Where?The battery sucks on the pixel 4! All the reviewers are getting horrible battery life!
Where?The battery sucks on the pixel 4! All the reviewers are getting horrible battery life!
In the past, yes, most OEMs didn’t know what they’re doing and only added bloat vs stock Android.I don’t think many people agree with the claim OEMs do a better job with Android than Google does
I wouldn't switch if I was you. There isn't anything compelling enough for me to do it. Smartwatch integration is beyond poor to pretty much abandoned, apps are not as nicely done, accessories are poor, battery life will be average to poor once again like the last 3 generations, and constant battery drains. Also the carriers don't allow dual sim like they do for the iPhone. Unless you on Google Fi that ESIM is kinda useless.
I started on Android before i switched to apple and I think I'm going to stay with apple from here on out as the customization of android is nice but gets old after a while. I don't want to have to tinker with my device all the time. Android will never have the synergy of software and hardware because of the diverse nature of manufacturers.
If google had something like iMessage that worked on every phone I would strongly consider coming back to android. As of right now they can't even get RCS through the log jam of carriers across the world. IMO they need to stop asking the carriers for help and just start doing things how they want to do it.
Google needs to make a choice on if they are really in the hardware / device game or just an software / advertisement company. That choice needs to dictate how they do things. These half hearted attempts to make a phone show IMO a lack of focus. That lack of focus translates to that ever growing Google graveyard of products.
And yet here some people are buying a Pixel for the Android software experience it gives them?Pixel 4 is a poor representation of Android quality at the moment. Too expensive and not close to good enough hardware or software. Very gimmicky.
I would stick with iPhone.
The Pixel offers a great user experience. The air gestures might be a little gimmicky (at the moment at least) but the phone certainly isn't.Pixel 4 is a poor representation of Android quality at the moment. Too expensive and not close to good enough hardware or software. Very gimmicky.
I would stick with iPhone.
I disagree.....Pixel 4 is a poor representation of Android quality at the moment. Too expensive and not close to good enough hardware or software. Very gimmicky.
I would stick with iPhone.
The iPhone with the same build quality costs $699.I disagree.....
I think the pure stock Android on the Pixel 4 offers a great overall user experience.
Might be expensive...but then iPhones are overpriced if we are comparing hardware.
Hmmm so let's compare my iPhone Pro Max to say a Note 10+?The iPhone with the same build quality costs $699.
Still not explaining your reasoning why the Pixel 4 has poor hardware and software. And why the phone is gimmicky?The iPhone with the same build quality costs $699.
The way Google pitched radar is a gimmick. The quieting of the alarm when you wave at it is great but most of the gestures aren't any good and don't work well.Still not explaining your reasoning why the Pixel 4 has poor hardware and software. And why the phone is gimmicky?
It has a feature that currently is a bit gimmicky. That doesn't mean the phone is 'very gimmicky' as you say. Big difference between the two.The way Google pitched radar is a gimmick. The quieting of the alarm when you wave at it is great but most of the gestures aren't any good and don't work well.
The build quality and materials are middling for an $800 device and the battery is a huge problem for the price tag.
Counterpoints:It has a feature that currently is a bit gimmicky. That doesn't mean the phone is 'very gimmicky' as you say. Big difference between the two.
Absolutely nothing wrong with the build quality at all. It's a very solid device and feels good to use.
So really all you have is the battery being a problem on the 4. For the majority of people it's good enough on the 4XL.
The Pixel 3 was an amazing device in your opinion, yet it had a really atrocious battery, lmao.Counterpoints:
One of the two marketable changes from the Pixel 3, an amazing device, is a gimmick
"Nothing wrong with the build quality" kind of proves my point
What good is a phone without a battery?
You're still talking rubbish. One feature does not dictate the phone as a whole.Counterpoints:
One of the two marketable changes from the Pixel 3, an amazing device, is a gimmick
"Nothing wrong with the build quality" kind of proves my point
What good is a phone without a battery?
Funny to watch someone jump ship like this. You once used to make the same counterpoints to people that made the same arguments you are making now....Counterpoints:
One of the two marketable changes from the Pixel 3, an amazing device, is a gimmick
"Nothing wrong with the build quality" kind of proves my point
What good is a phone without a battery?
Pixel 2 and Pixel 3 were amazing devices. Pixel 4 is less than iterative.Funny to watch someone jump ship like this. You once used to make the same counterpoints to people that made the same arguments you are making now....
My Pixel 4 XL battery gets me through the day just fine. It's not as great as my 11 pro max or Note 10+ mind you but it gets me through the day.
The build quality is just the same as my other phones the 11 pro max and note 10+
LOL...then the iPhone 11 is not iterative?Pixel 2 and Pixel 3 were amazing devices. Pixel 4 is less than iterative.
Pixel 4 is a poor representation of Android quality at the moment. Too expensive and not close to good enough hardware or software. Very gimmicky.
iPhone 11 Pro is certainly iterative. Like I said, Pixel 4 is less than iterative.LOL...then the iPhone 11 is not iterative?
Then we are all waiting to for you to explain more on this...