Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Have you run into space issues with 512GB?

  • Yes

    Votes: 56 41.8%
  • No

    Votes: 78 58.2%

  • Total voters
    134

Choco Taco

Suspended
Nov 23, 2022
615
1,065
My apps almost take up 500 GB, so no, it's not enough. It is entirely based on your personal needs.
 

RokinAmerica

macrumors regular
Jul 18, 2022
206
385
I can only comment from a desktop point of view, and windows at that. I have always used laptops until Covid, then we went completely remote for me. I build a desktop but my work, and more importantly, the proprietary software we used, required me to have a lot of disk space, both for backup and to have redundancy because I could not have downtime.

I now have a 1TB NVMe, a 1 TB SSD, a 2 TB SSD and a 2 TB HDD inside and a 1 TB external HDD and 500 GB external SSD. I had run into issues on my boot drive as that is where I keep my most used programs and certain data. I keep all other data on the 1 TB SSD and back that all up to the 2TB SSD. And back all that up to my NAS.

And then at the beginning of last year we changed software vendors and it all became cloud based. I now use 206GB on my 1TB NVMe, less than 200GB on my 1TB data SSD drive so while I answered yes, I no longer need all the extra storage I have.

TL:DR, as has been said, it really is only something you could really know if you are comfortable with.

And yes, Apple rips you off on ssd and ram prices.
 

Jumpthesnark

macrumors 65816
Apr 24, 2022
1,242
5,146
California
I have two MBP's, one personal and one for work. Both have 1TB. I don't have storage issues in either, for different reasons. Both are used primarily for photography.

On my personal MBP, I download, edit, post-process and offload image files. So quite often I have many many GBs of data that is temporarily kept on the MBP while working on a take, before I move that data to hard drives.

On my work MBP I am mostly connecting to my employer's DAM system and doing my work with files that are accessed on a browser and stored remotely. So I might be moving files around, but they're rarely files that are actually on my machine.

So in cases like mine, 1TB is plenty. I only "store" large amounts of data on one machine, and even then it's only temporary. 512MB would be enough for my work machine but not my personal machine.
 
Last edited:

SpotOnT

macrumors 65816
Dec 7, 2016
1,032
2,175
My apps take up more space than that. Plus you need to leave a chunk of the drive empty for RAM swap, SSD background work, etc.

I need 1TB minimum, even without putting a single personal file on there.
 

shenfrey

macrumors 68030
May 23, 2010
2,507
778
More than enough for some, depends on your usage. If you find you need more, theres always iCloud and external storage. You only need to the super fast speeds of SSD if you dealing with terabytes of files on a daily basis, otherwise you'll be more than fine with alternatives I mentioned.
 

matsan

macrumors regular
May 3, 2022
185
215
I'm a front/back-end software developer that moved from an 16" MBP i7 Intel 16/512 to an 16" MBP M1 Pro 32/512 and I am using 63% of disk space on the M1 whereas on the Intel I used 94%. Main change is the lack of support for Intel-based VMs on the M1, instead I moved these machines to an ESX-server. Parallels on the M1 only have a Debian-VM.

On the M1 I am running multiple Docker-based VMs, all arm-optimized; php, apache, mysql and localstack. Office, Illustrator, Photoshop, Xcode are the big disk space users.
 

astorre

Suspended
Nov 4, 2021
157
128
Have you found that you have gone over the 512GB mark with having 1TB?

yeap, around 600+ now, a few 4k movies and it fills up, but now I am glad that I have 1TB because I dont have to think about external storage, because I travel frequently so one less thing on my mind
 

matsan

macrumors regular
May 3, 2022
185
215
BTW - it's so easy to waste disk-space. Just found out that the Podcast app in Ventura 13.1 kept 4GB of downloaded podcasts. I never listen to music or podcasts on anything else than my iPhone but the default seems to be to sync across devices anyway.
 

Mr.Ben

macrumors newbie
Apr 17, 2022
23
25
I'm planning on getting a base model M2 Mac Mini with 256GB storage. I'll be upgrading to 16GB memory (+£200) so don't want to pay an extra £400 to upgrade to 1TB storage. Instead I'm going to get an external 1TB SSD which I can get somewhere around £70-£100. Hopefully that setup will work for me so I don't have to break the bank.

