This is a good take.people somehow associate smartphone CPU like how it works on desktop/laptops.
it doesn't correlate 100% where desktop CPU draws massive amount of watts, and second only to GPU.
theres not much to improve when it comes to SOC ... really
most of the battery drain is always attributed to either screen, and your 5g modem.
and theres no good solution for those.
if your OLED screen is still pulling massive amounts of battery, you won't see any gains even if they reduce it down to 1nm
Where has that ever been remotely implied. Apple sets the same measuring parameters for both.Someone said those numbers applied to the 14 Pro series are very "best case scenario" whereas on the 15 Pro it's probably going to be average/better than. Obviously there's no way of telling but I think the 15 Pro series battery life will be back to 13 PM levels (which were pretty good)
Where has that ever been remotely implied. Apple sets the same measuring parameters for both.
Most people have experienced worse battery performance with the 14 Pro Max compared to 13 Pro Max and battery health has been terrible.
Consider yourself lucky. I regretted letting go of my 13 Pro Max when getting the 14 Pro Max. Battery life is horrible and let's not talk about the fastest battery degradation in the history of iPhone since iPhone 6 Plus. 13 Pro Max was amazing battery-wise, and the only reason I am going 15 Pro Max actually is that I hope the battery will last as much as the 13 Pro Max.
Launch day 13PM better battery over launch day 14PM. Battery life has been less on the 14PM and don’t tell battery life at 88% is ok versus 98% 1 year later on the 13PM. I’m hoping for great battery again on the 15PM.
If it were the case they would have mentioned it , we both know apple like to suck themselves hard with every progress and improvementI think this type of story is why there is an assumption that there would be major energy savings. I thought we might see a 20% increase in battery.
![]()
iPhone 15 Pro's A17 Bionic Chip Could Be 35% More Energy Efficient, Enabling Longer Battery Life
The A17 Bionic chip for next year's high-end models of the iPhone 15 lineup could be 35% more efficient compared to current iPhone processors...www.macrumors.com
That is absolutely not true, the figures of n5>n3 are much differentUnfortunately, those articles are completely wrong because TSMC compares N3 with N5 v1.0, which was used in A14. The A15 and A16 already got the low hanging fruit.
And when they talk about 35%, it's the absolute best case scenario before TSMC revised down their numbers. In reality, the benefit of N3 over N4 is more like 10% power efficiency or 10% performance with 5% higher density.
We've no clue on battery sizeThey have higher capacity batteries
So it’s actually
Bigger battery + more efficient processor = same battery life
Makes no sense
We do not know of they indeed have larger batteries. That has been a RUMOR!They have higher capacity batteries
So it’s actually
Bigger battery + more efficient processor = same battery life
Makes no sense
But A15 and A16 never used TSMC N5.Thay
That is absolutely not true, the figures of n5>n3 are much different
"Compared to its 5-nm node, which TSMC launched in 2020, the mega-fab claims that its N3 process offers 60% to 70% higher logic density and 15% higher performance while consuming 30% to 35% less power"
Indeed!But A15 and A16 never used TSMC N5.
They used N5E (or N5P?) and N4!
So the „jump“ to N3B on A17 is much smaller that stated in that marketing note.
Probably due to a lot of iPhone users being out of shape.According to the CPU and GPU shrink to 3nm, fantastic battery times would be expected. 3nm needs a way less energy than 5nm. Why is the endurance of the new 15 pro only as good as the 14 pro. It should be a way better??????
We do not know of they indeed have larger batteries. That has been a RUMOR!
Maybe they‘re using the same batteries as the 14 series. Wait for some teardowns.
I have usually 60% to 80% of battery left when I go to bed. No need for a power bank anymore. Something not OK with your 14PM battery I assume.Consider yourself lucky. I regretted letting go of my 13 Pro Max when getting the 14 Pro Max. Battery life is horrible and let's not talk about the fastest battery degradation in the history of iPhone since iPhone 6 Plus. 13 Pro Max was amazing battery-wise, and the only reason I am going 15 Pro Max actually is that I hope the battery will last as much as the 13 Pro Max.
That is absolutely not true, the figures of n5>n3 are much different
"Compared to its 5-nm node, which TSMC launched in 2020, the mega-fab claims that its N3 process offers 60% to 70% higher logic density and 15% higher performance while consuming 30% to 35% less power"
My thoughts as well. We'll see what it isPerhaps Apple decided that the lightness of Titanium was a great selling feature.
With the N3 they reduce power consumption, so they decide to also reduce the battery capacity to reduce weight further (bringing its runtime similar to 14PM).
We'll find out when the teardowns happen.
Thay
That is absolutely not true, the figures of n5>n3 are much different
"Compared to its 5-nm node, which TSMC launched in 2020, the mega-fab claims that its N3 process offers 60% to 70% higher logic density and 15% higher performance while consuming 30% to 35% less power"
View attachment 2260793
This got posted today (https://istyle.ae/blog/how-much-battery-does-the-iphone-15-and-iphone-15-pro-have#:~:text=iPhone 15 Pro: Battery capacity,95 hours of audio playback.), hopefully it's true.
The 13 Pro Max had 4352 mAh.
N5 1.0 is the one used in ...the iphone 12 right ?You should read some actual analyses rather than something that regurgitates a press release.
![]()
TSMC’s 3nm Conundrum, Does It Even Make Sense? – N3 & N3E Process Technology & Cost Detailed
Shrinking finally costs more, Moore’s Law is now dead in economic termsA couple of weeks ago, we were able to attend IEDM, where TSMC presented many details about their N3B and N3E, 3nm class…www.semianalysis.com