5 years and 3 macs later. I've come to the conclusion, I'm not a mac person
Crossing fingers? Is the current version that bad?I used to upgrade when the newest version came out, but over the last several, I've upgraded one release behind the current one to give Apple a year to iron out the bugs. That doesn't even seem to be a safe bet anymore. I'm planning to upgrade to Monterey when Ventura releases, but with fingers crossed.
Same here. And there are the same type of quality issues with SwiftUI that have been discussed in this thread with macOS.5 years and 3 macs later. I've come to the conclusion, I'm not a mac person
"Bad" is subjective to the user and their workflows/needs, honestly. From what I've read, it's more a roll of the dice than past versions, but many have used it without problems. I could be one of those, too. And so could you. I certainly wouldn't let it keep me from grabbing that new MBP!Crossing fingers? Is the current version that bad?
I am about to buy a new MBP and it will likely come with current version with no going back, or the one just about to be released… Do they even load the new BTO’s with a (final/golden version) before public release MacOS is officially out? Which is a worse position to be in?
Many people say this. It's like M2 'SSD gate', where it's been argued barely anyone will notice because who on earth buys an MBA for serious work. And while there is room for this point of view, it kind of implies your average buyer is someone spending £1249 upwards on a computer for banal content consumption and incredibly light tasks. Zero evidence on my part, but I really can't believe that's true. That's what £300 Lenovos are for. People expect computers costing a grand or more to be capable of some pretty serious heavy lifting, and expect them to come with a solid OS which doesn't trip over itself.Apple probably focuses on the average user experience.
Most folks just turn their Mac on, browse the internet, maybe open an app or two for homework, Calendar, or spreadsheet. Occasionally plug in a thumb drive. Rinse and repeat.
Not trying to excuse Apple here, but I can easily imagine that a lot of bugs probably aren’t even noticed or cared about by most of the Mac user population.
SwiftUI is a different can of worms 🤪… If it is true that the new VenturaB
Same here. And there are the same type of quality issues with SwiftUI that have been discussed in this thread with macOS.
I’ve lost count now as I’m developing an iOS app of the number of broken SwiftUI features which I see on apple developer forums with 2 or 3 yr long threads with developers posting “still broken in iOS 13, 14, 15…”
Well it helps that Windows has a ton of apps that can do Window management at latest on par or better than Windows/Mac OS' natively. Though admittedly I've moved away from a lot of them. Stardock for instance comes to mind straight away. In terms of various options available through third party applications there's Windows & then there's the rest, no one comes anywhere close to it.Funny you should say that. I have to use Windows at work and I frequently mutter "when is Windows going to figure out how to deal with windows?" under my breath. I guess it all depends on what you're used to.
The timeframe coincides with WFH, I'm wondering if that is coincidence or a side effect.I've said this before, but the thing that really frustrates me is not that the bugs exist, but that they're not getting fixed. I've reported dozens over the past two years and Apple has only responded to two of them: One of those responses was to say that the bug had been fixed (it hadn't), and one to say that it's by design (it shouldn't be*). The rest of the bug reports have apparently been completely ignored.
*I figured out a sequence of steps that makes the Maps app pop up unexpectedly. I would never expect an app to open a new window of its own accord, whether by design or not.
This seems to be a problem/feature with interaction with Catalyst apps. You can get similar behavior between, for example, News and Stocks on Monterey.Hmm. There are a few apps that have that behaviour. Finder for one. It has to with the app/window model. In (original) Microsoft, the window is the app (you had at that time multi-subwidow horrors) and the menu is part of the window, but in macOS the app has windows (much better architecture) and a separate menu. The app is the menu. The problem is that people often act as if 'the window is the app" and they do not close the app when they want, they close the window (especially users having come originally from Windows). Some apps also quit when you close the last/only window (e.g. System Preferences.
Some apps like Finder make sure that when they are activated, a window appears so the nontechnical users (especially the users coming from Windows) get confused "I started Finder but there is no window" (there is only a menu but they don't see it). Hence, for some apps, such as Finder (which really is essential), you can close the last window, but when you activate the app again via the dock, it will create a new window. Maps behaviour is likewise: when it gets activated without a window, it creates one. Maps does it, Finder does it, Messages itself does it. Photos does it. Probably all Apple's own apps do this (haven't tested all of them).
