I used to care but now it’s not a must have. But like someone said, if we’re gonna pay high prices for these phones then we might as well have it
I’ve just very recently gone from a 12.9” 2017 iPad Pro to a 2018 11” iPad Pro and i absolutely cannot see any difference in terms of screen quality or refresh rate.I’ve had the first gen 12.9” iPad Pro without the 120 Hz Pro Motion and now with the 2018 12.9” iPad Pro with Pro Motion.
It was just a pleasant experience to glide through pages smoothly on such a big screen and on top of that, a slight improvement on Apple Pencil latency. It was probably the biggest upgrade I’ve had in terms of screen quality. So to me, that was a game changer on the iPad.
I’m not sure if the experience or the feel can be replicated on smaller screens. Like, sure it would be nice, but it also feels overrated at the same time. On an iPhone screen, I never once thought the 60 Hz refresh rate is bad or too slow.
(This could just be me justifying the upcoming iPhones without 120Hz screen haha)
Would love to hear other thoughts and opinions from this forum 🙂
I personally thought nothing of it, until I actually used it. Since then, I've never been able to look at my 60Hz screen the same way. 120 Hz genuinely makes a device feel futuristic despite being such a simple alteration.
A lot of people are saying the Apple Pencil feels better on 120 Hz, which is a fact, but by the same logic, that improvement has to extend to your finger on your phone as well. Maybe not to the same degree, but there is no denying that it would improve one's touch-based experience. And why argue against something good, even if it's extraneous and unnecessary?
I feel the same way about the notch. There are too many notch apologists on the MR forums. I understand it serves a purpose, see why it needs to be there and am waiting for tech to develop so Apple can hide their Face ID array without sacrificing functionality, but when people say they actually prefer a notch over an all-screen, seamless, truly edge-to-edge display, that's where they completely lose me. Like, why would you voluntarily prefer to have an experience that is objectively inferior?
I feel the same way about 120Hz. Yes it may not be necessary, and yes you can choose to settle for less, but why on earth would you want an objectively inferior experience by choice if it was made available?
Oh yea 100%. I don’t think anyone here (that I know of) is against a 120 Hz display or a smaller notch. I'd be surprised if I see one. Improvements in any way are still improvements and I'll welcome it with open arms.
(But smaller notch is a different subject so I’m not going to get into that here.)
It's just a wonder why some people make such a big deal about not having a 120 Hz display and I'm open to hear their opinions if they feel strongly about it. I still think the new iPhones are going to be good products that a lot of people will enjoy, with or without the 120 Hz.
I guess I’m just trying to refer to the classic advice on tech: If you need it now, and you see the value that improves your life, then just get it. Don’t always wait for the next big thing because there is always going to be a next big thing.
I think it's like someone else mentioned in this thread FOMO playing a huge factor in why people want 120Hz on their $1000 iPhone. All these tech reviewers talking about how "smooth and awesome" 120Hz is and then shoving a slowmotion comparison to a 60Hz display in our faces. Ofcourse it's noticeable if you shoot a video of it comparing it with a 60Hz display and then slowing that video down 5x/10x.I can’t say I’ve ever thought I need it on my phone. I’ve never noticed any issues with scrolling until I read on here that some really really need 120Hz.
Question: Does 120Hz use up more battery life? I'm assuming so, and if so it would be nice to be able to toggle it off for those folks that don't care so much about it. (I'm curious if any iPad Pro users have tried this)
Question: Does 120Hz use up more battery life? I'm assuming so, and if so it would be nice to be able to toggle it off for those folks that don't care so much about it. (I'm curious if any iPad Pro users have tried this)
I personally have never switched it off on my 2018 iPad Pro. But battery on iPads have never been an issue for me. On iPhones, it might be. We're just going to have to wait and see.
Oh, look. Another slow-mo videoYes. It's matter.
Yes. It's matter.
Yes. It's matter.
Slow-mo video are 100% pointless.Yes. It's matter.
Thanks for posting. There were times I could discern some differences, most of the time I couldn't. Based on that video, I would say 120mhz is for me, is something that would make little difference. (Clearly a nice to have, given a trade-off of battery life...it's not worth it.)I've decided, I'm going to show both sides of the coin, so to speak, and let people judge for themselves.
The argument, demo in favor of 120Hz display.
The explanation as to why motion recognition/depiction is very subjective, both by person and content, and how it has a diminishing effect.
For me, it's about producing the best absolute product as can be humanly designed and built. If 120mhz is not ready for prime time, if it needs to be flipped to the off position to save battery or doesn't work well in specific situations or needs a massive battery to sustain decent screen time thus making the phone heavier...that is not delivering an optimal experience....
It's not about "needing" tech for the value. It's about the relationship Apple has built with its customers and how it's currently not respecting them the best that it can.
Oh, look. Another slow-mo video
No, but I'm not claiming it's representing the actual experience.Slow-mo video are 100% pointless.
You need to see it in person or at the very least watch the comparaison with video running @ 120 fps with a screen @ 120 Hz or more.
This is indeed the aspect I was attempting to showcase.Thanks for posting. There were times I could discern some differences, most of the time I couldn't. Based on that video, I would say 120mhz is for me, is something that would make little difference. (Clearly a nice to have, given a trade-off of battery life...it's not worth it.)
----------------------The average user does not need or care about 120Hz on their phone, it's just a number that's hyped up so much by tech reviewers which make it seem like 120Hz is a requirement to have a great display.
Instead of hyping up the 120Hz display like they did on the OnePlus 8 Pro / Note 20 Ultra they should maybe mention the horrible display issues these display have when the brightness gets below a certain threshold and that Samsungs "fix" for the display issues on low brightness was literally upping the minimum brightness.
I also want to make clear that I'm not against it at all, it just has to be done right and shouldn't cause any other display issues.
I also very strongly agree.For me, personally, a high-quality, color accurate display is more important than a number like 120Hz.
Was playing around with high refresh android phones for a bit and was reminded why I like Apple, so eventually I switched again. But going back to the 60 Hz display was painful, whereas I didn’t even care before. It’s very noticeable to me.Yes it will, know why? Because if you haven't used a 90hz or 120hz display you don't know what you're missing out on.
Once you do you'll never be able to go back to 60hz, simple as that.