Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
Isn't the web version much more basic than the software version?
It is. It’s almost as limited as the native app. It does have certain advantages over the native version, so it would be worth a try, but it still is not as capable as the Windows version.

And I would say that this is different from what Apple does with their software/ features, and I will explain. People are paying Microsoft to access Office on the iPad. With MS Office’s subscription cost for using it on the iPad, it really should have better features. Meanwhile, most of Apple’s apps are free, and the few that are subscription or paid for aren’t significantly worse on other platforms. Apple Music has an Android app which works fine. Heck, Apple’s iWork office software is free on Windows, and is either full-featured with the Mac version, or very close. I think people would be forgiving of some features missing from the iPad versions of Office compared to the Windows version, but what Microsoft has shipped here is so below par, especially considering you have to pay a subscription to use it… There’s really zero reason that customers paying just as much or possibly even more to access MS Office on their device should get such a badly hobbled version of it…

And many businesses required use of MS Office. None of Apple’s apps are really required by businesses. With an app that is so widely used and required in industry, MS should not be intentionally hobbling it so severely as they are. They should provide good enough support at least that it’s doable, even if a couple features remain limited to Windows. But I think Microsoft does this to maintain their grip on the industry, and ensure that companies use their software and their platform. It’s technically Microsoft’s prerogative to do this since it’s their software, but then I think they should at least charge less for it on other platforms.

Personally, I think the way they’ve intentionally hobbled MS Office on iPad is unacceptable given you have to pay the exact same amount of money to access it as is needed on Windows, which is ridiculous when you consider how different they are in feature-set. I hope Google Sheets and iWork continue to pull customers away from MS Office until they’re forced to provide more to customers…
 
Last edited:
Out of curiosity, have you explored Office on the web? I wonder if it would give you the same experience... but we have discussed this ad nauseam that Microsoft prefers you to use their software on Windows devices. It's no different from Apple gatekeeping some of their iOS exclusive features... Google is really the only company that has no platform allegiance.
To be honest, I’ve not tried it yet but I certainly will. I much prefer the desktop + ipad pro setup to desktop + laptop + some tablet with pen support.
Having LTE connectivity on ipad is also a major plus for me.
What is also a shame is the lack of true Office alternative appropriate for corporate usage.
Sadly Pages, Libre Office and others like these are no real alternative. Compatibility is just not there. It has to be 100% not 80 or 90 something.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.