Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Logic Audio

I understand the complaints regarding USB for audio. Someone here said they use OS 9.2.2 with USB and that works just fine and OS X does not. If that is true, then you have to rule out hardware as the issue as that post did.

I have a question as I am a lot more into video then audio. I am considering getting my feet wet with audio and I wanted to know if the new G4 towers with Audio in, so they advertise, would solve all these issues I am reading about.

Is there a reason you must use USB or FireWire interface devices? Someone posted that they have tested hardware from G3s to the latest Dual G4s. Why the use of USB for audio and not LINE IN on the computers that offer that port?

Thanks,

Alex
 
A post on Apple discussions suggests that bandwidth may be an issue with at least some USB audio problems:

http://discussions.info.apple.com/WebX?50@156.a5xha1VVcgb.63@.3bb9bb57/0

(If URL fails, try Apple Support -> discussions -> Mac OS X > Using Technologies > Audio > i Sub fix that WORKS for 10.2)

If what this user suggests is true, it's possible that Apple *can't* fix the USB audio issues until they sell Macs with more or faster USB ports.

I am with those that are saying Apple should never have emphasized USB audio the way they have. USB just isn't suitable for audio, or any other high-bandwidth applcation.
 
Originally posted by Pepzhez
The only problem is that OS X is 100% ABSOLUTELY USELESS FOR AUDIO!!! Sadly, Jaguar did NOT fix the serious flaws in OS X. That is, USB and Firewire devices do not work properly - unacceptable levels of distortions, pops and crackles are present.

I'm curious as to how exactly you've determined this. There's not exactly a ton of OSX Audio apps available right now.

why is it that the current Linux audio core works one thousand times better than Apple's (which doesn't work at all, really)?

And what Linux audio core apps are you currently using for multi-track? Sequencing?

I really did hope that Jaguar would finally correct this problem once and for all. Imagine my disappointment in discovering that Apple did not even address the problem, much less attempt to correct it. -SNIP-

We have extensively tested OS X - from 10.1.0 to 10.2 - for our production environment (professional audio - for both music and film) - from the lowliest G3 imac to the latest dual gig PowerMac - all with the same sad results.

Sorry, but I'm having a BIT of a hard time with this. 10.2 has only been released for at best a couple weeks now, and LAP was literally just released yesterday. I'm a software developer by trade, and I'd have a tough time saying I'd "extensively" tested ANYTHING in two weeks, let alone one day.

Our only option - that is, if we want to get any work done - is to either run OS 9.2 (too unstable, unfortunately) or Linux (which has been working quite well). I've decided against buying a new PowerMac for myself, and will be running SuSE Linux on a dual gig Athlon for audio production. What other choice has Apple given me?

Front what I can tell, apparently none. No offense, but you sound like every other "Linux is the only answer to everything" type I've ran into. The problem here is simple: There aren't any truly pro quality audio (or video or 3D for that matter) apps for Linux. Why? Because there's no money in it. So few people run Linux as a primary operating system that you make the Mac users look like the overwhelming majority in comparison. Companies can't afford to dedicate dozens of man years to a product that will only sell to a miniscule % of the population (and I'm not talking about Macs here, Logic has a couple hundred thousand installed copies). Any product with the development scope of a multitracking / sequencing / plugin supporting type like Logic, Pro Tools, CuBase or Digital Performer is a multi million dollar development process. You don't pour millions into something that if you're lucky you might get a 50-100K return on. It's suicide. Sorry to break any bubbles here, but that is fiscal reality.

IMHO, most of your post appeared to me to be a non fact based rant, which is great for entertainment value (I get to guess which orafice the verbage comes out of) but doesn't do much in terms of real education. Of course, this IS a rumors board, and rumors boards have a tendency to attract, well you know, the stuff that flies are drawn too.

=)

Have a lovely day.
 
Originally posted by PastorOfMuppets
I am noticing a lot of "audio professionals" complaining about USB audio problems, and I have this to say: why the f*** are you using a USB audio interface?

Look, USB 1.0 can only do 1.5MB/s, and since the Mac's built-in USB ports are connected to an internal hub, that 1.5MB/s is shared between all your devices. Now, based on my calculations, 1 second of 24/96 audio is about 1MB (24 bits per sample, 96,000 samples per second, PCM compression ratio of aproximately 2:1).

