swingerofbirch
macrumors 68040
I disagree.
Not enough offerings.
I'm waiting for the iPad Performa 5200.
Not enough offerings.
I'm waiting for the iPad Performa 5200.
The 10th gen means they’ve given up on the education market. All hail king Chromebook’s.
I really don't understand the regular iPad having landscape camera but not the Pro.
Apple needs to simplify its lineups. Having all these different models just to hit price points results in a confusing mess. What is the point of the iPad Air? The name has no meaning anymore. Who is it for, exactly?My guess is that the 10th gen iPad will eventually replace the 9th gen iPad. It just needs another year or two for costs to come down so Apple can reduce the price further. I don't know if Apple can ever lower it enough to reach that magical $329/299 threshold, but at present, the iPad costs more because it cost more to design and make, and that's simply the reality of hardware manufacturing.
But saying FaceID is for ‘pro’ models and TouchID/home button is for non-pro models seems arbitrary. Especially since non-pro iPhones have FaceID. What makes FaceID a pro feature?My pick of line-up would be:
iPad - in Mini / Regular / Large
iPad Pro - in Mini / Regular / Large
That way you get all three sizes (since I think size is the key differentiator), with the ability to upgrade to a Pro version of a size if you need the higher end configuration.
We could have ended up here quite easily if Apple kept a home button version of the Mini, Regular and 12 inch iPads in the range and then had the Pro line-up be the the FaceID range.
As things stand the minor spec differences are so numerous and arbitrary you have to really dig into the range to work out whether you are getting the best of something or not.
Although the worst thing is that Apple hasn't really delivered anything exciting to the iPad in years - my 2018 11 inch iPad Pro is really no different to the latest model.
What’s the point of the Air other than there’s too much of a price gap between the vanilla and pro models? Maybe Apple needs to stop caring about price gaps between non-pro and pro models and stop filling them with unnecessary products.Definitely need to cull the herd. mini at 329, Vanilla at 449, air at 599, pro 11" 799, pro 13" 999
Definitely need to cull the herd. mini at 329, Vanilla at 449, air at 599, pro 11" 799, pro 13" 999
My take:Apple needs to simplify its lineups. Having all these different models just to hit price points results in a confusing mess. What is the point of the iPad Air? The name has no meaning anymore. Who is it for, exactly?
Unfortunately as an iPad fan I'm used to the whole "well, we'll get that in a year" routine. At least we get the weather app this year.The Pro will get it when it has a more substantial redesign. These things are so expensive however you would expect to not have to wait around for minimum a year due to Apple not wanting to pony up the costs for changes to the assembly line
I miss when Apple had iPad, iPad Mini and iPad Pro. That was enough. If you really want to add in the Air do it but then don’t make it so close to the iPad Pro.
I thought I would order a new Pro to replace my 2017 10.5'' iPad Pro. Right now I'm leaning toward getting the battery of the old one replaced and revisit the options in a couple of years or once the 2017 doesn't get updates anymore.
I disagree.
Not enough offerings.
I'm waiting for the iPad Performa 5200.
I think next year you'll see minor spec bumps for the 11th gen. A15. Maybe Apple Pencil 2 support. It'll drop to $399 and the 9th gen goes away or is only sold on the eductation store.My guess is that the 10th gen iPad will eventually replace the 9th gen iPad. It just needs another year or two for costs to come down so Apple can reduce the price further. I don't know if Apple can ever lower it enough to reach that magical $329/299 threshold, but at present, the iPad costs more because it cost more to design and make, and that's simply the reality of hardware manufacturing.
I think you're right.
The iPad has always been advertised as 'thin and light' and therefore the Air branding has always felt redundant to me. It felt redundant in 2013, and it feels even more redundant now. The Air is still the lightest full-size iPad but the difference is so small you're grasping at straws really.
Fair enough the 1st gen iPad Air truly was significantly thinner and lighter than what came before, but that was just a natural development of the 9.7-inch iPad and didn't need to be rebranded 'Air'.
