Could anyone link to a writeup of Garmin's lineup, was interested for the longest time but still can't quite get my head around their offerings.
I disagree completely with this, having owned practically every Apple Watch since the Series 2 including a Sapphire/SS Cellular S5 and a Garmin Fenix 6X Pro.
Aluminium is a soft metal and its inclusion on the Apple Watch may look premium but it isn't. It scratches and dents easily along with the glass which has NO bezel protection; also, my SS AW was easily chipped to my disappointment just when playing golf!
The Fenix/Epix range are "tool" watches. They are primarily about function over form; the nylon/plastic body keeps the weight down while the SS back and bezel enhance durability and protect the screen.
Garmin watches use standard bands depending on your case size (20mm, 22mm etc). As a result, the third party band market is much larger than the Apple Watch. Garmin's QuickFit bands simply allow the straps to be quickly swapped out with the pin left in. This is handy, for example, when swapping between using it as a bike computer and a watch (remember, it's a tool!). For a massive selection of QuickFit bands at ultra-low prices, look on AliExpress.
Try dcrainmaker
Aluminium is a soft metal and its inclusion on the Apple Watch may look premium but it isn't. It scratches and dents easily along with the glass which has NO bezel protection; also, my SS AW was easily chipped to my disappointment just when playing golf!
The Fenix/Epix range are "tool" watches. They are primarily about function over form; the nylon/plastic body keeps the weight down while the SS back and bezel enhance durability and protect the screen.
My 3 years of experience with the AW was good and had no issue with the finishing of either the body or the screen. And I used it for sports, including swimming in the sea.
As a tool watch, the Garmin is probably the best smartwatch out there, no doubt. But I like my watches to look and feel premium as well, not just do good. I am probably a form before function guy
I got more comments for wearing an Apple Watch (in the day) than I did wearing the fenix. The fenix was more Swiss Army Knife, and as such had features that a mere mortal would likely never use. It 'looked butch', but when the finish started fading in the first year, I grew unimpressed. But it *did* a lot, and most of it I'd never use.
But get the 'tool' you want. There are different hammers (like I was blown away seeing how many different hammers there are out there) there are different screwdrivers, and different watches. Get what you think will serve you best, but don't rain on people that like the Apple Watch.
Just keep moving. The longer people are sedate the more chance of mold and rust to take hold. It makes fighting gravity that much harder. Rock on!
-=-=-=-
This similar discussion has occurred on many of the bicycling sites I am on. Is it better to have a dedicated bike computer, or use a 'watch'. In the end, use what you need. The fenix was overkill, to me, for a 'bike watch, plus having to glance at my wrist for speed and directions seems needlessly clumsy and potentially more calamity prone, but others would quit if they had to give up their do-it-all watch (although I doubt that, but)... Runners get into that discussion too. Use what you will use. I can see a fenix style watch being necessary for running. Apple *should* do better on making the AW work for exercise and outdoor activities. To have the battery life take that much of a hit, but we've all mentioned battery life numerous times...
Should Apple do a solar powered Apple Watch? (YES PLEASE!!!)
$1000 Swiss Army Knife with $50 China Watch build quality? LOL
It depends what you are doing with the watch and how rough you are. I’ve worn my aluminium series 5 for more than 2 and a half years now and don’t have any dents or scratches. The series 2 I had before it was 3 years old and clear of inclusions. It’s more down to the wearer than the actual materials of the product.I disagree completely with this, having owned practically every Apple Watch since the Series 2 including a Sapphire/SS Cellular S5 and a Garmin Fenix 6X Pro.
Aluminium is a soft metal and its inclusion on the Apple Watch may look premium but it isn't. It scratches and dents easily along with the glass which has NO bezel protection; also, my SS AW was easily chipped to my disappointment just when playing golf!
It depends what you are doing with the watch and how rough you are. I’ve worn my aluminium series 5 for more than 2 and a half years now and don’t have any dents or scratches. The series 2 I had before it was 3 years old and clear of inclusions. It’s more down to the wearer than the actual materials of the product.
And luck. The stainless AW I had that had the dent, would have needed a new face if that dent was just a little more towards the top/face side. Never discount luck. I dropped a TAG Heuer and it landed on just the right spot to shatter the face crystal. I had it for less than a month. My luck ran out. Expensive...
I got more comments for wearing an Apple Watch (in the day) than I did wearing the fenix. The fenix was more Swiss Army Knife, and as such had features that a mere mortal would likely never use. It 'looked butch', but when the finish started fading in the first year, I grew unimpressed. But it *did* a lot, and most of it I'd never use.
