Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ilikewhey

macrumors 68040
May 14, 2014
3,616
4,680
nyc upper east
I just don’t see it. I have the iPhone 14 Pro Max. I have had several iPad Pros. I have the MacBook Pro M1 Max 16” and I don’t see anything different.

Now I also have a new iPad mini which I bought for reading. I hate it. I see jelly scrolling on the right side every time I use it. It makes me hate the iPad mini. I feel like I got duped. Apple absolutely ripped us all off on this one. It’s not 60Hz if it’s not evenly scrolling.

Second biggest disappointment ever for me from Apple behind the Apple Watch Series 4 in Stainless with the Saphire crystal. I wanted to trade it in for a Series 5 and Apple offered me $140 when I paid $800 for it less than a year prior. I ended up keeping it until I bought the Apple Watch Series 7 standard 45mm. Never will pay a bunch of money for an Apple Watch again. With the AppleCare+, it just doesn’t matter if the Apple Watch has an expensive sapphire crystal display when it’s likely going to get recycled or replaced within a few years.
are you from the future?
 

loybond

macrumors 6502a
Aug 1, 2010
856
631
The True North, Strong and Free
Loved it on my iPad pro, wasn't sure if it would be a big deal on the iPhone 13 pm, but turns out... I love it so much. I notice the buttery smoothness all the time.

I've been thinking about getting an iPad Mini as well, and when I played with it in the store, it felt like my in laws og iPad Air. It felt really slow. I then realized my wife's iPhone 8 feels slow to me for the same reason, the 60 Hz.
 

kasakka

macrumors 68020
Oct 25, 2008
2,389
1,078
So if I bought a Mac Studio now, and Apple or someone else came out with a 5K 120Hz monitor in a year or two, I wouldn't be able to enjoy the 120Hz on my Studio?
Correct. If it needs more bandwidth than the Mac can provide. It doesn’t even support HDMI 2.1 which is capable of higher bandwidth than DP 1.4.

But nothing supports DP 2.0 at the moment so this is all speculation.
 

autofree

macrumors member
Jul 30, 2008
59
50
Here are my thoughts on the ProMotion displays (I have the MBP 16, and iPhone 13 Pro Max). While there is a noticeable difference compared to 60hz, it's not a great as it could be.

ProMotion is adaptive, meaning it can go up to 120hz; it’s not running at 120hz (for obvious reasons like battery life). However, I don’t believe we get full 120hz most of the time. If you guys ever get a chance, look at the screen of something like the Sony Xperia Pro, which enabled 120hz only mode. The motion is buttery smooth for anything you do on the phone. Yes it eats up battery life, but it’s smoother than the iPhones ProMotion adaptive display.

Same for the MBP. While I love the MBP screen with smoother scrolling than at 60hz, it could be smoother if we could lock in the full 120hz.

It would be great if we had an option to force 120hz somehow (like when it’s plugged in). This would unlock the full potential of the 120hz display.
 

Saturn1217

macrumors 65816
Apr 28, 2008
1,360
1,048
I think it depends on the user. I don’t want to invalidate anyone else’s experience.

However, for me, no it does not make a difference. I use my 14” MBP on low power mode on battery and regular mode when plugged in. So I am constantly switching back and forth. I don’t notice a difference.

I also have an iPhone 13 Pro Max and on that device I immediately notice ProMotion and hate when it is disabled. So it isn’t that I don’t notice this type of thing. It is just not something that adds value when doing regular office tasks with a keyboard and mouse input at the normal sitting distance most people use a laptop.
 

woolypants

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 24, 2018
357
526
hate when it is disabled.

How do you do this? I thought it was always on.

I just figured out how to do it. It does make a difference! Animations seem to stutter without it on, like there's dropped frames.

For those that don't know, here's what Google says

> In the settings menu, scroll down and tap on “Accessibility.” Now, select “Motion” located under the Vision category to proceed. Here, you'll find the “Limit Frame Rate” setting, which is the last in the menu. Simply use the toggle to enable the limiter, which will lock the maximum frame rate to 60Hz.
 

headlessmike

macrumors 65816
May 16, 2017
1,439
2,843
How do you do this? I thought it was always on.

I just figured out how to do it. It does make a difference! Animations seem to stutter without it on, like there's dropped frames.

For those that don't know, here's what Google says

> In the settings menu, scroll down and tap on “Accessibility.” Now, select “Motion” located under the Vision category to proceed. Here, you'll find the “Limit Frame Rate” setting, which is the last in the menu. Simply use the toggle to enable the limiter, which will lock the maximum frame rate to 60Hz.
Toggling low power mode also disables Pro Motion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saturn1217

woolypants

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 24, 2018
357
526
LOL – I just figured
Toggling low power mode also disables Pro Motion.
Interesting, thanks. But if there's one device where low-power mode is surely not needed then it's the 13 Pro Max. The battery life is bonkers. I've not yet got below 50% across a full day before recharging, even if I play hours of games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ndouglas

playtech1

macrumors 6502a
Oct 10, 2014
695
889
It's surprisingly lacking in impact on my M1 MacBook Pro 16.

I had a Razer Blade 15 for a bit with a 144Hz display and the high refresh rate was a delight and very noticeable.

On the MacBook Pro it doesn't feel appreciably better than the 60Hz screen on my Air. I do think that the refresh rate benefits are being held back by a slow pixel response time on the panel. It's a stunningly good screen in other respects.
 

spiderman0616

Suspended
Aug 1, 2010
5,670
7,499
It's surprisingly lacking in impact on my M1 MacBook Pro 16.

