Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Relax guys. A14 Bionic will be so fast that you won't need more than 60hz. It will be capable of inseting extra frames into those 60 to emulate an 90hz pannel.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: I7guy
I’ve had the first gen 12.9” iPad Pro without the 120 Hz Pro Motion and now with the 2018 12.9” iPad Pro with Pro Motion.

It was just a pleasant experience to glide through pages smoothly on such a big screen and on top of that, a slight improvement on Apple Pencil latency. It was probably the biggest upgrade I’ve had in terms of screen quality. So to me, that was a game changer on the iPad.

I’m not sure if the experience or the feel can be replicated on smaller screens. Like, sure it would be nice, but it also feels overrated at the same time. On an iPhone screen, I never once thought the 60 Hz refresh rate is bad or too slow.

(This could just be me justifying the upcoming iPhones without 120Hz screen haha)

Would love to hear other thoughts and opinions from this forum 🙂
I’ve just very recently gone from a 12.9” 2017 iPad Pro to a 2018 11” iPad Pro and i absolutely cannot see any difference in terms of screen quality or refresh rate.
 
I personally thought nothing of it, until I actually used it. Since then, I've never been able to look at my 60Hz screen the same way. 120 Hz genuinely makes a device feel futuristic despite being such a simple alteration.

A lot of people are saying the Apple Pencil feels better on 120 Hz, which is a fact, but by the same logic, that improvement has to extend to your finger on your phone as well. Maybe not to the same degree, but there is no denying that it would improve one's touch-based experience. And why argue against something good, even if it's extraneous and unnecessary?

I feel the same way about the notch. There are too many notch apologists on the MR forums. I understand it serves a purpose, see why it needs to be there and am waiting for tech to develop so Apple can hide their Face ID array without sacrificing functionality, but when people say they actually prefer a notch over an all-screen, seamless, truly edge-to-edge display, that's where they completely lose me. Like, why would you voluntarily prefer to have an experience that is objectively inferior?

I feel the same way about 120Hz. Yes it may not be necessary, and yes you can choose to settle for less, but why on earth would you want an objectively inferior experience by choice if it was made available?

Oh yea 100%. I don’t think anyone here (that I know of) is against a 120 Hz display or a smaller notch. I'd be surprised if I see one. Improvements in any way are still improvements and I'll welcome it with open arms.

(But smaller notch is a different subject so I’m not going to get into that here.)

It's just a wonder why some people make such a big deal about not having a 120 Hz display and I'm open to hear their opinions if they feel strongly about it. I still think the new iPhones are going to be good products that a lot of people will enjoy, with or without the 120 Hz.

I guess I’m just trying to refer to the classic advice on tech: If you need it now, and you see the value that improves your life, then just get it. Don’t always wait for the next big thing because there is always going to be a next big thing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Oh yea 100%. I don’t think anyone here (that I know of) is against a 120 Hz display or a smaller notch. I'd be surprised if I see one. Improvements in any way are still improvements and I'll welcome it with open arms.

(But smaller notch is a different subject so I’m not going to get into that here.)

It's just a wonder why some people make such a big deal about not having a 120 Hz display and I'm open to hear their opinions if they feel strongly about it. I still think the new iPhones are going to be good products that a lot of people will enjoy, with or without the 120 Hz.

I guess I’m just trying to refer to the classic advice on tech: If you need it now, and you see the value that improves your life, then just get it. Don’t always wait for the next big thing because there is always going to be a next big thing.

I think the reason people make it a big deal is because of the kind of relationship Apple shares with its consumers. It's not like Samsung or OnePlus where if you get bored with one iteration of a product, you just hop across companies with no thought at all. Apple functions best as an ecosystem and its customers trust and invest in it heavily, with iPhones, Macs, AirPods, etc. There is an additional layer of trust its customers place in it, which is also what makes it such a juggernaut.