My 2012 iMac has 1TB storage - I'm at about 480GB. That's 9 years of design files, apps, photos, vids, music and documents. Running Monterey with only 8GB memory it's sometimes as slow as a tortoise... 😄
 
Last edited:

tygurr

macrumors member
Original poster
Oct 19, 2021
55
275
Wow, this has blown up. Have read through all your comments this morning and I thank you all for your input!

Seems a pretty split opinion and the best thing I can do is just see how I get on. I will see how I get on in those first couple of weeks (I know this isn't a long enough time frame to fully figure it out) and if I feel I need the upgrade shall return for the 1TB version and suck up the price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lioness~ and matsan

Lioness~

macrumors 68040
Apr 26, 2017
3,408
4,247
As a 2nd computer you will be fine with 512GB storage, is my opinion.
I’ve had an MBA as a 2nd computer for 4 years with 256GB, and sure I clean it up at times. Not using it for heavy stuff. With a desktop and iCloud it have worked totally without issues.
Though I would chose 512GB if I would replace it today. But I won’t, it still serves me well.
 

leslieg

macrumors member
Jun 22, 2020
96
128
I have 512GB and it's more than enough. you can also get an affordable external hard drive to move large files if you do end up running out of space
 
  • Like
Reactions: tygurr

zach-coleman

macrumors 65816
Apr 10, 2022
1,282
2,264
Seattle, Washington
I've had a 13" MBP M1 since early 2021. It was configured to 512GB. I only have 127GB remaining, and this is with me cleaning about once a month. This can be a problem, especially if you're a programmer. I occasionally make games, but they have tiny assets (current project is <200MB after over a year of work) if I made games with more advanced graphics I'd probably be much closer to being full already.

Next computer I get is gonna have at least 1TB, probably 2. At least I convinced myself to go with 512 over me trying to convince myself 256 would work out.
 

NewUsername

macrumors 6502a
Aug 20, 2019
590
1,323
Hi all, I have just preordered the new M2 MacBook Pro 14" and cannot wait for it to arrive! I went for the base model as quite frankly that is all I could afford, therefore it coming with just the 512GB of storage.

My main question is, is 512GB enough?

Now I know most will say "It depends on what you use it for", and while that is a valid argument, I just wanted to gauge whether people who have 512GB have run into any storage space issues?
It depends of a lot of things. For example, if you used to have a huge CD and DVD collection which you all ripped and now want to store locally, you’ll need hundreds of GB for that alone. However, if you rely on Spotify and Netflix for that, you need exactly 0 GB for that.

If you have a huge photo library which you want to keep locally, that can also be hundreds of GB. If you are fine with having them in iCloud, that will take very little space.

If you plan to run virtual machines and you want to keep them locally, that’s another huge amount of data.

If you do a lot of gaming on a Mac, don’t forget some games can take a lot of disk space.

However… don’t forget that extra internal storage is, in the end, just a matter of convenience, because you can also store stuff on an external SSD, which is a lot cheaper and it’s not tied to one specific computer.

For me personally, 256GB is too tight. 512GB is all right, but I do need to move some stuff to external storage (e.g. my music library). With 1TB, I could have almost everything on the internal drive. With 2TB, I wouldn’t need external storage at all.

Given the prices of internal storage at Apple, I went for 512GB and I think it’s fine.
 

centauratlas

macrumors 68000
Jan 29, 2003
1,893
3,970
Florida
When thinking of adequate storage, I often ask myself, “What would I grab on the way out if my house was on fire?”

This got me working on a project to move my external HDD backups to SSD late last year. I have cloud backups via iCloud, dropbox, and Evernote. Each serves a specific purpose. iCloud contains my most relevant/current files. Dropbox includes files I regularly share with others, and I use Evernote to scan/store my business/financial/legal documents. But even with that, I had a container of about 20+ HDDs some 20 years old and many many CDRs and DVDRs that have never been backed up.

Anyway to make a story short, between cloud storage and a pair of high capacity SSDs, I’m good. I still purchase my macs with 2TB standard but that is more for convenience and not necessity. If needed, I can work from a machine with 512GB or less.

