non-Retina iMac is less laggy in gamesWhat’s the input lag compared to the older 2560x1440 iMac screens?
general use is nicer at Retina
non-Retina iMac is less laggy in gamesWhat’s the input lag compared to the older 2560x1440 iMac screens?
Do you know any specific numbers as far as difference goes? Thanks!non-Retina iMac is less laggy in games
general use is nicer at Retina
The retina display is one of the nicest things about gaming on the iMac. Going back to a low-res screen is just not an option once you're used to it.
How is the eGPU experience? Any stuttering or uneven framerate, or similar to internal GPU - only a bit slower?If you want a by product of spending that cash, sure, it will work
If you buy it for gaming, you are nuts, Actually if you got deep pockets get a razer core + 1080ti and plug that into the iMac pro..... happy times
Do you know any specific numbers as far as difference goes? Thanks!
QLED is only 60Hz so meh.... 120Hz IPS will be nicerAnother important issue is the new display technologies expected to go mainstream next year. Both QLED displays and HDR support will become more mature and common next year (look for CES 2018 in January), and both technologies give significant improvements to colour and contrast.
Also, we know Apple plans on releasing a new stand-alone display, and the iMac hasn't received any big updates (monitor, design) for several years now. 2018 could be one of those years with big improvements for the iMac line, incl. the new standalone display. Buying the iMac Pro not primarily for gaming, but being an important aspect, could give you serious buyers remorse a few months down the line.
Imagine buying an iMac Pro, and then 5-6 months later Apple releases an updated iMac with 6-core i7 8700k, and HDR-supported QLED screen, and possibly better thermal/fan system? Auch... These things make me nervous about such a big longterm investment. Don't know how easy it would be to resell such an expensive machine either.
The low-clocked 8 core CPU at 3.2ghz would most likely have a significant impact on framerates. The CPU has 1ghz of turbo boost, but i've yet to see any gaming benchmarks on how effective turbo boost would be. (Maybe turning off hyperthreading could help a bit, with Process Lasso.)
There are several QLED monitors with 144hz, but I can only find with VA panel. I don't know too much about this technology though. https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Curv...8&qid=1514306571&sr=8-1&keywords=monitor+qledQLED is only 60Hz so meh.... 120Hz IPS will be nicer
Actually, Nvidia is a horrible partner.Oh. Those kind of benefits.
It's hard to say why Apple hasn't used Nvidia chips for a while now (last model I remember was the GT 750M found in the MacBook Pro Retina before the M370X). Maybe Apple likes the performance model of AMD silicon, especially in OpenCL applications? I think it's just the fact that AMD offers a better price to performance ratio.
It's weird if you think about it. Nvidia is dominating the consumer desktop and notebook space while AMD's graphics technologies are found in every major console since 2013, every Mac since 2015, and now they're developing chips in collaboration with Intel.
VA it's something like cheaper technology than IPS, I wouldn't trust this solutionThere are several QLED monitors with 144hz, but I can only find with VA panel. I don't know too much about this technology though. https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Curv...8&qid=1514306571&sr=8-1&keywords=monitor+qled
I'd like to see a video of someone playing world of warcraft on it