Who is “we” and why do they “need” to?
The future of Mac is iPad Pro. It needs to be treated that way by Apple.
Who is “we” and why do they “need” to?
The future of Mac is iPad Pro. It needs to be treated that way by Apple.
Well, I don’t necessarily believe the future of the Mac is an iPad Pro…. however, I do believe the future of computing in general is the iPad Pro for Apple.The future of Mac is iPad Pro. It needs to be treated that way by Apple.
… and using which apps/in which area?Who is “we” and why do they “need” to?
… and using which apps/in which area?
ipad os is the limiting factor. There is already a ton of wasted space on a 12.9 inch display, 32 would be next level waste. Again, the current M1 with up to 16gb of ram is overkill for the capabilities of the os.I'd be happy to see a 32" iPad with 64GB RAM and an M2 Max processor.
We really need to be pushing ahead of the legacy Mac platform now and driving people to transition to iPad.
I keep hearing that…
Why is it a mediocre tablet?
I love my iPad, but , I might consider moving to something more convetional, mostly out of curiosity… It seems windows doesnt work for touch first right? Since, iPad is moving very closely to laptop teritory (I just discussed if there are any real things iPad cant do already), and… well.. for me it seems to sort of be a main computer already, but
i am always opet to new things
ipad os is the limiting factor. There is already a ton of wasted space on a 12.9 inch display, 32 would be next level waste. Again, the current M1 with up to 16gb of ram is overkill for the capabilities of the os.
The future of Mac is iPad Pro. It needs to be treated that way by Apple.
Agree. I’ve seen a lot of movies that depict the future, there is almost never a MacBook in any of them. ?
In all seriousness, keyboards are archaic as an input device. Jobs did want us typing on the screen as a transition. If voice recognition was further along combined with gestures, we’d be closer to the end state. Like combustion vehicles, the fade away will be a slow burn, but you can’t stop progress.
Like transportation, there will always be a need for a horse, but very few of us have ever used one.
Agree. I’ve seen a lot of movies that depict the future, there is almost never a MacBook in any of them.
In all seriousness, keyboards are archaic as an input device. Jobs did want us typing on the screen as a transition. If voice recognition was further along combined with gestures, we’d be closer to the end state. Like combustion vehicles, the fade away will be a slow burn, but you can’t stop progress.
Like transportation, there will always be a need for a horse, but very few of us have ever used one.
Westworld, Parks and Rec, Tera Nova, Star Trek, nearly all depict glass and metal devices with gesture and voice input.There is hardly a tablet in sight in many science fiction movies - nor AR/VR machinery. Not that any of that guessing is part of the topic of this discussion. I agree however that voice recognition (and especially Siri) are an unfulfilled promise at this time.
Westworld, Parks and Rec, Tera Nova, Star Trek, nearly all depict glass and metal devices with gesture and voice input.
I’ve read and participated in this discussion for quite some time. At this point, it is useless. More than half off us enjoy an iPad as our computer. Others can’t make it work yet, largely because they are stuck, for whatever reason beyond their control, using 37 year old technology.
But the iPad can, does and will replace the laptop the way electric cars and horses will be in use at the same time.
... stuck, for whatever reason beyond their control, using 37 year old technology. ...
Maybe.. that’s the case. For all my years of making the iPad my primary computing device and getting skepticism from those who oppose it.Stuck? No, by choice. A broad generalization based on your opinion, not facts.
Maybe.. that’s the case. For all my years of making the iPad my primary computing device and getting skepticism from those who oppose it.
Most of those who oppose it run into a certain task that they don’t care to find a workaround or a different method to successful complete it on iPadOS. I’ll say this… a vast majority can get by with using an iPad as their primary computing device, but they refuse to adjust to computing on iPadOS.
They make the error of applying their existing workflow without trying to work within the parameters of iPadOS. For instances…. I recall seeing someone in this thread discussing how there’s no way to change music metadata and it’s much easier on macOS. But later on found that their is an app in the AppStore to do such a thing.
“Oppose”? Did you read this thread? The iPad simply does not work for many applications.Maybe.. that’s the case. For all my years of making the iPad my primary computing device and getting skepticism from those who oppose it.
