Maybe the solution would be to bifurcate the OS - adding the option to select "Simple" or "Advanced" at setup?
Maybe the solution would be to bifurcate the OS - adding the option to select "Simple" or "Advanced" at setup?
At which point someone who thinks they are good with iOS picks Advanced, realises they arent as good as they think and then cant find the option to turn it back to Simple!Maybe the solution would be to bifurcate the OS - adding the option to select "Simple" or "Advanced" at setup?
I don't think iOS is that much more complicated, but instead it's much less intuitive. Apple took away all the visual cues and we're left with much guesswork.
What visual clues are you discussing? I've been with iOS since iOS 5 and no version has been intuitive and iOS 6 was pinnacle of skeuomorphism gone wild.I don't think iOS is that much more complicated, but instead it's much less intuitive. Apple took away all the visual cues and we're left with much guesswork.
In a sense that's already there just by its nature--people who don't know about different things will use the phone as they know it in a "simple" way, while those who do know about additional features and settings will use those as they see fit in an "advanced" manner. The point is that it's all usable either way.Maybe the solution would be to bifurcate the OS - adding the option to select "Simple" or "Advanced" at setup?
I think iOS is doing just fine, besides the bugs.
And no, 3D Touch won't make sense for everyone, but then a lot of people still don't do FaceTime and other things with their devices.
Was it terrible of me to actually laugh at that?The first iPhone had to be simple because it needed to appeal to boomers, who are tech idiots. Now that we're finally managing to stuff their drooling selves into nursing homes, tech can advance more quickly.
A huge percentage of our friends/family/associates use iPhones and/or have an iPad. We make heavy use of FaceTime, iMessage and iCloud photo sharing without having to install third party apps to do what is built into iOS.Considering two-thirds of my family/friends/peers don't use iOS devices, we have found alternatives to Facetime.
and other things too
Personally I might like the concept however I feel I would seriously dislike the solution.I would love that.
A huge percentage of our friends/family/associates use iPhones and/or have an iPad. We make heavy use of FaceTime, iMessage and iCloud photo sharing without having to install third party apps to do what is built into iOS.
What visual clues are you discussing? I've been with iOS since iOS 5 and no version has been intuitive and iOS 6 was pinnacle of skeuomorphism gone wild.
Because not all devices can access proactive features + the pull down search is great if you're not on your first page. I'd rather they move the whole thing to the pull down search.
One school is iOS is too complex, the other school iOS needs to be more like android. What is Apple to do?
Really? If you look to the future (i.e, luxury cars), you'll find that modern vehicles have become more simple to use. Take the 2016 G01 BMW 7-series. When I compare its infotainment system, iDrive, to the system in my BMW, a 2004 330ci, which has a MK4 navigation computer, the iDrive is a far more simple and robust system. You'll have to pry my 6-speed stick from my cold, dead hands though...
Well, the only other person I know who bought a 6s didn't have a clue what 3D Touch was until I showed it to her. I love it and I will play with it and explore the OS with it. I'm not complaining because its wasting my time or I'm confused by it.
I'm just commenting on the fact that I think the majority of people wont notice it or play with it unless there is some even tiny amount of encouragement from the UI or if its essential for performing a certain function.
In its current implementation I just know 12 months down the line people are going to tell me that 3D Touch is 'pointless', because they never use it. If Apple can find a way of encouraging people to us it it will take off.
What frustrates me is that I can see this coming. Maybe I'm wrong, I hope I am.
That is what "concerns" me most. I have yet to find a decent use for 3D Touch however I do see the potential it has. What is missing is something telling me that this app/function has a 3D Touch usable feature. By the time something I find routinely useful rolls out, 3D Touch will have been back-burnered like a lot of the gestures.
OSOM
It is frustrating that most of the 3D Touch features are 'hidden'. It seems to take someone messing around to stumble upon a new way of using it.
What's so hard about figuring out 3D Touch?
3D Touch the app icon. If it does something then it will inside the app as well. If the haptic just double taps you, then the app doesn't support it inside or out. Reading update notes for apps would also tell you if you can use it or not as well.
Are people too busy to explore and figure things out on their own now? Does everything need to be told to you?