I would quit because the board of directors had made a horrible mistake and I'd beg them to bring back Tim.
Well, at least they're updating the functionality of iWork. I'm surprised they even added XLOOKUP to Numbers honestly.Relaunch a modernized iWork. Build concurrent screen and webcam recording right into Apple Arcade (for game streaming. Get a GPU deal done with NVIDIA. Build some colourful rugged laptops aimed at kids. build an executive macbook air that has an eSIM for the serious road warriors.
🔎 apple mac sales decline 30% - Google Search
www.google.com
I appreciate your comments. I don't necessarily agree with them but it is interesting to read your perspective.I agree with some of this, but we have to be clear that Microsoft aren't arrogant, they're the people who created the biggest software market on the planet. I have a computer on my desk that dates from 1983 and it has a Microsoft operating system in it. They created and profit hugely from the biggest and most commonly used operating system in history, and they also produce the most popular business productivity software there ever was. It isn't arrogance, it's pride in what they do.
And yes, I am not a fan, but I respect great work.
Did they miss out on Windows Mobile or a new phone? Not at all. As the Zune proved, there were places even then that Microsoft couldn't compete, and when they get something wrong, they at least have the sense to know about it and pull back before sinking a fortune in it. By the time they regrouped, the market was lost not just to Apple but to Android and really, there was no room to compete.
As for Google, they trade in peoples' personal data because we give it to them. And because they can monetize it efficiently as they do, they know full well that nobody else can beat them. Because we let them. It is entirely down to us.
The comments about Apple are both right in places and far off the mark in others, but are all pretty much well rehearsed. All I can say is that for a business lacking drive, momentum, creativity and the spirit exciting product... well, I wish I had that amount in my bank account.
I don't like many of their policies and I don't like some of their business models, but damn, they totally understand their market, and they know where they belong in it. And I will say that like you, I wasn't excited much by anything in the new Apple world of stuff. Yes, the M-series chips are a breakthrough (they really are) but it's just new models of the same stuff. Except not. These are fast, capable, and astonishing things to hold and look at. And to do this in the adversity of collapsing markets, supply chain constraints, political and even judicial pressures... really, having matured with the market, Apple are still consummate operators in it.
As for divesting from China... I wish. The most populous market in the world, pretty much the universal production hub which exiting would do more damage to Apple than China? I'd rather see them organize an industry-wide divestment which would matter much more.
It really surprises me that anyone is using Aperture still. I can't imagine it works with RAW files from cameras that have been made since 2015, and the database for images and metadata is buried in a library. Everything is so controlled and it isn't as friendly for using simple finder searches as other methods.As a professional videographer I run into, and occasional hire, photographers all the time. I was hugely surprised to find that many, if not most, used Aperture for cataloging. This was years ago, before Apple killed it, but I decent key a guy in Montréal who still uses it.
I guess the same thing if I were elected president of the USA—show me all the secrets, ha, ha.
I’m so confused as to why the Pages app, for example, won’t let you collaborate without being on the absolute latest version, but logging on to iCloud.com with an old browser has no issues. It’s for this reason that my employer switched to Google DocsRelaunch a modernized iWork. Build concurrent screen and webcam recording right into Apple Arcade (for game streaming. Get a GPU deal done with NVIDIA. Build some colourful rugged laptops aimed at kids. build an executive macbook air that has an eSIM for the serious road warriors.
Adobe can import the entire library. That’s what I did a few years back.It really surprises me that anyone is using Aperture still. I can't imagine it works with RAW files from cameras that have been made since 2015, and the database for images and metadata is buried in a library. Everything is so controlled and it isn't as friendly for using simple finder searches as other methods.
That said, I know a lot of people really liked their Aperture, and remain fiercely loyal to it. It's really a shame Apple pulled the plug on it.
For cataloging (applying and making batch changes to metadata, sorting, editing, batch renaming, etc.) I use Photo Mechanic, which is the standard in my industry. It's a much more powerful and intuitive tool than Aperture ever was in this regard, and it moved so quickly, it's like the sports care of image handling. It can even apply soft crops and has a built in FTP so you can edit, caption, crop and send without ever leaving the app. If you don't need to do color correction or other post processing, it's unbeatable. Sadly they are going to a subscription model soon, and a lot of people are angry about that.
I hope the people who are still using Aperture are able to export their files and keep the metadata when they eventually migrate to another app.
Could you describe again what you are trying to say with this data point?
At the time of this reply the market cap was $2.64T while per share is $170.85. 52W high was $199.62 that would result in a market cap exceeding $3T.
You dislike Apple's success because the products you have enjoyed in the 1st 1-2 decades of your business relationship with the company does not comply with your requirements. Have you considered that your workflow is obsolete or not worth the Mac division's resources? If your specific use case only pushes <10% of all Macs then Apple's better off doing something else like a $650 MBA 13" M1 that will likely increase volume of Macs shipped worldwide.
Your use case may be as popular as the iPhone mini that a very vocal minority on MR and Reddit bewail about. It may sell a lot but in insufficient quantities for Apple to bother with considering they are a >$2.64T company.
Worldwide PC shipments totaled 241.8 million units in 2023, down from 284 million units in 2022.
As I pointed out the PC 5-6 year & Mac 4 year replacement cycle are the likely culprit.
Laptop & desktop shipments hitting a wall of ~quarter billion units annually may be an indicator of how important Macs & PCs have been for the past 16 years and counting.
Ah yes, this!The replies to this thought experiment are fascinating. So many are backwards-looking, just nostalgic "Apple should go back to doing what it did years ago" ideas in one way or another. Not a lot of forward-looking, revolutionary or new ideas in this thread. I guess that's a good reason why none of us would ever be recruited to do anything like being CEO of Apple 🤣
Ironic that so many who seem to wish for the good ol' days of "Think Different" don't seem to bring that philosophy here.
Saw your post within seconds of me posting almost the exact same thing... LOL!I'd fire the board for putting someone like me in charge.