Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

teknikal90

macrumors 68040
Jan 28, 2008
3,383
1,944
Vancouver, BC
I think it will end up in a continious race between advertisers and adblockers.



I agree. There are some sites I don't visit anymore because they have more ads than text.
unfortunately the sites will win this one. they have more incentive. the harder they fight, the more ad revenue.
the ad blockers.... have zero incentive to keep fighting for the sake of your $0.99 that you had already paid them when you first bought the adblock software
 

Hippocrates

macrumors member
Jun 12, 2012
95
33
I think 1blocker deserves a re-test and re-rating.

I was using purify until it started to break too many webpages and the developer did not bother to fix them after repeated reports. Then I tried several other free solutions like Adblock fast, Safari Adblocker by dolphin, Adguard and finally settled on 1blocker.

It doesn't break any of my frequently visited websites, and it's as fast as purify. I don't see any flaw with the problematic websites listed in the review here too.

The only annoyance is that it doesn't block ad by the deck by default. One has to create a custom rule for that. I dislike the fact that 1blocker is choosing what it deems to be appropriate for the customers.

Other than that, the developer is responsive to queries and suggestions. So I purchased the in app upgrade to show a little support and hope that he will continue to do better.
 

gaanee

macrumors 65816
Dec 8, 2011
1,435
249
Weblock is not a content blocker. It blocks ads using VPN profile. They can but may not be watching your traffic. Content blockers offers a better way for blocking ads, tracking without re-routing your traffic.
BTW, this thread is mini reviews of content blockers.

Why not use Weblock ? It blocks ads in apps too.
 

max2

macrumors 603
May 31, 2015
6,421
2,044
Weblock is not a content blocker. It blocks ads using VPN profile. They can but may not be watching your traffic. Content blockers offers a better way for blocking ads, tracking without re-routing your traffic.
BTW, this thread is mini reviews of content blockers.

Are you sure about it blocking ads using a VPN profile ?
 

C DM

macrumors Sandy Bridge
Oct 17, 2011
51,392
19,461
Are you sure about it blocking ads using a VPN profile ?
Yes. It something that existed before iOS 9 when content blocking wasn't even available. It's a whole different thing.
 

ardchoille50

macrumors 68020
Feb 6, 2014
2,142
1,231
Yes, they use VPN profiles. Another issue is that it is much slower than a native content blocker for iOS because they need to re-route your traffic.
Also, content blockers cannot see your browsing history, so they can't "phone home". This cannot be said for using a VPN, your traffic is re-routed to.. where? You don't know and, therefore, the security of your data is much lower.

I wouldn't use a VPN for all of the tea in China unless I controlled every aspect of the network.
 

max2

macrumors 603
May 31, 2015
6,421
2,044
My connection is no slower with Weblock. Plus it is not a VPN like you all said.

How does it work?
Every time you visit a website or launch an app, your device connects to multiple locations over the Internet for online content. That includes configuration, media, text, scripts, etc. In most cases and by default all these connections are made directly to different servers with available Internet connection, like Wi-Fi or cellular. All modern operating systems (including iOS) allow you to configure a PAC script, which defines how you connect with the Internet. The PAC (Proxy Auto Configuration) file tells your device how to connect to different locations on the Internet, depending on the URL or IP address of the destination server. Weblock creates, manages and hosts your personalized PAC file. Any time you attempt to connect to some location, its address is matched with your custom PAC file. If the location is listed as blocked - your connection will be automatically routed through a dummy proxy server. This makes the connection impossible and the undesired content gets blocked. This method gives you the possibility to block only unwanted parts of websites/apps while allowing everything else. Weblock allows you to route requests for this undesired content through the dummy proxy, while keeping direct connection for everything else.
 

max2

macrumors 603
May 31, 2015
6,421
2,044
It's a proxy essentially.

Thanks. I am not sure if I am going to use it or not.

Hopefully Ad Guard comes out with something better to be able to block all ads not just ads in Safari.
 

kagharaht

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2007
1,708
1,402
I think 1blocker deserves a re-test and re-rating.

I was using purify until it started to break too many webpages and the developer did not bother to fix them after repeated reports. Then I tried several other free solutions like Adblock fast, Safari Adblocker by dolphin, Adguard and finally settled on 1blocker.

It doesn't break any of my frequently visited websites, and it's as fast as purify. I don't see any flaw with the problematic websites listed in the review here too.

The only annoyance is that it doesn't block ad by the deck by default. One has to create a custom rule for that. I dislike the fact that 1blocker is choosing what it deems to be appropriate for the customers.

Other than that, the developer is responsive to queries and suggestions. So I purchased the in app upgrade to show a little support and hope that he will continue to do better.

I've tried the latest release. All it did was slow my browsing to a crawl. Having to go through their proxy server seems to affect browsing speed. You also have to log out and log back in to wifi to enable and changes. It doesn't even support new iOS 9 content blocker feature for Safari add on.
 

C DM

macrumors Sandy Bridge
Oct 17, 2011
51,392
19,461
I've tried the latest release. All it did was slow my browsing to a crawl. Having to go through their proxy server seems to affect browsing speed. You also have to log out and log back in to wifi to enable and changes. It doesn't even support new iOS 9 content blocker feature for Safari add on.
What app/service are you referring to?
 

Crusoe

macrumors regular
Feb 6, 2014
166
54
Just tried Magic. I like the range of configurable options, and it seems pretty thorough at removing ads, but on the sites I visit it was definitely slower than Crystal (albeit Crystal doesn't block cookie warnings).
 

ardchoille50

macrumors 68020
Feb 6, 2014
2,142
1,231
I just tried Magic and it works great. However, websites load slightly slower than Purify - and I do mean slightly. The reduced speed is not enough to be an annoyance but I have been using Purify for so long that I can see a speed difference with Magic.. I can live with it :) Magic also removes white space along with the ads, which is ideal on smaller screens in order to reduce scrolling.

Overall, I like Magic. Thank you, @Magic App
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.