If you‘re in China or Russia, then the government is proud of you.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iOS 17 to Support App Sideloading to Comply With European Regulations
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
You can still use the iPhone the way it is. Just use the App Store and no other supplier.
I think Apple had the chance to innovate in this space while still avoiding Sideloading but chosen not to. They refused to tier their App Store services. Started making absurd demands to for instance game streaming services that in indeed were contrary to customers interests (big corp politics) … That hampered their cause that was otherwise not without merit.
Anyway will see how this is implemented. Who knows.
Last edited:
That fancy email app which on Android with the scary sideloading is available only on the App Store?
You cannot because the US model won‘t receive the iOS version that allows sideloading.
Case closed.
You clearly have no idea how Face ID nor Apple Pay works code-wise. And this is why such decisions are left for others to make. Not everyone in the EU government is unknowledgable, and they do have research groups who do not only assess the legal framework but have tech experts in it, too, above the average MacRumors self-prclaimed experts.
The policy is iOS and it allowing or disallowing code to be executed at the OS level, outside of the app framework.
If malware is to be executed, only Apple is to blame. Have you never read the part of „security fixes and speed improvements“ part of any app or OS update? That is what this is about because they don‘t even trust their own app review team.
And again, sideloading exists for almost any device that has been handed out by a capable company to their employee.
Oh, yes, right. Side-loading will open source us the iOS source code.
Now I will go back to watching idiots in cars clips.
A LOT of data privacy improvements Apple only did on the behalf of EU regulations.
You throw insults at the „imcompetent“ EU all you want but Apple is not interested in your privacy but instead interested and invested in your belief that Apple cares about it.
I have a Mac, and let me tell you: more than half of the apps I have installed on my Mac don't come from the App Store.
These are not apps that would violate the App Store rules in any way, it's just that the developer chose to distribute their software outside the App Store to "avoid the Apple tax".
Maybe that's good for these companies, but does it really benefit the users? As a user, the only thing I can see is the mess of having to manage installs, updates, and payment information in a thousand different places instead of one and having to deal with third-party installers that install junk and root kits everywhere in my system just to let me use their stupid service.
I'll give you a quick example of what I mean: Spotify on macOS.
Spotify as you know for sure is available on the iOS App Store, but not on the Mac App Store.
To get Spotify on your Mac you have to go to their website, download the installer and run the installer to install the app on your Mac.
The installer doesn't just install the Spotify app on your system, but also edits some system files (without your explicit permission) so that Spotify can launch itself automatically every time you restart your computer.
And this is just the start. Who knows what other junk is installed by these third-party installers. They all ask for the admin password, even when they install trivial, self-contained apps, and that means that they technically have permission to install junk wherever they want inside your system.
I seldom appreciate the fact that I can install whatever I want on my Mac, but I am often frustrated by all the third-party installers that try to install junk and adware and having to deal with third-party payment processing systems.
I don't want my phone to become like this.
Last edited:
Great I go back to the JB glory days of playing arcade Robotron via emulation on my iPad with decent controllers. Bring it on ASAP
It absolutely will make malware situation better.
Android and Windows and macOS allow for third-party software but they also have a lot of protections in place, from scanning the links through database of known malware (macOS Safari also does that) to features like core isolation, separation of root and user access, permissions model, etc.
It's about time for Apple to embark on that journey for iOS and to stop relying on manual reviewing of submitted software, which will make it more secure for all the customers, including those who don't care about sideloading at all.
Apple answer to the EU, not the other way around. Unless Apple chooses not to do business in Europe...
One core principle of microeconomics: competition is beneficial to the consumer. Well done EU, you made Apple swallow the hard pill this time.
I remember Apple caring about privacy WAY before the EU even started acknowledging the existence of potential privacy risks.
Apple actually pioneered many of the security solutions that we take for granted today (app sandboxing, full system and user data encryption, etc... they were built into iPhone since day one).
The EU is only good at brainwashing people, inventing stupid regulations that don't achieve anything substantial and instead stifle technology and innovation. You can thank them every time you have to click on one of those stupid "Accept all cookies" banners while fully knowing that they serve NO PURPOSE WHATSOEVER and that they don't make your browsing any more secure. Do you really think those people know what they are doing? They are as clueless as a bunch of Karens in a space Mission Control room.
Yeah that minimum wage guff they brought to the UK was a real bad idea ! Along with their working hours ideals - Bad EU !
There was a time the Mac was 'virus proof' but this was due to its narrow market share rather than security. Apple now controls something like 35-40% of the US PC market and are a much bigger target.
I've not been a fan of the iPhone 'infantilisation' either. Apple have done their job gaslighting a generation of customers into believing that sideloading is somehow going to destroy their iPhone and it reflects on their bottom line. There's nothing wrong with tech that 'just works' but its nice to unpick it and learn to solve your own problems too.
That's ok I guess. The problem is when they try to regulate things they don't understand.
When it comes to technology, the EU looks like my granny trying to build the Linux kernel from source.
30-60% markup is pretty typical in retail. On gadgets and nick-nacks it can be 2-300%. On consignment you might get get 50%
I was doing work for a small manufacturer who wanted Walmart to stock his product and they wanted 60% of the SRP on consignment which would have left him with a negative number for his trouble unless he could increase production x10 to lower manufacture costs with no guaranteed sales outlet.
Unless you are a mega-brand (e.g. Apple, Nike, Adidas) your profits from chain store sales is gonna suck.
It's also allowed apps that have greater access to drives, for example. Like the excellent DaisyDisk.
It's a valid point, but this problem is a testament to how bad macOS organizes stuff internally, and how atrocious Mac App Store is for developers.
Imagine if macOS apps would be properly sandboxed, and if Mac App Store was actually fair and inviting for developers?
I'm absolutely certain we can achieve both side-loading and convenience; Android is a good example of that, and iOS would probably be even better.
Any app that is pushed out of the Apple App Store will probably not stay on my phone. I think it’s more their loss than mine really.
When Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft will start producing general computing devices used by billions.
Which Microsoft kinda does, but there is a good reason why Xbox Series X with a ton of compute power costs $500, while their small underpowered ARM-based devkit costs more.