But get the 'tool' you want. There are different hammers (like I was blown away seeing how many different hammers there are out there) there are different screwdrivers, and different watches. Get what you think will serve you best, but don't rain on people that like the Apple Watch.
Just keep moving. The longer people are sedate the more chance of mold and rust to take hold. It makes fighting gravity that much harder. Rock on!
-=-=-=-
This similar discussion has occurred on many of the bicycling sites I am on. Is it better to have a dedicated bike computer, or use a 'watch'. In the end, use what you need. The fenix was overkill, to me, for a 'bike watch, plus having to glance at my wrist for speed and directions seems needlessly clumsy and potentially more calamity prone, but others would quit if they had to give up their do-it-all watch (although I doubt that, but)... Runners get into that discussion too. Use what you will use. I can see a fenix style watch being necessary for running. Apple *should* do better on making the AW work for exercise and outdoor activities. To have the battery life take that much of a hit, but we've all mentioned battery life numerous times...
Should Apple do a solar powered Apple Watch? (YES PLEASE!!!)
The downside to the Garmin watches, even though they’re popular, is they don’t sell enough to create a big secondary band market. And Garmin’s own proprietary bands are just too expensive, as they seem to be following Apple’s lead in pricing them at the top end of what people are willing to spend.
My battery life if I stuck to only 1 moderate workout a day, and just a couple GPS runs in a week, I could get up to 6 days before hitting 0.Funny you mention using your VA 3 for camping. That's one of the reasons I moved to Garmin full time. I like being able to charge it before i go knowing the battery will last all weekend.
What was the battery life on your VA 3 when you first bought it? I've been looking at getting the 4 next time it drops in price.
Well, that didn't last long 😂I've already sold our backup AW and am transitioning to either an EPIX or 955 for 24/7 wear.
Well, that didn't last long
Back to Garmin for sleeping and workouts, AW for everything else.
I'm more reliant on Siri timers and reminders than I care to admit. Plus, I can never find my phone (and the AW pings it more reliably than Garmin does).Why is that?
I ended up getting the Captain America vivoactive 4. My battery life seems to be on par with what you were getting. After about 5 days it was down to just below 40%. That was after 2 workouts and keeping it bluetooth paired maybe 3 of those days. I was surprised at how fast it charged!My battery life if I stuck to only 1 moderate workout a day, and just a couple GPS runs in a week, I could get up to 6 days before hitting 0.
I got 5 full days in France back in 2019, not doing any workouts, but walking over 15,000 steps a day, and even sleeping with it.
GPS workouts will eat a little more battery.
I was very happy with its longevity.
It would also charge from 0-100% in seemingly less than 2hrs. (Never officially timed it, but it was fast enough never to think about)
Well a month in, how do you like the Epix. I absolutely love mine and looking forward to the upcoming additional metrics we are going to get that the 255 and 955 have now. Its in beta, so should be a month or two.There is no doubt that the plastic bodies Garmin uses aren’t the same as full metal bodies like what Apple uses, but the titanium sandwich version with sapphire lens isn’t cheap looking or feeling, to me. I also love the fact that it has even better water resistance.
Perfect timing - I was just looking at it this morning, as I’m wearing a polo shirt today at work, so it is visible all the time and I thought to myself how great it’s been so far. Crazy that I’ve charged it twice in the past month - love that benefit. Yeah, I saw that they’ve got a beta now with some of those other features. I was tempted to jump on the beta program, but figured I’d just wait it out since I’m still learning the watch and all its features.Well a month in, how do you like the Epix. I absolutely love mine and looking forward to the upcoming additional metrics we are going to get that the 255 and 955 have now. Its in beta, so should be a month or two.
Yea I'm waiting too. I don't like beta testing. LOL Glad you're enjoying the watch too.Perfect timing - I was just looking at it this morning, as I’m wearing a polo shirt today at work, so it is visible all the time and I thought to myself how great it’s been so far. Crazy that I’ve charged it twice in the past month - love that benefit. Yeah, I saw that they’ve got a beta now with some of those other features. I was tempted to jump on the beta program, but figured I’d just wait it out since I’m still learning the watch and all its features.
It is awesomeI think Epix 2 has even better screen than AW. During activity that screen is super black and letters are shinning even in the direct sunlight. Might have less colors than AW but still very very good.