andiwm2003 said:i can't agree more. that's why i'm leaning towards the macbook.
1) it still looks great
2) it can take a beating and even if it gets scratched it's a much cheaper machine that's scratched. and who cares about scratched plastic
3) if you aren't too sensitve about the "moo" i haven't heard about a major problem like frequent logic board failures or so.
The beauty about scratched plastic is.... a $5 can of "Brasso" will polish up all the Macs you will ever own in your lifetime.
KingYaba said:About the four MacBook Pros, that is just bad luck. Holy crap .
I see some attitudes that PCs are all non-working crap boxes. Though out of the millions and millions sold, only a small minority have issues. The same should be expected out of Apple. Just Apple is on a smaller scale. Secondly Apple is branding Intel chips that have been used in PCs for years? So isn't it natural that PC issues may start to plague Apple since they are both using the Same Processors?
Erm, can you please elaborate more on "PC" issues? It is not like machines on x86 has some intrinsic property that'd make them more susceptible to "issues", they'd probably be more vulnerable to buffer overrun exploits than machines on PPC, but it is not like these can't be mitigated (well, let at FreeBSD).
As for stuff like virus and spyware, all the star developers in the world won't be able to help you if you are constantly running your computer in a state where any application you run is in a God state!
That's precisely how it is like on Windows systems by default, since by default all users in Windows XP are administrators, and even if the people who did the programming for your OS were very careful to not have any exploits in their product (which the boys in Microsoft didn't do btw), it is not like any software that you choose to download and install for yourself would adhere to such good practices either.