It’s not about “work arounds”, “getting by” or “adjustment“ to the iPadOS way of computing.I’ll say this… a vast majority can get by with using an iPad as their primary computing device, but they refuse to adjust to computing on iPadOS.
anectdotes. there are plenty. And again, “errors”?!They make the error of applying their existing workflow without trying to work within the parameters of iPadOS. For instances…. I recall seeing someone in this thread discussing how there’s no way to change music metadata and it’s much easier on macOS. But later on found that their is an app in the AppStore to do such a thing.
The thread is about discussing the iPad as a viable option as a laptop replacement and finding ways to complete certain task on the iPad.“Oppose”? Did you read this thread? The iPad simply does not work for many applications.
So, you are attacking my vocabulary without checking for grammar? What exactly do you mean by criticse myself? I'm confused... do you mean characterize myself?It’s not about “work arounds”, “getting by” or “adjustment“ to the iPadOS way of computing.
Your vocabulary seems to communicate a narrow-minded attitude - ironically, this is exactly what you criticise yourself.
I gave you a perfect example of what I mean by a situation to whom someone hit a roadblock and found a solution. And I agree with @sparkd, we all have our preferences. But you on the other hand... is the reason behind my post, you oppose the iPad as a laptop replacement.anectdotes. there are plenty. And again, “errors”?!
I like to believe that many people like to use an iPad… and discover that for whatever reason it doesn’t suffice.
It just happens. It has nothing to do with state of mind.
I meant what I wrote - your vocabulary gives the impression of a certain attitude… seemingly narrow-minded, something which you yourself seem to impute as attitude of people who find that the iPad can not solve all their computational problems.So, you are attacking my vocabulary without checking for grammar? What exactly do you mean by criticse myself? I'm confused... do you mean characterize myself?
Making assumptions about someone with little or no data does not usually lead to valid conclusions, doesn’t it? ?I gave you a perfect example of what I mean by a situation to whom someone hit a roadblock and found a solution. And I agree with @sparkd, we all have our preferences. But you on the other hand... is the reason behind my post, you oppose the iPad as a laptop replacement.
My goodness all I'm trying to indicate is that for some an iPad can serve as a laptop replacement, but you solely dismiss it.Sure, iPad is a hammer for various types of nails. And an excellent one thereby - but some things out there simply require a different tool.
Westworld, Parks and Rec, Tera Nova, Star Trek, nearly all depict glass and metal devices with gesture and voice input.
In all seriousness, keyboards are archaic as an input device.
16GB is not overkill for the high-end experiences that the likes of Adobe are bringing to iPad Pro with their pioneering next-generation Creative Cloud experiences on iPadOS. 64GB would be more than useful.
I meant what I wrote - your vocabulary gives the impression of a certain attitude… seemingly narrow-minded, something which you yourself seem to impute as attitude of people who find that the iPad can not solve all their computational problems.
Making assumptions about someone with little or no data does not usually lead to valid conclusions, doesn’t it? ?
Just for the protocol: since I registered on MR I use almost exclusively iPPs for my personal things… just not when it doesn’t solve or address the problem: wether it’s 3D-animation, 2D/3D visualisation, programming, desktop publishing, reliability of I/O, general management of physical media, &, seemingly arbitrary hardware restrictions, &, & - there are certain programs which I like to use or have to and they are not available on iPadOS. And no, there is no substitute in form of an app available. Or there simply isn’t an app.
That not really Microsoft problem but Intel problem.Surface Pro is mediocre in it's implementation of how its' used.
Touch points are too fine - Microsoft is STILL in the age of using a stylus / pen for selection. Don't believe what they say.
Battery life still doesn't compare.
you MUST have the surface dock to CHARGE IT!! silly.
you need a dock to extend or mirror it's screen onto another - well 7+ onward finally has USB-C. Heck I think iPad Pro beat Microsoft here.
For what you get you're better off buying an Asus Z13 Flow much better performance, 2y standard warranty globally, dedicated video card!
The last 4 corporations I've worked at offered the surface. in each roughly 300ppl tried it (died in the wolf desktop or laptop users - both corporate / home for windows OS). After 3-5mths nearly 80% chose to relinquish and go BACK to a laptop. 2-in-1's not even considered yet. Doesn't matter if these users pay for the lease (brand new in box except for imaging) or not - the majority return and cancel their lease.