Typical ceo can run the company once it’s already been established. Jobs did that.
This doesn't even make sense to me, "a
A typical CEO can run the company once it's already been established?" You do realize that Jobs appointed Tim Cook to conduct this company from where it was when he passed away? This is a billion company and you're making it sound like you have the general knowledge of what Cook conducts for business relations, working with a myriad of parts supplier negotiations and supply chain relations.
You are Severely undermining his responsibilities saying the word 'typical'. Which I don't think you and I or any others have a full understanding of what Tim Cook does to further this company beyond the success that they are today.
Regardless if Steve Jobs established this company, that doesn't mean that everybody has the insight to come in and conduct and organize a company of this magnitude. You keep using the word typical, but you never seem to define how that correlates to Steve Jobs or Tim Cook.
And the AirPods aren’t the first wireless Bluetooth ear set released by Apple..one was released similar in 2007.
Not an appropriate comparison at all, and Zero relevance to anything release in 2007 that the technology that's embedded into the AirPods with the W1 Chip that were released in 2016. Completely different product with and on entirely another level of popularity based on the simplicity and convenient factors battery life.
Basically, cook didn’t do anything spectacular. .
You were saying:
Under Cook, Apple stock has outperformed 81% of the S&P 500 in the past three years.
Under Cook, Apple's revenue is up 99% to $216B since 2011.
Under Cook, their Environment strategy has grown exponentially with green house distribution and environment protection, building solar plants.
https://www.aboveavalon.com/dailypr...evenue-estimates-apple-musics-productive-2016
https://www.aboveavalon.com/dailypr...ates-ipad-sales-estimates-mac-sales-estimates
http://www.businessinsider.com/appl...nce-then-and-now-stands-at-over-230-billion-2
Anyone who worked at Apple or is familiar with Apple knows they still follow the vision jobs set forth.
Of course, we know Steve Jobs still runs deep with his DNA within the company. But again, we're not comparing Tim Cook and Steve Jobs, Steve Jobs was a visionary and Tim Cook is a financial guru. Really two different people that don't need to be compared to each other in that sense.
And if Tim is still following the vision, then anyone stepping into the Role..doing the same...
This is just a self generated assertion that you have no proof knowing otherwise. You're basically making a claim knowingly that any CEO can come in and take over what he has done and perform his duties and executed the things he has over the course of five years. That doesn't make your statement any more accurate than it is nothing more than a generalization.