Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Mine's three years old and still runs great. Just upgraded to Snow Leopard and everything works fine.

If it was 4 years old, it wouldn't be able to run Snow Leopard. Apple has a history of leaving users in the **** when it comes to standars, features, graphics cards and so on.

Having said that, I think the freshly upgraded iMac is probably the best iMac for a long time. It's slightly more expensive than it could be and some people hate the glossy screen, but at least it has a dedicated graphics card and an i3 processor.
 
If it was 4 years old, it wouldn't be able to run Snow Leopard. Apple has a history of leaving users in the **** when it comes to standars, features, graphics cards and so on.

Having said that, I think the freshly upgraded iMac is probably the best iMac for a long time. It's slightly more expensive than it could be and some people hate the glossy screen, but at least it has a dedicated graphics card and an i3 processor.

Come on... be realistic. How many 4 year old PCs can run Win7 seamlessly? Quit being disingenuous. And besides, just because someone can't upgrade to the newest OS doesn't mean that machine is instantly obsolete!
 
My four year old Mini runs Snow Leopard very nicely, all 64-bits of it.

Come on... be realistic. How many 4 year old PCs can run Win7 seamlessly? Quit being disingenuous. And besides, just because someone can't upgrade to the newest OS doesn't mean that machine is instantly obsolete!

I referred to PPCs that were produced until 2006, three years before Snow Leopard came out. The OP specifically asked about being future-proof.
 
Having said that, I think the freshly upgraded iMac is probably the best iMac for a long time. It's slightly more expensive than it could be and some people hate the glossy screen, but at least it has a dedicated graphics card and an i3 processor.

Slightly more expensive than it could be? Are you joking? The new iMac is a steal.
 
I referred to PPCs that were produced until 2006, three years before Snow Leopard came out.

And your point? Just because it can't run snow leopard, how does that make the system obsolete? How did Apple screw us? I am sitting next to a dual 2.0 G5 that runs just dandy on 10.5 editing television shows for major televisions networks in HD. Yup, that computer is definitely a POS now.

You said Apple screwed us by making their OS unable to work on older machines so I said to show me all these old PCs that run Win7 seamlessly.
 
Why not just buy what you want? I wanted a Mac so I bought a Mac. Cost wasn't really a factor at all. I don't buy many expensive items but when I do,I buy what I want--only way to be happy with your purchase.
 
And your point? Just because it can't run snow leopard, how does that make the system obsolete? How did Apple screw us? I am sitting next to a dual 2.0 G5 that runs just dandy on 10.5 editing television shows for major televisions networks in HD. Yup, that computer is definitely a POS now.

You said Apple screwed us by making their OS unable to work on older machines so I said to show me all these old PCs that run Win7 seamlessly.

How many 4 year old PC's run Win7 seamlessly...??

Millions... ;)

but it's not provable either way....so what was your point again?:confused:
 
How many 4 year old PC's run Win7 seamlessly...??

That's a good one.

Well, I'm really lost.

I have 3 Apple products, an iPhone, and two iPods. Well, people says : "it's very expensive compared with other mobiles or music players" After people tried it : "I want one".

Well, I really love my iPhone and iOS. It's a 3G, but it still runs very well.

If I can get almost the same with an iMac, I won't doubt anymore, and order it.

My problem, is gaming. I can't afford a iMac + PS3 + games, so...On the other hand, I'm playing, on mu crappy 6 year old PC, games like FEAR or Dragon Age at minimal settings, and I'm still enjoying them quite a lot.
 
Why not just buy what you want? I wanted a Mac so I bought a Mac. Cost wasn't really a factor at all. I don't buy many expensive items but when I do,I buy what I want--only way to be happy with your purchase.

This is pretty much the idea I have.

I buy all my tech to perform a role. My printer is wireless because that's useful with the laptop, it however doesn't do a great job of photos because I don't print photos, Photobox/similar do.

My laptop is a PC because it is always used in Windows, alway for work and it gets the crap beaten out of it in hand luggage, hence it's a 13" little HP.

I have a Blackberry Bold for work as it's the best pure e-mail and phone device bar none and it's actually quite cheap, especially when roaming.

We have a Mac for home because we need to run Logic. It just also happens to be the nicest device I've ever used.

As with all things, it's best to work out what you want to do with the device and buy accordingly. I've never got the whole Apple vs BB/Apple vs PC thing because different circumstances require different things.

