Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
question for those who bought the 2017 ipad:

when you check the warantee status, how Apple called the ipad? The 2017 ipad?
 
This would have been a massive instant-buy with touch id 2nd gen and fully laminated display with antireflective coating.
 
One thing I've been impressed with is the battery life. (See attached screenshot). My iPad 2 had incredible battery life, but my iPad Air always seemed to be lacking. It would lose noticeable battery life in standby, even when new.

Meanwhile this 2017 iPad has been trucking along; look at those standby numbers and still at 35%. Being not a heavy user means I like being fairly sure it won't be dead when I pick it up after not touching it for a couple days.
IMG_0014.jpg
 
Apple pretty much defined the touch experience with all of its iOS products. The question is how to bring it to the next level - the "Pro" level. They already have the Pencil and Smart keyboard, what's next would be to encourage developers to really build those fully-featured touch versions into iOS. I strongly believe the main reason why it isn't happening is because there isn't much profit potential - iOS users are conditioned to pay very little for apps, and are unlikely to pay e.g. US$40 or more for a fully featured "Pro" app.

Conversely, the subscription model is alien to many "pro" users who prefer to pay the full up-front cost for an App, although this is slowly changing.

I'm still looking forward to a dedicated "Pro" App store. It would clearly demarcate apps for Professional (literally money-making, not the marketing monikor) purposes.
This could work in U.K.
'Pay your pro apps over 3years finance'
 
This means that the iPad Air 2 is the "best" iPad Apple has ever made (at this point). It's already 2.5 years old and it's very close in performance to the 2017 iPad (with a one year old processor though).

Due to the 2GB of RAM in both devices, I think Apple will retire both at the same time (like it did for iPad 2 and 3). The iPad 2 may have been supported for so long, but most of the iOS updates were actually very slow on it. On the other hand, the iPad Air 2 is still so speedy today and has almost all the latest iOS functionality!

Honestly, I won't be surprised if the iPad Air 2 remains supported far longer than the iPad 2. Apple built it too darn good.

The next contender for the best future proof device is the 12.9" iPad Pro. With a monstrous 4 GB RAM and still a very powerful chip, that thing would probably go for years before iOS updates start to feel sluggish.
 
This means that the iPad Air 2 is the "best" iPad Apple has ever made (at this point). It's already 2.5 years old and it's very close in performance to the 2017 iPad (with a one year old processor though).

Due to the 2GB of RAM in both devices, I think Apple will retire both at the same time (like it did for iPad 2 and 3). The iPad 2 may have been supported for so long, but most of the iOS updates were actually very slow on it. On the other hand, the iPad Air 2 is still so speedy today and has almost all the latest iOS functionality!

Honestly, I won't be surprised if the iPad Air 2 remains supported far longer than the iPad 2. Apple built it too darn good.

Apple has used SoC as the factor to stop providing iOS updates. iPad 2 and iPad 3 both use A5 generation SoC and both were excluded from iOS 10 support. iPhone 5 and 5c both use A6 and are excluded from iOS 11 support. RAM has never been the determining factor in iOS updates.

I'm not sure how the iPad Air 2 can be considered the "best" iPad or "built it too darn good." It was not popular with education like the iPad 2 was. The iPad Air 2 is no longer offered through Apple's education channel. I would be surprised if it received any special treatment. It's just another A8 generation device like the iPhone 6 and will stop receiving iOS dates by 2018.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeatCrazy
Naturally, Apple can decide when they want to pull the plug (perhaps using SoC as you've said). But RAM often slows down a device if it is updated to an iOS version that requires a certain level of RAM for optimal speed. In addition to other factors.

The iPad 2 may have lasted through to iOS 9, but it was already considerably slower for a few of those updates at that point. Made sense to retire it as it was already highly constrained. The iPad Air 2 hardware wise, is still very speedy even though it's almost 3 years old. The new iPad Apple just released is similar in terms of hardware. If Apple chooses to support that iPad for a number of years and is able to run new iOS versions optimally, the iPad Air 2 shouldn't have any performance issues.

I'd be very surprised if the iPad Air 2 doesn't get supported longer than the iPad 2 did.
 
Last edited:
Apple has used SoC as the factor to stop providing iOS updates. iPad 2 and iPad 3 both use A5 generation SoC and both were excluded from iOS 10 support. iPhone 5 and 5c both use A6 and are excluded from iOS 11 support. RAM has never been the determining factor in iOS updates.

I'm not sure how the iPad Air 2 can be considered the "best" iPad or "built it too darn good." It was not popular with education like the iPad 2 was. The iPad Air 2 is no longer offered through Apple's education channel. I would be surprised if it received any special treatment. It's just another A8 generation device like the iPhone 6 and will stop receiving iOS dates by 2018.
I highly doubt the A8 will stop receiving updates by 2018. Apple is only cutting support to A6 this year and then there's still the A7. The A8 will probably updated until 2019 at least. Probably longer. The Air 2 is aging much better compared to Apple's older models. In fairness, aside from iOS 8, the Air has also aged more gracefully compared to previous generations.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.