The truth is, USB is "simply unusable" for anything higher than CD quality, and I would recomend not using it for anything other than connecting peripherals.

I am using USB audio AT HOME, in the studio we use an RME multiface. Anyway, the emi 2|6 suits me just fine. For one, I rarely record external audio at all and when I do it's never more than one stereo track at a time. I am basically all virtual. I use the EVP 88, Absynth, Metasynth, Exs24, Reason and a variety of plugins. It has worked flawlessly in 9.2 and the latest ASIO drivers for the emi 2|6 have incredibly low latency. Plus, the fact that it is made by emagic/Apple means it will "get along" with my studio well. I have even used it for live performance with Ableton Live without a hiccup. My problem is not USB. My problem is USB in OSX.
 
Originally posted by pev

What a load of ****. These boards are full of people making sweeping statements trying to sound informed... Logic X is *not* "simply unusable". Last night I installed it. Easy. Imported a few of my tracks, pressed play, off they went, no problems. No glitching, smooth performance and snappy. That doesnt seem "unusable" to me. If you want credibility, perhaps consider saying something more carefully written?

What I meant was that it's unusable for ME. I am really proud of you that your studio is tip-top and running smoothly but the fact is that mine is not, atleast under OS X. But thanks for the really helpful and informative reply! Your "credibility" with me is through the roof and I'll be sure and call on you for technical assistance in the future. Rock on!
Anyone WITHOUT a childish attitude care to share the details of their functional Logic X setup?
 
Ok. I read the referenced theads..

After reading through the rest of this thread, AND going to the Apple Support discussions site, I've made the following observations: (LONG WINDED POST ALERT!)

I'm finally beginning to get a functioning audio workstation again. I installed SuSE Linux on my imac DVSE, downloaded Ecasound and have been experimenting all week long. The current Linux audio core supports most USB devices, and this set-up is running the UA-30 flawlessly. Not a single crackle or distortion to be heard at any time (Take that, OS 10.2!) I am impressed.

iMac DVSE? This is the platform of choice to do serious work on? It doesn't even have a slot! That's like bitching about trying to run the Indy 500 in a Yugo and not understanding why you keep losing.

Most of the posts under both the USB audio and "List your audio problems here" theads were about USB speakers (particularly the iSub). Now granted, from the sounds of things, this is a very real problem for the users affected. However, if you consider yourself a "pro" and you're planning on mixing down on USB (or any computer speaker for that matter) you really should consider an alternate career path. There's a reason they make studio monitors. There's a reason you have your room tuned, RPG diffused and bass trapped. If you don't know why, you should seriously consider finding out.

Some background. I ran a 24 track studio in the 80's. After a two decade hiatus from the music biz, I'm building a new studio in my home. The first thing I did was get a proper machine. A dedicated machine. There's no games, no word processors, or anything else on it. Now I've got a Cube I dearly love, which I've upgraded to the hilt, but I wouldn't for a second use it for Logic, because I've yet to see firewire as a viable means for audio I/O, let alone USB. I went with a Delta 1010 for the following reasons:

1) It sits directly on the PCI bus. This has the benefit of guaranteed packet delivery to the proc, which USB and Firewire do not. They are inherently at the mercy of other processes on the system. USB I wouldn't trust to anything but keyboards, mice and digital camera file xfers. My cube has USB audio, and I file it under the "neat toys" category, but nothing I'd use for serious work.

2) It's stackable. You can load up as many 1010's as you have slots for, and Logic can see them all. I rather doubt that stunt would come off too well using MOTU's firewire products.

This isn't to say the Delta is the be all and end all, it just offered the most inherent reliability over USB and Firewire architectures. Firewire has room for improvement. I'm holding out for the next version, and based on it' specs, it perhaps can really deliver for real time audio.

I mentioned speakers earlier. I'm running a pair of Mackie 824's for near field and Tannoy's for far field. Even with these great speaks and a well planned and wired room, I'm still not releasing a damn thing out of this studio yet. Why? The room isn't finished. I haven't done the proper accoustical treatments, and until I do, anything I mix in here will ONLY sound good in here and I know it. As will any other professional.

