Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I saw that. Its Way too difficult to determine what that means. My thoughts are with the iPhone XR being released, Apple is clearly emphasizing this phone to be there entry-level phone with Face ID. Even if the iPhone SE was updated, there’s no way they’re going to go back to that form factor with touch ID or 3.5 Jack anymore. To me, just the fact that they discontinued the SE and didn’t replace it with anything is kind of a telling sign.

Agreed. I don’t think they’re stupid about these decisions either. They obviously know the market and which models currently sell and where the demand is right.
 
LOL! Another conspiracy theory.

Apple like money and if enough were buying to make it worth it, they would make the phone. That is my proof, it is better than yours

The SE sold relatively well and it was making a profit. Had very little R&D required. What is known is that it had a smaller profit margin, that's why its gone.
[doublepost=1536923633][/doublepost]
Agreed. I don’t think they’re stupid about these decisions either. They obviously know the market and which models currently sell and where the demand is right.

No they know that people will buy 'what is good enough' and what will make them more money through higher profit margins. People who would buy a 4 inch phone will make a compromise and buy a bigger phone.


I saw that. Its Way too difficult to determine what that means. My thoughts are with the iPhone XR being released, Apple is clearly emphasizing this phone to be there entry-level phone with Face ID. Even if the iPhone SE was updated, there’s no way they’re going to go back to that form factor with touch ID or 3.5 Jack anymore. To me, just the fact that they discontinued the SE and didn’t replace it with anything is kind of a telling sign.

Someone brought up a point that waiting till March next year would mean that lots of people buy the new models with high profit margins (especially across the holiday period) and then in March after its died down they release an update. I'm not sure how likely it is but It makes sense to me.
[doublepost=1536923711][/doublepost]
I’m pretty sure the margins on the se were much higher than the iPhone 7.

iPhone design and most of the components were from 2012 vs 2016.

I agree with the other posters regarding demand.

if Apple were deprecating products just for the sake of it, don’t believe they would still offer the iPod Touch.

It is fairly well known that the popularity of the SE is thought to have brought down Apple's average margin per iPhone in 2016. The SE's margins were low because it was sold so cheaply.
 
The SE sold relatively well and it was making a profit. Had very little R&D required. What is known is that it had a smaller profit margin, that's why its gone.

It would have cost big bucks for Apple to engineer a new circuit board with up to date processor, memory, etc. Likely way more cost that what they thought they could recover.
 
Yes, Apple is “forcing” you to go bigger but there is zero evidence that it’s simply for the sake of larger screens, per se — since there is an Xs and an Xs Max, not just the smaller Xs — and not because there isn’t sufficient demand for smaller phones.

Its for the sake of being able to charge more.
 
The SE sold relatively well and it was making a profit. Had very little R&D required. What is known is that it had a smaller profit margin, that's why its gone.
Smaller profit margin than what? It had the same margin as the 7, for example. 59% vs. 64% for the 8, I think.
[doublepost=1536923860][/doublepost]
Its for the sake of being able to charge more.
Then why don’t they only offer Plus or Max sizes now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FFR
It would have cost big bucks for Apple to engineer a new circuit board with up to date processor, memory, etc. Likely way more cost that what they thought they could recover.

The more likely scenario is that they know SE users will just move onto 'good enough' larger iPhones that have a bigger profit margin.
 
The more likely scenario is that they know SE users will just move onto 'good enough' larger iPhones that have a bigger profit margin.

It is just like the Mini, sooner or later Apple has to stop production of old and move on.

I remember when Apple first rumored a larger phone, you would have thought the world was ending for some and yet larger is now THE most demanded
 
  • Like
Reactions: EM2013
Then why don’t they only offer Plus or Max sizes now?

Because it's a matter of gradually moving people to the higher margin phones.

Smaller profit margin than what? It had the same margin as the 7, for example. 59% vs. 64% for the 8, I think.

The SE definitely had a lower profit margin than the 6S and 7.
[doublepost=1536924465][/doublepost]
It is just like the Mini, sooner or later Apple has to stop production of old and move on.

I remember when Apple first rumored a larger phone, you would have thought the world was ending for some and yet larger is now THE most demanded

What has the Mini got to do with anything? Besides another example of Apple not updating something to the point that it isn't popular because people don't want to buy 3 year old tech at premium prices. (Well the Mini 4 is more like 4 year old tech at this point).

Nobody is denying that there isn't demand for the large phones. But there is also demand for smaller phones, in that if Apple were actually to build a proper range, they would sell.
 