It is illogical, but it is a feature making macOS much more simple to use for newcomers, most of whom will have experienced Windows before macOS. It also has the effect that if a user closes the last window thinking they close the app, the app stays still running and when they click to 'launch' it again, it launches lightning fast (because the app itself doesn't need to startup). The app itself can go into 'sleep' mode not drawing energy or using CPU) when the last window closes, so there is no real drawback.
Their communication to you about it is as dumb as hell, though. Rather not people-friendly. Why not have a we page somewhere that explains this?
Many people say this. It's like M2 'SSD gate', where it's been argued barely anyone will notice because who on earth buys an MBA for serious work. And while there is room for this point of view, it kind of implies your average buyer is someone spending £1249 upwards on a computer for banal content consumption and incredibly light tasks. Zero evidence on my part, but I really can't believe that's true. That's what £300 Lenovos are for. People expect computers costing a grand or more to be capable of some pretty serious heavy lifting, and expect them to come with a solid OS which doesn't trip over itself.
It's all about the 'premium price, premium product' image which Apple once prided itself on.
Now they're more interested in pairing-up with Kardashians to sell skin-coloured earphones, and we wonder why MacOS is going to hell on a handcart.
EDIT: I miss Snow Leopard
I know it's anecdotal on my part, but I know a lot of friends and family with $1000+ Macs and basic stuff is seriously what most people do with their computers, Mac or PC. The experience of a $300 Lenovo sucks no matter what you're doing. Most people I know just want a well built fast laptop that will last them a long time. Those who need extra performance for work typically have a work provided computer. Youtube and enthusiast forums make it seem like everyone is running Premiere, Final Cut, or Photoshop at the local Starbucks and hooking it up to multiple 4k Displays when they get home. I have yet to actually see anyone do this in-person on a personal laptop.
I'm a Civil Engineer and have a work provided laptop. I also have a $2500 16" MacBook Pro that I use as a glorified Safaribook. Heck, I know a family friend who lives 10 minutes from me who runs a restaurant and a small trucking business. She has a $2400 15" tb MBP just because she wanted a well built computer with a large screen. She loves it, but the most powerful thing she uses it for is Microsoft Office. She drives around in a $60,000 Genesis G80 but drives the speed limit. Again, most people just want something nice.
You lost me at 300usd laptop 😂I know it's anecdotal on my part, but I know a lot of friends and family with $1000+ Macs and basic stuff is seriously what most people do with their computers, Mac or PC. The experience of a $300 Lenovo sucks no matter what you're doing. Most people I know just want a well built fast laptop that will last them a long time. Those who need extra performance for work typically have a work provided computer. Youtube and enthusiast forums make it seem like everyone is running Premiere, Final Cut, or Photoshop at the local Starbucks and hooking it up to multiple 4k Displays when they get home. I have yet to actually see anyone do this in-person on a personal laptop.
I'm a Civil Engineer and have a work provided laptop. I also have a $2500 16" MacBook Pro that I use as a glorified Safaribook. Heck, I know a family friend who lives 10 minutes from me who runs a restaurant and a small trucking business. She has a $2400 15" tb MBP just because she wanted a well built computer with a large screen. She loves it, but the most powerful thing she uses it for is Microsoft Office. She drives around in a $60,000 Genesis G80 but drives the speed limit. Again, most people just want something nice.
If it ain't broke why fix it?! The only downside will be when important security updates are no longer supported for that OS.I’m still on Big Sur on my M1 MBP and Catalina on Early 2015, Broadwell. I’m seriously thinking about just keeping them at Big Sur until I’m forced to.
Having worked in the industry for a while and at sizable companies, my guess is that they looked at the severity of this, customer experience/impact, cost of fixing, and likelihood that folks would run into this and selected the best dropdown option in Jira (or whatever tool they're using) that effectively translates to "Out of all the issues we have on our plate, this is so low priority we'll never fix it. We're basically okay with this bug living forever so we're labeling it as 'by design.'"Just to point out how silly this is, here's my verbatim bug report:
And Apple's response:
Beggars belief...