The flip side though, is that since people are so fully invested in it, they expect to be rewarded for it and that only means Apple being the best they can be. And to be honest, that's quite obviously not the case with the new iPhone 12 line up. After 3 years, dedicated customers want a few extraneous things to make them feel like they are buying into a real refresh, like a smaller notch and 120Hz displays. They want to feel justified and proud of owning the latest, greatest iPhones. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that expectation because of how much trust these consumers have placed in Apple with their time & money. This kind of brand loyalty also requires the brand to acknowledge the people who got them to that point.

It's not about "needing" tech for the value. It's about the relationship Apple has built with its customers and how it's currently not respecting them the best that it can.
 
I honestly don’t notice the difference between my iPad Pro and iPhone. When I switch to my Macbook however it’s definitely noticeable. I feel like 120Hz on a small screen really doesn’t have that much advantages. I can see why some people are upset tho, other phones have had this for over a year now.
If it were to come to iPhone then I’d personally disable it if possible to preserve battery life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kht410
I can’t say I’ve ever thought I need it on my phone. I’ve never noticed any issues with scrolling until I read on here that some really really need 120Hz.
I think it's like someone else mentioned in this thread FOMO playing a huge factor in why people want 120Hz on their $1000 iPhone. All these tech reviewers talking about how "smooth and awesome" 120Hz is and then shoving a slowmotion comparison to a 60Hz display in our faces. Ofcourse it's noticeable if you shoot a video of it comparing it with a 60Hz display and then slowing that video down 5x/10x.

The average user does not need or care about 120Hz on their phone, it's just a number that's hyped up so much by tech reviewers which make it seem like 120Hz is a requirement to have a great display.
Instead of hyping up the 120Hz display like they did on the OnePlus 8 Pro / Note 20 Ultra they should maybe mention the horrible display issues these display have when the brightness gets below a certain threshold and that Samsungs "fix" for the display issues on low brightness was literally upping the minimum brightness.

For me, personally, a high-quality, color accurate display is more important than a number like 120Hz.

I also want to make clear that I'm not against it at all, it just has to be done right and shouldn't cause any other display issues.
 
Question: Does 120Hz use up more battery life? I'm assuming so, and if so it would be nice to be able to toggle it off for those folks that don't care so much about it. (I'm curious if any iPad Pro users have tried this)
 
Question: Does 120Hz use up more battery life? I'm assuming so, and if so it would be nice to be able to toggle it off for those folks that don't care so much about it. (I'm curious if any iPad Pro users have tried this)

I personally have never switched it off on my 2018 iPad Pro. But battery on iPads have never been an issue for me. On iPhones, it might be. We're just going to have to wait and see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Question: Does 120Hz use up more battery life? I'm assuming so, and if so it would be nice to be able to toggle it off for those folks that don't care so much about it. (I'm curious if any iPad Pro users have tried this)

I personally have never switched it off on my 2018 iPad Pro. But battery on iPads have never been an issue for me. On iPhones, it might be. We're just going to have to wait and see.

It can't be switched off on iPads which will only use the higher refresh rate when necessary such as scrolling, pencil stuff, etc.

I don't think a higher refresh rate would make much of a difference on an iPhone which is already incredibly smooth compared to Android. I personally couldn't care less if the iPhone gets it or not.
 
Yes. It's matter.


There's something up with that video as I have an iPhone X and there's no way scrolling is that choppy (I wonder if it's exaggerated because of the framerate of the video itself). I switch back and forth between my iPP and iPhone and not once have I said "man I wish this X had Pro Motion". I've even turned off ProMotion and on my iPP 10.5" I couldn't tell the difference. On the 12.9" I can tell but it's a much bigger display. On the small iPhone displays I don't think it's that big of a deal.

iPhones have always been really smooth and whenever I always went into Best Buy to look at a Pixel or Samsung they were always so choppy. So of course at 120Mhz they probably look really smooth now.
 
I've decided, I'm going to show both sides of the coin, so to speak, and let people judge for themselves.

The argument, demo in favor of 120Hz display.


The explanation as to why motion recognition/depiction is very subjective, both by person and content, and how it has a diminishing effect.

