Do we KNOW the gamut is inferior? Do we KNOW we aren't just used to the high-contrast, high-saturation look of the older screen and when presented with a more neutral screen we find it "off"?
You have to consider whether the device as a whole is better for you. For people not that concerned with the gamut, lots of people happily use the Mini 1 despite is SD screen, its overwhelmingly a better device. For others the Air is a better device, and for those who want the Air's screen, in the Mini 2's body, well
Image
Do we KNOW the gamut is inferior? Do we KNOW we aren't just used to the high-contrast, high-saturation look of the older screen and when presented with a more neutral screen we find it "off"?
You get what you pay for.
You get what you pay for.
Do we KNOW the gamut is inferior? Do we KNOW we aren't just used to the high-contrast, high-saturation look of the older screen and when presented with a more neutral screen we find it "off"?
There's NOTHING wrong with that display! It looks so good, I might have to run over to Best Buy....or Shenzhen. Maybe not Shenzhen.Ipad mini retina on top. Ipad Air on bottom. I see it a little but to me it looks like it's where it should be. Mine came directly from Shenzhen so it could be using a different panel.
I just realized the photo didn't upload.
Can you post that pic to this thread so we can compare on our devices?Ipad mini retina on top. Ipad Air on bottom. I see it a little but to me it looks like it's where it should be. Mine came directly from Shenzhen so it could be using a different panel.
I just realized the photo didn't upload.
Can you post that pic to this thread so we can compare on our devices?
I'm sorry, I meant the original source photo that you are displaying on your iPads. I wanted to bring up the same hot air balloon pic on mine.It's there now. Didn't realize it didn't post earlier.
Ipad mini retina on top. Ipad Air on bottom. I see it a little but to me it looks like it's where it should be. Mine came directly from Shenzhen so it could be using a different panel.
I just realized the photo didn't upload.
that doesn't work with apple products! You get less than what you paid for!
I'm sorry, I meant the original source photo that you are displaying on your iPads. I wanted to bring up the same hot air balloon pic on mine.
To my eyes, the blues and reds are off. The difference in saturation wouldn't bother me, but the red on the mini seems orange and the blue sky looks a bit cyan compared to the air.
It's funny....people seem to think that all retina screens should be equal, when the fact is nothing is further from the truth.
Those iPhone displays? They come in at 1136x640 in a 4" display (now on the second generation of 4" retina displays - really 4th if you don't consider adding pixels to the top as difficult engineering wise).
Those iPad air displays? They come in at 2048x1536 in a 9.7" display (now on the third generation of such displays).
Those iPad rMini displays? They come in at 2048x1536 in a 7.9" display (the FIRST generation of such a display).
Before we go off the wall and berate Apple for allowing such nonsense or blaming them for doing this on purpose, lets realize - this is a FIRST generation display tech. Name another tablet in this size range with a display resolution at this level? Name another tablet that has a similar display res that's anywhere near as thin, light and powerful.
You guys are ridiculous. The iPad has been around for THREE AND A HALF YEARS. Seriously? We're going to go apes*** because a FIRST gen display doesn't produce PERFECT colors???
It's actually a step up from the first gen mini as far as color reproduction goes. And while not on par with the more mature panels of the Air, its getting there, outpacing the first gen in every other display quality category (contrast ratio, white balance etc).
If you don't like it, don't buy it. But for the love of God, to whine the way you people do is unbelievable.....if there are better products out there, get one of those. If not, you really have no reason to be upset.
Unless they wanted to increase the thickness (ala iPad 2 > iPad 3 which wasn't a terribly popular decision)
Just letting you know....they did increase the thickness, and weight
Has anyone even considered that this could be an actually technical limitation of the screen technology and therefore unavoidable? Since the pixel density is so high is it even capable of producing truer colors let alone keep the same power consumption? I'm no expert but is there a 7 inch tablet on the market that has equal or higher PPI, produces better colors, same battery life, and similar form factor? I mean something has to give here and would any of you trade one of the other limitations for the more accurate colors?
If you answer yes then why didn't you buy the Air?
Just letting you know....they did increase the thickness, and weight
It's unnoticeable.....the difference in each instance isn't comparable.
As for your above post - I explained why the iPad 3's display was better on gamut. Because of the sacrifices made elsewhere (battery life, form factor, heat).
So Apple decided not to do that this time and instead put the best display they could mass produce as of now in the rMini. You can bet next year we'll see a display that produces more accurate colors as they'll have the time between now and then to figure it out and perfect.
EDIT: Just for reference sake.....
Differences between iPad mini and iPad mini retina = 0.3 mm added thickness, 23 grams added weight
Differences between iPad 2 and iPad 3 = 0.6 mm added thickness, no added weight for wifi model (however those models weighed 601 grams.....TWICE what the retina mini weighs).
http://youtu.be/6v2L2UGZJAM
If some of you would not mind, would you watch this video and let me know what you think rMini versus Air. Please make sure it is HD resolution when you watch.
Thanks.