Subjective matter and that should be obvious just from reading this thread if not daily observation in the real world. Each person needs to decide based on his/her own preferences. This is not another one-size-fits-all matter. Never assume your preferences are universal on any topic.All science a side, if the plot and acting are good enough, you pay attention to the film, not the tech specs. If the compression bothers you enough, the plot and acting aren't enough to immerse the viewers and you probably should not waste your time watching the film.
Note the "I'll" in your comment? I = you. You have control over your own preferences. That's it. Other people control theirs. Not sure why so many seem to be unable to grasp this and feel the need to dictate preference to others.I'll take a good 480p film with a good story, blown up to an 80 foot screen in theater, compared to the latest crap film somewhere else.
Value is subjective no matter what the topic. Depends on who you ask.For the sake of nothing for than playing devil's advocate - is there really a ton of value in owning movies anymore?
Based on what? You can't assume trends from your own preferences. Trends are never defined by a single data point. Again, this is a subjective matter. The words "justification" and "I feel" in your statement are the clues that these are subjective matters. Some people can't justify any movie purchases. Some people justify massive purchases. Many fall somewhere in between. It's not a universal matter and it's not an either-or matter.I would say everybody is going to have about a dozen titles that they honestly watch enough to justify a purchase, but there's just so much content out there to watch if not free then very cheaply that I just don't feel the same draw to own that I used to.
Last edited: