Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Pinkyyy 💜🍎

macrumors 6502
Mar 25, 2023
400
1,307
Egypt
What I want to know is when will Apple bump up base model M3 beyond 8GB RAM & 256GB SSD?

For the money being paid it should be 16GB & 512GB
Well, since they finally upgraded the RAM to 8GB on the iPhone 15 Pros, they should be upgrading the base RAM on the MacBooks to 16GB at least. I can’t tell if they will do that with the M3 or with later generations though.
 

HobeSoundDarryl

macrumors G5
This trend of giving, comparatively, less and less upgrades to the non-Pros has only accelerated ever since Apple split up the iPhone line-up in 2017 with iPhone X and iPhones 8.

I really don’t know why anyone is still surprised by this?

Do you expect Apple to willingly see growth stagnate or decrease?

They make these products with profits as their first priority. Everything else is secondary.
Consumers are supposed to want maximum value for their money… not maximum profit for a seller. This implies more profit for Apple presumably by cutting value for consumers. Makes perfect sense for buyers to feel unhappy with this. Shareholders and fans who put corp above fellow consumers will obviously feel very different.
 

docbop

macrumors regular
Sep 9, 2008
234
210
Los Angeles, CA


The A17 chip designed for the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus will be made using a fundamentally different manufacturing process to the A17 Pro in the iPhone 15 Pro to cut costs, according to a rumor that has now been clarified by a reliable source.

A17-Feature-Dark.jpg

A Weibo user who claims to be an integrated circuit expert with 25 years of experience working on Intel's Pentium processors was first to float the rumor in June. Now, the same source has clarified Apple's apparent plan for its standard iPhones' chip in 2024.

The iPhone 15 Pro's A17 Pro chip is fabricated using TSMC's N3B process, but Apple reportedly plans to switch to the lower-cost N3E process for next year's standard A17 chip designed for the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus. This will mark the first time that Apple has designed a chip specifically for its standard iPhone models. In previous years, Apple simply gave the entire iPhone lineup the same chip before staggering them by one year between the standard and the Pro models starting with 2022's iPhone 14.

The A15 Bionic chip in the iPhone 14 and ‌‌iPhone 14‌‌ Plus is a higher binned variant with one additional GPU core than the A15 used in the ‌iPhone 13‌ and ‌‌iPhone 13‌‌ mini, so some cross-generational differences despite outwardly featuring the same chip would not be unheard of, but this would effectively be the retention of the same name on a fundamentally different chip.

N3B is TSMC's original 3nm node created in partnership with Apple. N3E, on the other hand, is the simpler and cheaper node that most other TSMC clients will use. N3E has fewer EUV layers and lower transistor density than N3B, resulting in lower efficiency. N3B has also been ready for mass production for longer than N3E, but it has much lower yield. N3B was effectively designed as a trial node and is not compatible with TSMC's successor processes including N3P, N3X, and N3S, meaning that Apple has to redesign its future chips to take advantage of TSMC's innovations.

Apple was originally believed to be planning to use N3B for the A16 Bionic chip, but had to revert to N4 because it was not ready in time. It is likely the case that Apple is using the N3B CPU and GPU core design originally designed for the A16 Bionic in the A17 Pro, before switching to the original A17 designs with N3E later in 2024. This architecture will presumably be iterated on through TSMC's successor nodes for chips like the "A18" and "A19."

The Weibo user was first to say that the standard iPhone 14 models would retain the A15 Bionic chip, with the A16 being exclusive to the iPhone 14 Pro models – a rumor that went on to be widely corroborated and turned out true. Earlier this month, Haitong International Securities analyst Jeff Pu corroborated the rumor about 2024's A17 chip being fabricated with N3E, adding that the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus will also feature 8GB of memory, up from 6GB on the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus.

Article Link: iPhone 16 to Feature First A-Series Chip Designed Specifically for Standard Models
One of the Apple fanboy websites that runs endless benchmarks was testing the new iPhone 15 and stressing it the chip ran hotter than the same test on a iPhone 14. Thought part of attraction of 3nm was it was to run cooler.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎

aloyouis

macrumors regular
May 30, 2011
113
129
Remember the days when all Apple users cared about was the the user experience of the software and the design? Since the switch to Intel, I feel like we've become obsessed with feeds and speeds even more. Yeah, I remember when Steve Jobs use to talk the new G4 and G3, but it was kinda of an afterthought.
Holy ****! I think you're an old copier guy.
 

hans1972

macrumors 68040
Apr 5, 2010
3,396
3,007
And blindly defending Apple regardless of their penny pinching ways isn't a new concept either.

Those of us who supports a free market will always defend any company trying to make higher profits (exception being products needed to support life).

Also we would support any customers only buying stuff which provides enough value to justify the price they have to pay.
 

Mainyehc

macrumors 6502a
Mar 14, 2004
864
419
Lisbon, Portugal
THEY'RE BINNED PROCESSORS, HAROLD

(Now, in all seriousness, I'm not sure they are, but I bet they are, and we shall see once that iFixit partner has a go at it and x-rays one of those…)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎

Allen_Wentz

macrumors 68030
Dec 3, 2016
2,778
3,046
USA
Yay, more artificial crapping on the standard models to upsell!
Longing for the days of "This is iPhone"
That comment "more artificial crapping on the standard models to upsell!" makes no sense to me. Please explain. Do you expect Apple not to have a range of different phones?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Chidoro and mech986

Allen_Wentz

macrumors 68030
Dec 3, 2016
2,778
3,046
USA
They know the sales of the 15/15Pro this year will be down. They are running ads in record numbers to try and sell what is having a lackluster start. This year the variants, call it iPhone 14S or iPhone 14 Lite (weighs less) and Pro Maxis simply not the 15 that was expected.
Oh darn. It appears that Pro Max sales are up, not lackluster. That should please Apple. Less lower end sales and more upper end sales is a good thing. We do need to see overall total numbers but we may not.
 
  • Love
Reactions: mech986

Mac_The_Ripper

Suspended
Sep 12, 2023
275
669
🇺🇸
Those of us who supports a free market will always defend any company trying to make higher profits (exception being products needed to support life).

Also we would support any customers only buying stuff which provides enough value to justify the price they have to pay.
I support a free market, but I will never defend blatant corporate greed. That is the difference.
 

Mac_The_Ripper

Suspended
Sep 12, 2023
275
669
🇺🇸
The process that the A17 Pro is on is a dead end. “Cut costs” in this case is technology illiteracy by the reporters. The current 3nm process is dead, it’s not going to be scaled up by TSMC. The process node that IS going to be how they do 3nm going forward will be cheaper BECAUSE ITS SCALING UP TO BE USED BY EVERYONE.

This isn’t blindly defending Apple, it’s understanding the basics of the chip manufacturing industry.
It's blindly defending Apple. It is difficult to see when you are blind. I can assure my understanding is well beyond the "basics" in terms of the chip manufacturing industry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: antonrg

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
14,756
21,449
It's blindly defending Apple. It is difficult to see when you are blind. I can assure my understanding is well beyond the "basics" in terms of the chip manufacturing industry.
So you what’s your take on A17 regular likely being produced on N3E instead of N3B? Do you think it makes sense for them to spend more money on a dead end node process?
 

Apple.Fanatic

macrumors member
Oct 27, 2015
99
154
Atlanta, Georgia
Respect for those who got the 15, but I’m so glad I decided to hold off.

Yup. I'll be waiting for the iPhone 16 Pro for my next iPhone purchase. This year was basically titanium and USB-C (which was a forced "innovation" due to EU laws). Not enough to justify it as a buy for me...maybe if you really need 5x zoom and like the larger Pro Max but the larger iPhone is not for me. Maybe next year the normal Pro model will get 5x zoom and I pray Apple releases at least one cool feature to warrant paying 1K+ to upgrade my iPhone 13 Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎

EntropyQ3

macrumors 6502a
Mar 20, 2009
709
796
Cost efficiency is only a benefit but differentiation across iPhones is not a bad thing. Standard model users do not need Pro/gaming processes and other features.
The main problem is with differentiation by crippling. Withholding a desireable feature from the baseline model, and then overcharging brutally for it on the device you actually want to sell (and buy) is borderline acceptable. But to outright cripple models, such as blocking ProRes functionality from the regular iPhones, disallowing user upgradeability of socketed flash memory, et cetera leaves a decidedly sour taste in any consumers mouth, and particularly so from a ”premium brand”.

The bean counters at Apple don’t really appreciate this. For instance, it’s easy to calculate the money Apple gains by shipping base macs with almost no RAM or SSD space and then sell the memory at 500-1000% mark-up. It’s not so easy to determine how many potential sales Apple looses when customers decide not to buy when they realize the actual cost, or how many would have upgraded to more if the cost had been lower, thus giving Apple the same income and happier customers, or the ugly feeling left in the pit of a customers stomach when they know they’ve been shafted.

This is not good for a premium brand. Apple should sell good products at high prices, not hamstrung products at high prices.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎

Gudi

Suspended
May 3, 2013
4,590
3,265
Berlin, Berlin
... adding that the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus will also feature 8GB of memory, up from 6GB on the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus.
Why would one just add such an important information? The same amount of RAM in an iPhone, as in an iPad, as in an iMac. We truly live in the future, next year! 😜
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎

Sunsster1988

macrumors regular
Aug 7, 2019
149
150
Yup. I'll be waiting for the iPhone 16 Pro for my next iPhone purchase. This year was basically titanium and USB-C (which was a forced "innovation" due to EU laws). Not enough to justify it as a buy for me...maybe if you really need 5x zoom and like the larger Pro Max but the larger iPhone is not for me. Maybe next year the normal Pro model will get 5x zoom and I pray Apple releases at least one cool feature to warrant paying 1K+ to upgrade my iPhone 13 Pro.
There will be more buttons instead of reducing them.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.