Exactly. I do the same. I have photos from my grandparents, parents etc on it, plus old home movies from them. So I maxed out the 2019 MBP with 8TB. There is around 3 TB left. I have around 800 GB in Photos. There is a fair amount in iTunes both audio and video from old media. The rest is backups of my wife's 2021 MBP, work and stuff like that.

I just don't want to lose the old video and photos - so I back it up, but would want to be able to grab just one thing and not lose the stuff. (Yes, I do have several backups, but it is nice to have everything in one spot.) Hopefully it never comes down to "What would I grab on the way out if my house was on fire" though. :)

I keep them (usually) a long time. 7-8 years, perhaps using it for the kids if we replace it before that time period. So I'll probably have the 2019 MBP for another 3-4 years so I tend to max them out so that as tech progresses it doesn't fill up. E.g. ProRes or 4K video or 48MP raw etc on the iPhones vs .3 Mpx on the 1994 QuickTake or 1K or whatever on older iPhones.

So some questions for OP are:
1. How long will you keep it?
2. Do you shoot ProRes? Have a lot of photos or videos?
3. Do you have a large iTunes library of music, movies, tv shows etc?

:)
 

PsykX

macrumors 68030
Sep 16, 2006
2,745
3,922
If you just want to, say, install Xcode, you'll sell a 256GB Mac right away. This is what I have in my M1 iMac and I've lost so much time trying to install macOS on an external drive just to have Xcode. It works - but it sucks.

As for 512GB, I'd say it should be the bare minimum Apple provides. I believe it's suitable for most people.
If you have or produce a lot of media content however, you really should be looking for more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zach-coleman

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,366
10,123
Atlanta, GA
Hi all, I have just preordered the new M2 MacBook Pro 14" and cannot wait for it to arrive! I went for the base model as quite frankly that is all I could afford, therefore it coming with just the 512GB of storage.

My main question is, is 512GB enough?

Now I know most will say "It depends on what you use it for", and while that is a valid argument, I just wanted to gauge whether people who have 512GB have run into any storage space issues?
If you use the cloud and streaming, yes; if you use an external SSD, yes; if you store some stuff locally, yes; if you store a lot of stuff locally, no. It's probably worth your getting an external SSD for Time Machine backups anyway.

Like adult diapers, it depends, but I went with 1TB because I keep music stored locally.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: snak-atak

foobarbaz

macrumors 6502a
Nov 29, 2007
954
2,422
It seems to me like SSD sizes are stagnating. I had 512GB SSD in 2010. Sure the cloud has eased the need to local storage, but you'd think we'd be doubling storage every couple years.
What are you talking about? In 2010 the 512GB SSD was the top of the line costing $1400 ($1900 inflation-adjusted) extra in a MacBook Pro. Now it's literally the minimum in the base model.
 

MysticCow

macrumors 68000
May 27, 2013
1,564
1,760
It isn't enough! Send that MacBook Pro to me and I will--

(MacRumors mod looks my way)

I WILL NOT GO BACK TO THE NAUGHTY STOOL!!!!!!

(MacRumors mod gives a death glare)
 

BanjoDudeAhoy

macrumors 6502a
Aug 3, 2020
921
1,624
I’m one of those people who can easily get by with 256 GB. But I guess that’s because I use external drives and/or cloud storage for most of my stuff.
So, most of my devices only have on them what I absolutely need on the respective device.

If I had only one device and maybe a backup drive, I would probably go for 512 GB or 1 TB.
 

sdf

macrumors 6502a
Jan 29, 2004
924
1,295
My main question is, is 512GB enough?
It should be. And if it isn't, you can always offload things to the cloud or external storage. But I went 512GB on my Mac Studio last year and have plenty to spare so far.
 

DaveMBP

macrumors newbie
May 26, 2009
7
2
What are you talking about? In 2010 the 512GB SSD was the top of the line costing $1400 ($1900 inflation-adjusted) extra in a MacBook Pro. Now it's literally the minimum in the base model.
The base MBP in 2012 had 256GB. Now over 10 years later, the base is 512GB. That’s terrible progress IMO.

Same for RAM… we only just doubled 10 years later.

That’s what I’m talking about. It seems to me like progress has been slow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zach-coleman
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.