It is just like the Mini, sooner or later Apple has to stop production of old and move on.

I remember when Apple first rumored a larger phone, you would have thought the world was ending for some and yet larger is now THE most demanded
3.5 inches is the perfect screen size. No, wait, 4 inches is perfect. No, 5.7! Etc.
 
Agreed!

In the end it is money that makes these choices.

Yeah they know how to be lazy and instead of giving a choice to customers, they pull an early 2000s Microsoft and give 'whats good enough' and people buy it just because.
[doublepost=1536924579][/doublepost]
3.5 inches is the perfect screen size. No, wait, 4 inches is perfect. No, 5.7! Etc.

The perfect screen size is what works for particular people.
 
If there was all this demand, why would they lower the price?

Because it moved down in Apple's lineup.

It went from being fairly new specced, to being a year behind to being two years behind.

Computer prices have dropped in the last 25 years. Does that mean there was no demand for computers?

And of course demand dropped off in the end. The internals were 3 years old and the external design was 6 years old. How is a phone that is half 3 years old and half 6 years old meant to stay in high demand?

Apple didn't update it and thus demand fell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Le Big Mac
Because it moved down in Apple's lineup.

It went from being fairly new specced, to being a year behind to being two years behind.
That’s not how pricing works.

It went down, because demand went down, because it was old (and probably) because it was small.

If there was enough demand to keep it in production, there’d be enough demand to keep it at the same price.
 
That’s not how pricing works.

It went down, because demand went down, because it was old (and probably) because it was small.

If there was enough demand to keep it in production, there’d be enough demand to keep it at the same price.

That makes no sense in the context of this discussion.

Every iPhone has dropped in price as it has aged. Did you not notice the 7 and 8 drop in price this week?

Every time a new iPhone comes out, the previous one is slotted into the next position. The SE is a little weird because it stated as the low end phone but with specs better than the mid range phone.

If there was enough demand to keep it in production, there’d be enough demand to keep it at the same price.

Demand dropped because it wasn't updated. People don't tend to buy old tech at inflated prices at the same rate they buy new tech at inflated prices.
 
Because it moved down in Apple's lineup.

It went from being fairly new specced, to being a year behind to being two years behind.

Computer prices have dropped in the last 25 years. Does that mean there was no demand for computers?

And of course demand dropped off in the end. The internals were 3 years old and the external design was 6 years old. How is a phone that is half 3 years old and half 6 years old meant to stay in high demand?

Apple didn't update it and thus demand fell.
Well, you can’t have it both ways. If you want to claim that the profit margin went down because the price went down, then it needs to be updated to keep the price up. And if the price is up, so is the profit margin, so the profit margin is similar to the 7 and 8. Which means it wasn’t discontinued because the profit margin was too low. It’s because the demand was too low.
 
Well, you can’t have it both ways. If you want to claim that the profit margin went down because the price went down, then it needs to be updated to keep the price up. And if the price is up, so is the profit margin, so the profit margin is similar to the 7 and 8. Which means it wasn’t discontinued because the profit margin was too low. It’s because the demand was too low.

The SE didn't get updated as a line and got discontinued because a new model wouldn't have had the profit margin the new ones do.
 
The SE didn't get updated as a line and got discontinued because a new model wouldn't have had the profit margin the new ones do.
Why not? It had the same profit margin as the 8 and very similar to the 7 at the time they were all new.

If there were demand for the smaller screens, Apple would build them. The profit margins were there and there’s no reason to belief they still wouldn’t be... except the demand is gone.

And so am I.
 
Why not? It had the same profit margin as the 8 and very similar to the 7 at the time they were all new.

If there were demand for the smaller screens, Apple would build them. The profit margins were there and there’s no reason to belief they still wouldn’t be... except the demand is gone.

And so am I.

I really don't believe the SE had the same margin as the 8 had. Everything I've read says otherwise.

There is no proof that the demand is gone. Apple can simply make more from the bigger screened premium phones than it could for the SE.

Tell me the time when Apple offered a proper range of smaller phones alongside large phones? Oh thats right! Never.
 
I really don't believe the SE had the same margin as the 8 had. Everything I've read says otherwise.

There is no proof that the demand is gone. Apple can simply make more from the bigger screened premium phones than it could for the SE.

Tell me the time when Apple offered a proper range of smaller phones alongside large phones? Oh thats right! Never.
OK, one more. I posted links that are on the first page of this thread containing the cost and price and profit margins of the phones. If you want to argue with 9to5mac and Fortune, have at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FFR
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.