and get a canon speedlite as they seem small and not as heavy.
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
57,004
56,027
Behind the Lens, UK
Been having a blast with the camera and can't wait to start posting some pictures. I was wondering if external flashes are good? I've been comparing pictures with internal flash vs external and external seems better but I wanted to hear what others on here think. I was thinking of starting off with something like this though it seems big and bulky.

http://www.amazon.com/Neewer-Speedl...8&qid=1448787235&sr=1-1&keywords=camera+flash

I was also maybe going to spend a little more and get a canon speedlite as they seem small and not as heavy.
I have a couple of speed lights which can be essential for some situations.
Portraits and any situation where you want to freeze the action.
I would recommend doing a search on YouTube for different type of photography with a speed light. See if it fits what you want to do.
I will say that there is a step learning curve with using flash. It's also best put to use when off the camera on a stand and with a modifier like a soft box or umbrella. In other words buying the flash is only part of the expense. Also if your going to use it off camera, you will need to trigger it some how. A cable is pretty cheap to begin with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kenoh

guzhogi

macrumors 68040
Aug 31, 2003
3,772
1,891
Wherever my feet take me…
I have used a few Sony SLTs, and all have been good. I agree with those saying that they're expensive to fix, plus lack of lens choice. However, very good quality. Also, one thing I do like about them is they have built-in GPS. One feature I miss from iPhoto is that it also showed a map with pins indicating where you took photos. Pretty cool, especially for outdoors/nature pics.
 

Micky Do

macrumors 68020
Aug 31, 2012
2,217
3,163
a South Pacific island
Good start and welcome to the bottomless money pit club.


There are those for whom cameras and associated
paraphernalia are indeed a bottomless sink for money, but it doesn't have to be so. Look past the gear; look at what you want to do with a camera…… take photographs, of course.

Look at what you really do need for your kind of photography. Get good basic gear within your budget to do that, then make the most of it. It's not what you have, but how you use it that makes for a good picture.
 

MacRy

macrumors 601
Apr 2, 2004
4,351
6,278
England

There are those for whom cameras and associated
paraphernalia are indeed a bottomless sink for money, but it doesn't have to be so. Look past the gear; look at what you want to do with a camera…… take photographs, of course.

Look at what you really do need for your kind of photography. Get good basic gear within your budget to do that, then make the most of it. It's not what you have, but how you use it that makes for a good picture.

Couldn't agree with this statement more.
 

matt9013

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 27, 2013
333
16
Stupid question but is it safe to take pictures in the snow? I know everyone does it but I don't think the Canon SL1 is wheatherproof and I don't go in blizzards or anything. Is it okay to take it out in a little snowfall or when it's cold out? Anything I should do when I get inside afterwards like wipe the lens etc?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.