Thanks for posting. There were times I could discern some differences, most of the time I couldn't. Based on that video, I would say 120mhz is for me, is something that would make little difference. (Clearly a nice to have, given a trade-off of battery life...it's not worth it.)
 
...
It's not about "needing" tech for the value. It's about the relationship Apple has built with its customers and how it's currently not respecting them the best that it can.
For me, it's about producing the best absolute product as can be humanly designed and built. If 120mhz is not ready for prime time, if it needs to be flipped to the off position to save battery or doesn't work well in specific situations or needs a massive battery to sustain decent screen time thus making the phone heavier...that is not delivering an optimal experience.

The bottom line, with so many customers (in the upper hundreds of millions), apple never be able (for the most part) to design a phone to the exact specifications of a broad base of that broad base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Oh, look. Another slow-mo video
Slow-mo video are 100% pointless.
You need to see it in person or at the very least watch the comparaison with video running @ 120 fps with a screen @ 120 Hz or more.
No, but I'm not claiming it's representing the actual experience.

I will admit, most (or all?) of the videos are a comparison, which acts as a distraction to the real point: are there enough frames per second to be sufficient? Read on, please.
Thanks for posting. There were times I could discern some differences, most of the time I couldn't. Based on that video, I would say 120mhz is for me, is something that would make little difference. (Clearly a nice to have, given a trade-off of battery life...it's not worth it.)
This is indeed the aspect I was attempting to showcase.

Yes, scrolling on Web pages, for example, will be more noticeable because of the varied/separated content. However, pay closer attention to the folder opening and app switcher/manager demos. Because they're transformations or shifts/movements of a single object, the motion appears more seamless and much less distinguishable (even at a slowed speed). The behavior is explained in the second video.

Ultimately, I think, the following is a fair statement of why the criticism of demanding 120Hz displays is valid.
The average user does not need or care about 120Hz on their phone, it's just a number that's hyped up so much by tech reviewers which make it seem like 120Hz is a requirement to have a great display.
Instead of hyping up the 120Hz display like they did on the OnePlus 8 Pro / Note 20 Ultra they should maybe mention the horrible display issues these display have when the brightness gets below a certain threshold and that Samsungs "fix" for the display issues on low brightness was literally upping the minimum brightness.

I also want to make clear that I'm not against it at all, it just has to be done right and shouldn't cause any other display issues.
----------------------
For me, personally, a high-quality, color accurate display is more important than a number like 120Hz.
I also very strongly agree.
 
Yes it will, know why? Because if you haven't used a 90hz or 120hz display you don't know what you're missing out on.

Once you do you'll never be able to go back to 60hz, simple as that.
 
Yes it will, know why? Because if you haven't used a 90hz or 120hz display you don't know what you're missing out on.

Once you do you'll never be able to go back to 60hz, simple as that.
Was playing around with high refresh android phones for a bit and was reminded why I like Apple, so eventually I switched again. But going back to the 60 Hz display was painful, whereas I didn’t even care before. It’s very noticeable to me.
 
let me tell you something incredibly important. iPad pro displays dont really stay at 120hz. Its most likely around 90 or 100. S20 displays locked at 120hz on the other hand are jaw dropping.

I tested this myself with my friend, we both went into an apple store and tried the iPad display. Meh, it was noticably smoother but nothing jaw dropping. Then we went and tried the S20 display with 120hz enabled and DAMN it was night and day difference. S20 stays locked at 120hz while the iPad doesnt. If Apple puts a 120hz display, they will not make it locked at 120hz like the S20, because it will be more power efficient that way, but let me tell you, theres a hige difference between the S20 one and the iPad one. Apples implementation os 120hz doesnt really do much for me. Samsungs does tho. I have an iPhone 11 Pro Max, not a samsung guy by any means by the way
 
I don't even notice it on my iPad Pro unless i really want to... so i doubt i would see a difference on the Phone.

Since i sit in front of a 60Hz monitor all day (work) and mostly use the Macbook at home, probably just got used to it over the years and it feels "normal".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.