brikeh said:
Yeah I understand that but people on these boards get a little rabid at times, QC is an issue. I couldnt care less about IBM or Dell, I buy Macs.
Im staying clear of the MBP for now....
Hopefully with the next revision things improve somewhat. What really cracks me up though is those people who just look at the name
MacBook Pro and conclude that it must be for
Pros, for running
Pro apps, for
Professionals. The same way that only Quicktime
Pro can play videos full screen! You need to make money out of watching videos to use such functionality!
Sorry guys, just because Apple's marketing says so doesn't make it true. If I feel like it I can be running FCP on a Macbook
Non Pro for all I want. And likewise the
Pro in Macbook
Pro really doesn't justify quite a fair bit of these issues.
Things are improving.. sure, but to call this Pro? A EOS 1 series camera, that's
pro. Ditto for a Nikon D2 series camera, not to offend the Nikonians. That's
pro too. Likewise I'd say an AK-47 is pretty pro, although in my experience I can't say the same for an American M-16, but hey, I digress. But a Macbook Pro? Pro? Can you depend on it? Is it absolutely reliable?
Ha!
A Thinkpad is a lot more
pro than this. You can drop it, run it over with a truck, throw it out in the woods and let the elements have a go at it for a month, and pick it up and have it keep chugging along. A Macbook
Pro can barely even hold its shape when you bump it into something, and may Allah, Jesus, and Buddha help you if you ever drop it, not that they'd be able to help anyway.
Ultimately it boils down to form over function. What matters to you more?
if Apple ain't so anal about not having a single heat vent on the bottom panel, a lot of these heat issues could be avoided. Likewise if Apple decided that the 15" MBP can be 2-3mm thicker, perhaps we can all have a DL DVD burner in them today! Oh, and nevermind the bit about how aluminium is such a good RF shield, an issue that they only resolved recently with an
innovation of coating the RF antennas with rubber! Wow, brilliant! The rest of the "Pee Cee" industry just wisen up and do their materials research right from the go get!
So today, we have machines that run very hot. Machines that have no DL drives. Machines that only until the last 2 revisions (I consider the MBP a revision of the old PB design really) started having wireless reception that is closer to what they should be. I wouldn't bring the whine in now as they've apparently fixed it with a new logic board replacement. With these on the table, let me ask you this.
1) Would a laptop being 3mm thicker affect you in anyway?
2) Would a heat vent on the bottom panel ruin the look that much? Sure, Jonathan Ives might want a clean unbroken design, but hey, it is not like their QC is that great that they can even *gasp* make batteries that are flush with the rest of the laptop, or even have the lid close down flush with the wrist rest, why bother at all?
A design flaw is a design flaw. All these "ooohs" and "ahhhhh" that come out from Macheads with each Stevenote are really plain... for lack of a better word, pure fanboism. What's so great about the rubber hinge for instance? That whole issue would have been mitigated completely had they choosen a better design!
Don't get me wrong, I do kind of lean towards the MBP/PB design. I just don't like the way it is going, how the practical aspects of the device's design takes a backseat in favor of its aesthetics. If Apple can make a device that'd
1) looks good
2) can take a beating
3) works great.
Then kudos to them! In fact that'd be worthy of a
pro tag. As it is, it scores somewhat well for 1), but outright fails 2), and for quite a large number of users barely passes 3). Sorry Apple, you aren't trying hard enough. In fact I'd rather you try less hard on 1) and get the fundamental 2) and 3) right first.