I had a Razer Blade 15 for a bit with a 144Hz display and the high refresh rate was a delight and very noticeable.

On the MacBook Pro it doesn't feel appreciably better than the 60Hz screen on my Air. I do think that the refresh rate benefits are being held back by a slow pixel response time on the panel. It's a stunningly good screen in other respects.
For me, the smaller the screen, the more I feel I benefit from ProMotion. I definitely notice it's there on my iPhone and definitely noticed it was there on my iPad Pros when I had those devices. I do NOT notice it on either of my MacBooks to the degree where I usually forget they even have it.

That being said, when I go from my 13 Pro Max to my iPad mini 6, I don't remember ever thinking, "Wow, what a crappy screen." I adjust pretty quickly.
 

playtech1

macrumors 6502a
Oct 10, 2014
695
889
For me, the smaller the screen, the more I feel I benefit from ProMotion. I definitely notice it's there on my iPhone and definitely noticed it was there on my iPad Pros when I had those devices. I do NOT notice it on either of my MacBooks to the degree where I usually forget they even have it.
It's definitely noticeable when comparing iPads with and without, but on iPhone I have never noticed the lack of it on my iPhone 13 Mini, which feels just as smooth as the 13 Pro - I think the OLED panel is so responsive that it does a lot of the heavy lifting in making things feel smooth even without ProMotion.

I find high refresh even more important on large screens - my 34 inch ultrawide at 100Hz is great but feels almost unusable at 60Hz due to the slight flicker in my peripheral vision.
 

ignatius345

macrumors 604
Aug 20, 2015
7,622
13,037
A visit to the Apple Store is a pretty easy way to see the different refresh rates side by side. I definitely noticed it, but HDR was a bigger "wow" factor at the store. If you open Photos and start viewing some of those HDR videos on different displays, you can really see a massive difference.
 
Last edited:

spiderman0616

Suspended
Aug 1, 2010
5,670
7,499
A visit to the Apple Store is a pretty easy way to see the different refresh rates side by side. I myself definitely noticed it.

HDR was, to me, a bigger "wow" factor at the store. If you open Photos and start viewing some of those HDR videos on different displays, you can really see a massive difference.
No HDR is a bigger deal breaker for me on a display or TV. Once you have it, it's hard not to have it.
 

woolypants

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 24, 2018
357
526
I had a visit to the Apple Store today to take a look for myself.

In my eyes, it's feels exactly the same as the iPhone 13 Pro Max:
  • Animations like Expose or resizing window look eerily smooth. It's quite odd to experience, having used macOS now for 20 years on 60Hz or lower displays.
  • Scrolling is smoother. But it's a mess. For example, scrolling in Safari isn't like you're watching a piece of paper being rapidly raised and lowered. The text smears badly just as it does on a 60 or 30Hz display.
  • That's it. It seemed more noticeable to me on the 16in MBP compared to the 14in.
 

spiderman0616

Suspended
Aug 1, 2010
5,670
7,499
I had a visit to the Apple Store today to take a look for myself.

In my eyes, it's feels exactly the same as the iPhone 13 Pro Max:
  • Animations like Expose or resizing window look eerily smooth. It's quite odd to experience, having used macOS now for 20 years on 60Hz or lower displays.
  • Scrolling is smoother. But it's a mess. For example, scrolling in Safari isn't like you're watching a piece of paper being rapidly raised and lowered. The text smears badly just as it does on a 60 or 30Hz display.
  • That's it. It seemed more noticeable to me on the 16in MBP compared to the 14in.
I think this is why I don’t notice it as much on Mac. I spend a LOT of my day in Safari.
 

tmoerel

Suspended
Jan 24, 2008
1,005
1,570
ProMotion is actually very relevant for power saving. When there is no activity on the screen it can refresh it at a much lower fps which results in lower power usage.
 

headlessmike

macrumors 65816
May 16, 2017
1,439
2,843
ProMotion is actually very relevant for power saving. When there is no activity on the screen it can refresh it at a much lower fps which results in lower power usage.
In theory, yes. But ProMotion is actually disabled when low power mode is on. Constantly switching refresh rates appears to require more resources than just leaving it fixed at 60 Hz.
 

Zest28

macrumors 68030
Jul 11, 2022
2,582
3,934
It's a huge difference. First I thought the M2 MBA was thermal throttling or not having enough CPU power to do basic light tasks, but it was simply that 60hz display that makes the M2 MBA feel so sluggish.

However my TV, iPhone, Mac and iPads are 120hz, so I guess I'm used to 120hz and 60hz just looks weird to me.

Best is for you to test it out yourself. If you are lucky, you don't see the difference between 60hz and 120hz. For me, it is a huge difference.
 

Zest28

macrumors 68030
Jul 11, 2022
2,582
3,934
In theory, yes. But ProMotion is actually disabled when low power mode is on. Constantly switching refresh rates appears to require more resources than just leaving it fixed at 60 Hz.

My M1 12.9 iPad Pro feels so sluggish in low powered mode, because it is being forced to 60hz instead of 120hz.

I was thinking at first to keep it low power mode on all the time on the 12.9 M1 iPad Pro, but I didn't think this sluggish feeling was worth the increase in battery life. 120hz is just too good. I will take the hit in battery life for a more enjoyable user experience.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.