Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Anti-Lucifer

macrumors 6502a
Mar 9, 2012
776
2
I did a clean install, wiped everything off, no restoring from backups. It's butter smooth and for some reason, all the GUI animations are very very fluid, locked solid FPS.

I believe LION is to windows vista as Mountain Lion is to Windows 7's level of improvement. It's very very smooth and stable.

Just the animations; even inside imessage app when incoming messages scroll in, it's super butter smooth.
 

Soulstorm

macrumors 68000
Feb 1, 2005
1,887
1
Mountain Lion's experience is very smooth for me. We all knew that Apple would upgrade the graphics under-the-hood quartz components in Mountain Lion, but I wouldn't believe I would notice a difference until I saw the performance of docking/undocking tabs from safari and Xcode, resizing windows, scrolling any kind of scroll view in OS X... everything seems snappier. Gives my 3 year old Macbook Pro some more life span!

Also, I think that something happened in the fonts... they somehow seem prettier... Could just be me, though.
 

Krazy Bill

macrumors 68030
Dec 21, 2011
2,985
3
I did a clean install, wiped everything off, no restoring from backups. It's butter smooth and for some reason, all the GUI animations are very very fluid, locked solid FPS.

I believe LION is to windows vista as Mountain Lion is to Windows 7's level of improvement. It's very very smooth and stable.

Just the animations; even inside imessage app when incoming messages scroll in, it's super butter smooth.

You're system is "smoother" because you did a clean install and removed crap and clutter that was bogging your system down.
 

NJRonbo

macrumors 68040
Jan 10, 2007
3,233
1,224
Yes....Yes....and....Yes.

Much smoother than Lion. Where you will find the most improvement is with Safari. Much faster.
 

stooovie

macrumors 6502a
Nov 21, 2010
836
314
I did upgrade to ML, feels roughly the same, benchmarks are LOWER though. Went from 8203 in Geekbench to roughly 8000. Cinebench: OpenGL from 40 to 35. 2011 iMac 21,5" with 24 GB RAM.
 
Last edited:

pepede

macrumors member
Mar 6, 2012
37
0
I did upgrade to ML, feels roughly the same, benchmarks are LOWER though. Went from 8203 in Geekbench to roughly 8000. Cinebench: OpenGL from 40 to 35. 2011 iMac 21,5" with 24 GB RAM.

me to same. I tested ML with NovaBench and i got 30fps in graphics test. Under Lion it was 57 fps.

Macbook pro early 2011 13'
 

iBug2

macrumors 601
Jun 12, 2005
4,540
863
Lion was slightly faster than SL and ML is around the same as Lion on my two machines. But the new Safari scrolling is much much faster. Cinebench or Geekbench results don't really matter. They can drop and increase from OS to OS and even inbetween point updates. Look at actual performance always. Lion had much better GPU drivers than SL so games ran better. But the cinebench results didn't differ.
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,521
19,678
ML seems to have an improved standard memory allocator, geekbench memory scores are significantly faster. But other scores were slightly lower, so the end score was virtually the same. I have no idea why integer ops etc. should be slower with ML as OS should not affect that. That on a 2009 C2D MBP. Maybe it had something to do with me running ML from an external USB enclosure as opposed to the internal SSD with Lion.

Other then that, the system felt lightning fast. ML Safari is really really snappy. I like the new animations :)
 

stooovie

macrumors 6502a
Nov 21, 2010
836
314
Yes, benchmark scores are not really a valid sign of real performance, but I was still surprised at the GPU drop. But I guess it's a GM of 10.8.0 anyway.
 

aznguyen316

macrumors 68010
Oct 1, 2008
2,001
1
Tampa, FL
I'll have to test NovaBench but I played Diablo 3 on 10.8 last night and it played fine, granted it was on all lows.. the FPS counter unfortunately is broken.
 

chrisherbert

macrumors regular
Jun 25, 2012
112
78
Lion gave me significantly better benchmark scores than Snow Leopard but it felt a lot of slower in actual use. I wouldn't pay any attention to benchmarks unless you're concerned about gaming.
 

Senseotech

macrumors 6502a
Nov 23, 2009
785
28
NC
I'll have to test NovaBench but I played Diablo 3 on 10.8 last night and it played fine, granted it was on all lows.. the FPS counter unfortunately is broken.

I'm running D3 on 10.7.4 and the FPS counter is broke; its not an OS issue, its an issue with one of the recent D3 patches I think.
 

Bear

macrumors G3
Jul 23, 2002
8,088
5
Sol III - Terra
Lion gave me significantly better benchmark scores than Snow Leopard but it felt a lot of slower in actual use. I wouldn't pay any attention to benchmarks unless you're concerned about gaming.
And if you're using benchmarks for gaming, it better be by someone using the game in question to benchmark the system.

Due to OpenGL improvements in Lion, graphic intensive games tended to be better off under Lion. I hope that the same is true for Mountain Lion in terms of OpenGL performance.
 

01mggt

macrumors 6502
Jun 23, 2010
309
11
I'm on a Late Model 2008 MBP with 8GB of ram and a 256GB SSD and it is much faster then Lion was.

This was my experience as well! But I was using a hyrbrid drive by seagate and it was way faster in my opinion. At least dp4 was (others builds were good but not as good). It honestly made my macbook feel more fresh and snappier.
 

danb77

macrumors 6502
Sep 4, 2007
442
3
All performance snappier, but general graphics performance in the OS is much much improved on my 2011 MacBook Air.
 

UKBeast

macrumors 6502a
Jan 21, 2010
626
53
Turkey
ML is much faster and snappier than lion on my system but comp works at higher tempratures and I hear fans ramp up. Maybe they will fix this.

I will definitely buy ml.

Yes, lion was windows vista and ml is win 7.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.