When the MacBook Air was introduced it made perfect sense as it genuinely was strikingly thin and it ushered in a new class of notebook computers. It booted out the optical drive and shocked the world with how it could fit in an envelope. iPad Air? Can't say the same. In fact I recall a slight giggle from the audience when Phil Shiller said it'd be called iPad Air.
Two weeks ago I had all but written off the bigger iPad. It was too bulky and just no where near as portable as the iPad mini. Once the latter gets a Retina Display and equal hardware across the board, why would anyone consider the bigger model?
The iPad Air changed my perspective on all of that. It really does modernize the big iPad. While I suspect there are still going to be a lot of users who prefer the smaller form factor of the iPad mini with Retina Display, I do feel like there are those users who will continue to appreciate all of the benefits that go along with having a larger display. Text is easier to read, particularly on desktop versions of websites. Photos and videos are larger and thus more engaging as well. In the past there was this complex matrix of tradeoffs that you had to make between iPad and iPad mini. This generation, Apple does away with all of that.
I think people forget how big and heavy the iPad 3 and 4 were. 1.5 pounds crammed into a 9.7" chassis was very noticeable. Also remember that Apple kept the iPad 2 around as the cheaper model until 2014, only doing a brief run of fourth gens for like six months before the Air 2 came out and the Air took the $399 spot.
I think people forget how big and heavy the iPad 3 and 4 were. 1.5 pounds crammed into a 9.7" chassis was very noticeable. Also remember that Apple kept the iPad 2 around as the cheaper model until 2014, only doing a brief run of fourth gens for like six months before the Air 2 came out and the Air took the $399 spot.
Sorry but your explanation for the Air is weak. It’s in the lineup to fill a price gap. If it’s a good —> better —> best strategy then having two models at the low end plus a smaller size that’s more expensive than either model at the low end is confusing.My take:
The entry iPad for people looking to handle a few specific needs (eg: video consumption, web surfing, email etc).
The new 10th gen iPad - still aimed at education. I feel that the reason for maintaining Apple Pencil 1 support is primarily cost. The 2nd gen Apple Pencil costs more than the 1st gen (making it less accessible for schools / students). Baking in support for wireless charging would have further increased the cost, as well as making it impossible for the welcome to be shifted to landscape mode (focus is probably on video calls).
The Air is for people wanting an iPad that can handle any future use case, and don't need the bells and whistles that the pro models have. It has the same M1 chip, and uses the same accessories as the Pro. So anything the Pro can do, the Air can as well. Just maybe not as "nice".
If my 2018 iPad Pro had given way any time from this April to yesterday, I would probably have purchased the Air as a replacement, not the 2021 iPad Pro.
The Pro is for creatives and "pros" with demanding workflows which might benefit from the larger screen, LIDAR, promotion etc. Or just for people who want the best iPad experience money can buy.
I agree that "Air" doesn't mean the same thing it did anymore, but I think it still has a place in the current iPad lineup.
It exists to fill a price gap. The 9th gen iPad is $329 (which Apple kept around so they could sell an iPad for under $400) and the 11” iPad Pro is $799. That‘s a $470 difference. I think Apple should only have iPad and iPad Pro but that is a huge price gap. Of course if the Pros are priced fairly then it is what it is and who cares.I agree that Apple only needs 3 categories of iPads:
- iPad Pro (2 sizes)
- iPad regular (2 sizes if needed)
- iPad mini (1 size)
That's it! What purpose does the iPad Air serve at this point? We now not only have iPad Air, but we also have iPad 10th generation and iPad 9th generation of which all are currently being sold by the Apple Store as current lineups? WTH is that?
The new iPad lineup is a confusing, hot mess.
There is so much overlap and so many weird compromises, trying to figure out which iPad is best for whom is now an exercise in real frustration.
I'm a keen iPad user, and have been for a long time. I use them professionally and in my personal life (in accompaniment to Macs) and want to see the line up thrive.
But seriously, Tim, keep it simple.
WTF...