Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

iOS 18.2 Beta 2 Shows Siri ChatGPT Limit, Offers 'Plus' Upgrade Option

Have never paid for ClosedAI, don't use ClosedAI, and will never pay for ClosedAI, Apple should have never partnered with such a horrible anti-Apple TESCREAList company.
 
surfzen21 said:
As someone who skates, that board looks like an absolute mess.

The angle of the nose is beyond ridiculous. I coudlnt even imagine trying to nollie on something like that and I ride a board with a shovel nose that has more angle than most. The front truck is placed into the curve of the nose. The wheels look like 4 different sizes and not from normal skating wear. Back truck looks to be turned the wrong way and placed way too far from the tail. The tail is completely flat. The edge of the board by the toe/claw is bending.
Click to expand...
Not to mention the fictional monster… 😉
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Skoal and surfzen21
Yeah I’m sticking to my 14 Pro for a few more years. Not missing a thing about this weird collaboration between Apple and OpenAi.
 
It let me sign in with my Team account now! I get Plus through my work so this is cool. Yay :)
 
I am not sure I would use 20 dollars per year but I have not found a good place for free photo uploads to Dall-E or other high res models and playground is dismal in what i cannot do. So I will experiment for one month with this new feature as part of beta testing. I am pleased I can now upload multiple photos to the account it let me create the plus account with apple so the email is fake but comes to me at apple like that security. Here is a couple I made still working on refining the face.

45A69FC6-6B11-4220-B6CA-20658581CDB1.png
EB5CA024-A0CD-45B2-87D3-C73CBB6349CE.png
 
In regard to subscription price, this is no different than just using ChatGPT directly using their app. It's just more convenient now that it's baked into Siri.

I usually balk at additional subscriptions but this is for a non-Apple pre-existing service. At this point, Apple isn't even adding a surcharge. I think many people will be just fine with the free version but I think folks will find this more and more useful.

This is very different than artificially limiting hardware artificially to charge a fee, such as in the auto industry where if you want heated seats you've go to pay a monthly fee in some cases to get that feature which is already installed.

Chatgpt is a service many find useful that requires constant, expensive development so I think a subscription in this case is justified.
 
  • Love
Reactions: rjjacobson
That‘s not very Apple like. In this case i am not going to use it. It does not offer enought benefits for me like iCloud does.
 
grantishere said:
Having limits tied to your device requires some sort of identifier, which identifiers are not just used for limits...
Click to expand...
The intelligence on device knows how often a user has used it and will simply refuse any requests over the limit. This isn’t even a difficult problem, it would only be thought challenging to those who believe that AI is ONLY for the cloud which, of course, requires identifiers to be handed back and forth.
 
antiprotest said:
And it has already been stated that once you sign in, the OpenAI privacy policy applies. So the privacy aspect might become just a token gesture, if one really uses the feature and needs to sign in.
Click to expand...
Not really. While some people can’t live or breathe without consulting with ChatGPT on whether they should or not, the vast majority will be making privacy protected queries about any number of topics/subjects. Those concerned about OpenAI don’t have an OpenAI account and would never sign in because… they don’t have an OpenAI account. :)

EDIT:
Reading other stories about ChatGPT, I found this. “It can be a friend, a therapist, a mentor, a tutor, just everything.” Those are the folks that would very happily sign in using their OpenAI credentials darn the privacy!
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: antiprotest
RALentz said:
We need a setting to default to the 'basic' level so we don't use up the daily limit of more advanced queries with simple stuff until we actually need the power.

-R
Click to expand...
The default IS the basic level. You’d be notified if anything was going to go to ChatGPT and you could refuse at the point of the request.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rhyme2
I"m confused, what is the real use of this AI stuff, to make some weird pictures and some emoji's that's so tiny and the take over of grammarly thingy?
 
Last edited:
ProbablyDylan said:
But it still works after you hit the limit. Per the article, it simply degrades the user to a lesser version of ChatGPT. My question was if there was a difference in capabilities between these two models when used by Siri?
Click to expand...
If you ever get a reply to this I’d like to see it. This was my question too - what are the actual differences in functionality?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ProbablyDylan
Unregistered 4U said:
The default IS the basic level. You’d be notified if anything was going to go to ChatGPT and you could refuse at the point of the request.
Click to expand...

The article references two different levels of ChatGPT processing power that a non-subscribed user has: "Users have access to a small number of requests that use the most advanced ChatGPT capabilities, and requests are downgraded to a basic version of ChatGPT after that."

By default a ChatGPT request should go to the basic level, with the ability to select which level when it asks us about sending the query to ChatGPT. (If that is current behavior, my apologies, that's not clear from the article.)

-R
 
Son of a !!!!!!!!
Knew this whole unlimited chatgpt usage I was wilding out last week was too good to be true
ARRRHGGGH
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back