Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You are opting in to the notifications but you can't opt out of the spying. That happens 24/7.

Your phone already "sees" everything on your display. By "spying" are you suggesting that iOS's ability to recognize a face or a plant or a dog or boobs to be a violation of your privacy?

This is technology running "on your device".

No Apple employee is looking at your content. Stop with the misinformation. You're doing nobody a service.
 
Built in weenie detector? Wonder how they trained that AI….

I officially have too much time on my hands:

IMG_6127.png
 
Why would I want to opt-in this?
It’s entirely likely you might not want to opt in. Parents with young children, on the other hand, may be quite interested in switching it on for their kids accounts.

Not every feature has to be applicable for every user. For instance, I don’t need the voiceover features designed for user with vision loss, but I’m glad the features are there.
 
It’s entirely likely you might not want to opt in. Parents with young children, on the other hand, may be quite interested in switching it on for their kids accounts.

Not every feature has to be applicable for every user. For instance, I don’t need the voiceover features designed for user with vision loss, but I’m glad the features are there.

That's kind of what "opt" means, no?
 
I doubt. Women are also interested in looking at cute n large cucumbers…

The key word is unsolicited. The point of this is to stop people from receiving unwanted nude photos, and yes, from what I know, it's not uncommon for women to receive random ones online.

I know there are a lot of jokes to make in this thread, but it's not too difficult to imagine how this could be a useful feature.
 
Sending nudes, over a medium in which screenshots are easily taken without your knowledge, is always risky--even to a longterm partner. There are much safer ways to go about something that has, in many ways, become the norm for most adults (sexting).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, this is bothering me. The images aren't sensitive. The content of the message isn't sensitive. And frankly it's insensitive to send something like that without solicitation.

It should say "You may be sensitive to this."

Or maybe, "This is a picture of the sender's sensitive bits."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
God please save us from all those boobs and wieners! Now show us dead bodies and heads rolling from point blank headshots! Cause god forbid gore and dead bodies be listed in Communication Safety protocol
My niece got nude pictures from boys at school when she was 14 that she didnt request and definitely didnt want. Is it ok if God saves her from those pictures? Or in this case Apple? There are some important real use cases for these.
 
The key word is unsolicited. The point of this is to stop people from receiving unwanted nude photos, and yes, from what I know, it's not uncommon for women to receive random ones online.

I know there are a lot of jokes to make in this thread, but it's not too difficult to imagine how this could be a useful feature.
Personally I’m not sure yet what to think of this option to block unsolicited nude photos automatically. Not that people should send/receive nude photos unsolicitedly. Don’t think that at all. But nude photos are just one of many sensory perceptions that we don’t want to be confronted with unsolicitedly. And what we manage to block online can still be perceived unsolicitedly offline. How many different sensory perceptions are we going to try to block? Are there perhaps also reasons to be carefully reluctant with preventing perceptions in our lives?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.