For base level home computing though a PC will always be the cheaper option, not necessarily the best but you can get home functionality very cheaply with a basic PC
 
Apple allows users to forget about the hardware and just use the computer. I use a two year-old iMac at home, which doesn't have the latest hardware. Heck, it has two gigabytes of memory, and the current standard is four gigabytes. However, it runs really well, and after updating to Snow Leopard, it ran even better. Apple also offers periodic software upgrades in the form of patches or full-blown operating systems that also improve performance.
 
I usually upgrade about every two years, but with my current iMac I'm ready to upgrade in just 9 months. My next machine is going to be a Mac Pro with the 5870. I'm planning on it lasting at least 3 years, possibly longer if there is a new video card upgrade released during that time. Nothing is really future proof more than 3 to 5 years out at the max, but it is nice to buy something and not feel like it is outdated the day you buy it, which is how I felt when I bought this iMac with a 4850. That is why I won't get another iMac. The 5750 just isn't a two year card, and there is no way to replace it. Having a fast i7 means nothing to me if it isn't matched with a card that will last as long as the processor.

So to answer your question, get what you want. Get what will make you happy. Want an iMac? Get an iMac. Want a PC? Get a PC. I prefer Mac OS X, so I wouldn't be happy with a box running only Windows no matter how fast it is. If you are happy with Windows, get a PC.
 
Here's my take. I've used Macs and PCs over the last 20+ years. FWIW, I love my Mac and my latest one has served perfectly well for a couple of years now. However, how you define "future-proof" is the key:

1) Do you mean you want to be able to upgrade components as they come out with bigger and better; i.e., graphic cards, etc.? Then PC is for you, unless you are willing to spend the money on a Mac Pro.

2) Do you mean you want the computer you buy to be usable for a long period of time (up to 5 years) without having to spend extra money? If so, it's kind of a toss-up with a slight edge to Mac. A well-maintained PC will last a long while, but you have to be diligent about maintenance. Macs require less maintenance, but this doesn't mean no maintenance. I still have running computers on both platforms that are 5+ years old at the office.

3) Do you mean you want to be able to buy one computer now and not have to buy one for a really long time (beyond 5 years)? Good luck with that one. Computers go obsolete pretty quickly and you are always going to want the latest and greatest.

My advice is not to buy based on such a vague concept as "future-proof." Buy based on what meets your needs now and for the foreseeable future. If all you do is web browsing, email and basic Office-type tasks, either platform will do fine, both now and in the future. If you have specific needs, then you need to judge the platform based on how well it meets those needs. For example, I would never recommend Macs to an Accountant since there isn't any great software for them. But musicians and graphic designers? I think the Mac meets their needs the best.

In the end, it's all pretty subjective. Most people here will suggest a Mac. I do too because it's elegant, easy-to-use and relatively free of problems. But that doesn't mean that it's right for you. Try Mac out and see if you like it.
 
Macs

G4/400 Sawtooth with Radeon 8500 graphics: 9 years - works great.
G5 2.5 Dual: 5 years+ - still in daily use.

Self-built Athlon 2400 box: Lasted about 5 years with judicious parts swaps.
Self-Built Athlon 64x2 box: 4 years or so. Still theoretically functional.
 
when it comes to computers there is no such thing as future proofing it is that simple.

My second ever pc, i got about 7 years ago when i was like 15 years old and really in to tech. I maxed the hell out of this thing, did my research, convinced my parents to spend £2000 which is a lot of money for most families so the decision was not easy.

I thought i had done the right thing and it would really last but i was wrong. technology moved really fast and the pc i bought couldn't keep up after a couple of years.

After that i go in with the attitude of instead of making a £2000 computer last 6 years, buy a much cheaper computer, use it for a couple of years, then get another one for about say £500 and keep progressing like that. Over the full time period you will spend the same money but at the end have a better machine.

Instead of making your current computer last really long, save the money and get the next one more quickly.
 
Come on... be realistic. How many 4 year old PCs can run Win7 seamlessly? Quit being disingenuous. And besides, just because someone can't upgrade to the newest OS doesn't mean that machine is instantly obsolete!

If you're talking a C2D with a good amount of ram and a decently good video card, then millions.
 
Here OP I just made the decision for you:

neat_mac_vs_pc_mess.png
 
Here OP I just made the decision for you:

neat_mac_vs_pc_mess.png

Is that a wired mouse and wired keyboard on the computer on the left? As default design, I thought they (Apple) got rid of those wires. Only mandatory wire is "its power cord". And that's it... :)

.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.