You mean like these?……No more “pro” this “pro” that. (How can consumer electronics dare carry “pro” moniker! /s).
Attachments
Last edited:
You mean like these?……No more “pro” this “pro” that. (How can consumer electronics dare carry “pro” moniker! /s).
The current 10 sells for $449, the 9 is $329. Unless one of those price tiers goes away the lineup is muddy. But Apple won’t sell an Air for $449 or a 10 for $329 so…Apple has good, better, best (10, Air, and Pros). The 9 will be discontinued soon and the Mini is unique due to its small size.
The 9 will go away so the lineup isn’t muddied.The current 10 sells for $449, the 9 is $329. Unless one of those price tiers goes away the lineup is muddy. But Apple won’t sell an Air for $449 or a 10 for $329 so…
exactly, regardless of the final price of the entry level iPad it's a temporary situation.The 9 will go away so the lineup isn’t muddied.
No one thought that the iPhone SE muddied the iPhone lineup, so I’m not sure why the iPad 9 caused confusion.exactly, regardless of the final price of the entry level iPad it's a temporary situation.
Some people seem to be bothered by having more choice... or think they are smarter than Apple when it comes to the product range that maximises their profits in a given timeframe..No one thought that the iPhone SE muddied the iPhone lineup, so I’m not sure why the iPad 9 caused confusion.
So does the 10 become $329 and then there’s an 11 for $449 or is there nothing for $329 any more?The 9 will go away so the lineup isn’t muddied.
I want to edit Final Cut timelines with this toothbrush.You mean like these?
I agree with this.There are people who are going to be confused regardless of the number of options available to them. I'm half tempted to come up with an interactive buyer's guide where people rank the importance of various features and capacities and at the end, a recommendation based on those weighted answers is presented.
But as we've witnessed in numerous "which should I buy.." threads, the requester often hasn't given much consideration to their needs/wants or want contradictory things like, "I want a 12.9" iPad but want it to be small and compact".
The current lineup offers something for everyone at every price point. I appreciate that. Those who want to go all-out and buy a $1900 iPad, Apple provides one for them. For those who want a basic iPad at an affordable price, they offer that too... and everything in between.
Maybe if they move the camera to the long side, we can get a USB-C in each short side?
And once the 13" MacBook got a metal case, the line stopped because it was redundant compared to the 13" MacBook Pro.I recall at one point the iPad Air kind of went a way because that was just how redundant it became also...
You would remove the mid-price iPad Air so that a buyer who wants to get a laminated display in order to avoid the annoying screen reflectivity of the old and new base models (which makes them pretty much useless outside) has no choice but to jump all the way up to spending $800 for the Pro model?I think the iPad Air should go.
the 10.9 with the new pencil is a great stop gap between base and pro.
Yes. I would. Upsell baby.You would remove the mid-price iPad Air so that a buyer who wants to get a laminated display in order to avoid the annoying screen reflectivity of the old and new base models (which makes them pretty much useless outside) has no choice but to jump all the way up to spending $800 for the Pro model?
Really cruel, dude.
I was in Target the other day. I overheard a dad commenting on the Nintendo Switch Pro Controller. Basically mocking that it’s only for professionals. It got a small chuckle out of me as I thought about all these random things that have Pro in the name.You mean like these?
Well, clearly Apple thought better of that strategy since they found that most of the people in the entry-level demographic were either unwilling or unable to pay $461** more for ”Pro” features they did not need or want, but a significant portion of them would “stretch” to $599 for an iPad Air that was better in meaningful ways (an assumption which turned out to be true).Yes. I would. Upsell baby.
9 is a good product, especially when you can get it on sale for $250. Not everyone needs something blazing fast. And really the home button works well and is familiar to many.The 9 will go away so the lineup isn’t muddied.
Very true, many of my retiree students bought that same iPad for that same price, and they couldn’t be happier.9 is a good product, especially when you can get it on sale for $250. Not everyone needs something blazing fast. And really the home button works well and is familiar to many.
No reason to spend nearly $500 for an 8 year old or an 80 year old with basic needs.
People often mistakenly, or intentionally to try make a point, compare the sale price of one thing against the new price of another. While the iPad 9 is a great iPad at $250, and you're correct that is all many people need, although I would argue that an 80 year old eyesight would benefit from the 10's larger screen, the iPad 10 is currently discounted to $400 so it's not "nearly $500".9 is a good product, especially when you can get it on sale for $250. Not everyone needs something blazing fast. And really the home button works well and is familiar to many.
No reason to spend nearly $500 for an 8 year old or an 80 year old with basic needs.
It's not a matter of blazing fast, all current iPads are... it's many other things and not just the screen, also the speakers, the RAM with constant reloads of tabs in Safari with 3GB but it's all relative, since much depends on how one uses the device (for instance my old mini 2 is used just for one app and is great at that, so I could say it's a great device for what I use it for... but admittedly terrible otherwise..)9 is a good product, especially when you can get it on sale for $250. Not everyone needs something blazing fast. And really the home button works well and is familiar to many.
No reason to spend nearly $500 for an 8 year old or an 80 year old with basic needs.
$450 + tax is indeed nearly $500.People often mistakenly, or intentionally to try make a point, compare the sale price of one thing against the new price of another. While the iPad 9 is a great iPad at $250, and you're correct that is all many people need, although I would argue that an 80 year old eyesight would benefit from the 10's larger screen, the iPad 10 is currently discounted to $400 so it's not "nearly $500".