Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,889
5,843
Central Tx
So I’ve tested the new Halide update (process zero) on the moon with the 5x & surprisingly it did very well. There is none of the water color look when editing. I DID have to manually set the iso to 200 and use a 1/1000 second shutter speed & I had to Focus Manually using the loupe and 2.5x readers to achieve sharp focus. I also tested the 1x camera around the house with ambient light, setting iso to 100 or 200 and adjusting shutter speed & manually focusing. It does look good, you just have to get your camera settings adjusted first. The final result shows a good bit of detail and craters. Here is the moon. The crop is 500% zoomed in. Edited in Lightroom mobile

—If you use the Reeflex app in Raw, you will get the same results as Halide. Samples look very similar.—


IMG_6630.jpeg


A lesser crop

IMG_6633.jpeg




IMG_6632.jpeg
 
Last edited:

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,889
5,843
Central Tx
A couple of halide samples: raw, 15 pro max

Thunder storm 1x camera

IMG_6651.jpeg


Keys: 1x camera, edited & screenshot of the raw file. Lightroom edits

So far I like what the new feature of Halide does, but I prefer ProRAW and 48mp files. I will use Halide with the 5x camera more often or as needed though. Hopefully the developers will make a way for raw files for the 48mp format soon.

IMG_6659.jpeg


IMG_6661.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: shadowboi

shadowboi

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Feb 16, 2024
606
1,067
Unknown
A couple of halide samples: raw, 15 pro max

Thunder storm 1x camera

View attachment 2407090

Keys: 1x camera, edited & screenshot of the raw file. Lightroom edits

So far I like what the new feature of Halide does, but I prefer ProRAW and 48mp files. I will use Halide with the 5x camera more often or as needed though. Hopefully the developers will make a way for raw files for the 48mp format soon.

View attachment 2407089

View attachment 2407091

I can only imagine having jpegs like the 1st and 3rd photos. I
can remember my iPhone 5 shoot like that. Here is an example I took back in 2013:
iPhone 5 (11).JPG


And another one:
iPhone 5 (23).JPG


No computational craps, no denoises, pure image. And no bothering fixing exposure and shadows in LR.

Now I have to exclusively use LR to shoot RAW with my SE.
I was thinking of getting regular 15 but looks like it is not so easy with RAW here. Since the sensor is quad Bayer it could be some hardware-coded limitation of it being unable to shoot true RAW. Maybe Apple can remove the hardcoding but I doubt it will happen at all.

One quite magical thing my old 5 had that neither of new iPhones do is 33mm equivalent lens. Modern are too wide (26mm in 15 and 24mm in Pro/PM). So to achieve my preferred "almost 35mm" distance I gotta crop and lose resolution
 

LockOn2B

Cancelled
Jan 25, 2023
266
497
Since the sensor is quad Bayer it could be some hardware-coded limitation of it being unable to shoot true RAW. Maybe Apple can remove the hardcoding but I doubt it will happen at all.
It’s more like, Quad Bayer sensors usually shuffle quad pixels around to regular Bayer in full-res mode, which is what’s fed to the ISP. So yeah, it’s really up to Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shadowboi
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.