The second is parts availability: Apple in the mid-to-later 2010s really got serious about prohibiting its vendors from selling replacement parts to any buyer other than Apple. This is a big crux in the discussion around right-to-repair. A very good case example, relevant here: with the retina displays (they are manufactured by LG), Apple prohibits LG contractually from selling spares to any third-party. This has resulted in the rise of used rMBPs being parted out for working display assemblies (as well as other parts) at profusely inflated prices, as the ability to source new-stock is not possible — forcing a scarcity which isn’t caused by economics or limited resources but by Apple having the power to dictate how the repair of Apple-branded devices shall go (or not, as has been the case and as has also been their wont).
This is very helpful and interesting. How does the FTC vote from this summer fit into this? Is the hope that Apple products will be moving back toward the more repair-able setups like the 2008-2015 models in the future?