The point I'm trying to make here, is that you can't expect pro quality results when you're using what amounts to (no offense) consumer toys. I like iMacs. They're cute, they do what they're supposed to do, and I'll probably get my wife one for Christmas or something. However, I'd never even attempt to try to run an audio business off of one. The same holds with USB audio I/O. It's fine for some limited applications, but to try use it for multitrack/mixing work is nuts. I know Emagic, MidiMan and slug of other folks have cranked these things out, because the market wants something that's "cheap". Perhaps they've (the I/O manufacturers) overtouted what the USB capabilities are, but gang, there's only so much you can stuff through a USB pipe, and since nearly everything in the system can preempt the data stream, you don't stand much of chance in terms of reliability.

Next: The Finger Pointing at Apple for the USB problems:
I don't blame Apple for Emagic's and M Audio's marketing decisions. They targeted those devices at BOTH platforms, remember? And this was LONG before Apple bought Emagic. Let's make an attempt at keeping history in it's proper perspective.

Finally:

I installed LAP 5.3 yesterday as well. And I DID have problems, in that my AMT-8 was not recognized by either 10.2 OR LAP. It eventually showed up, and it turns out the problem is apparently a conflict between the Midi driver for the Delta 1010 and the AMT8's driver. This was a bit of a shock, and almost seems like a PC sort of problem that we Mac users pride ourselves on not having to deal with.

However, I'll give Apple/Emagic/Midiman the benefit of the doubt for the moment for the following reasons:

1) Apple just acquired Emagic a short time ago. Changes cannot happen overnight.

2) 10.2 is new. Like a couple weeks old in fact. The Pro Audio aspect is a smaller part of the big picture, (for us, obviously it's the most important part) and I'm sure the audio part probably could have used more testing, but was it worth holding an entire OS release over in the big scheme of things? Probably not.

3) Midiman and Emagic (and the other "3rd party vendors" haven't had a lot of time to really dig into 10.2. I don't consider 10.1.x a viable platform for audio anyway, as it really wasn't the focus of any of those releases. Apple was far more concerned with the masses (i.e. Photoshop / FCP / etc) getting those bugs worked out. Us Audio types are a smaller population. We're important yes, but they do have to prioritize. Guess what? So does MicroSloth. I'd rather hedge my bet on Apple, since MS is going to prioritize where it always has. Big businesses that buy Windows and MS Office in lots of 1000. Apple know's it can't win that one, which means we stand a far greater chance of being catered to.

4) I can't pin this on OSX 10.2 completely. I had similar midi conflicts between the 1010 and the AMT8 back in 9.2 until I took the 1010's Midi out of the picture completely.

Back to the LAP 5 .3 install:

Once I got the AMT8 recognized, the rest was flawless. I opened a project I'd done under 9.2 and LAP 5.3 offered to convert the audio tracks and audio object references over to CoreAudio for me, (which it did without a hitch, even to the extent of letting me know my 9.x vst plugs weren't availabe). I switched those plug references over to the closest Logic Native alternative and doinked play on the control surface (which also works flawlessly under 10.2/LAP 5.3 once the midi got right).

This track had:

9 Audio tracks
6 EXS24's (two of which were multi channel, the drums alone ate up an additional 11 aux audio tracks)
2 ES2's
1 ESE
1 offboard Midi part (Roland JP8000)
13 Compressors.
8 EQ's
4 Platinumverbs
2 Silververbs
3 Delays.

It ran fine. No glitches that I could tell. The automation cues were just as I'd left em in the 9.2 / LAP 5.2 version.

So far, I'm tickled pink.

There are SOME issues remaining however: I've had this funky business with the cursor hotspot not being "right" even back in 9.2/LAP 5.0-5.2. That one's still there.

Does Apple/Emagic still have work to do? Oh yeah. I've got a wishlist a mile long for LAP (don't we all..)

I think the biggest hurt will be the lack of VST instruments and plugs. While Emagic has offered a library to make the port near painless, it's still going to be a bit before the rest of the 3rd party guys get up to speed. Until then I'm going to be missing some stuff. I'll make do. It's a pure joy to not have to boot back into OS9 just to do audio work for a change.
 
i'd have to agree that Linux probably isn't the solution for most people. there are some really nice apps available, and the linux audio community is a nice bunch of folks...however, it's still not easy to get up and running. be prepared to get your hands dirty searching for libraries you need, getting the most recent versions from source control, etc. it's a moving target and is best suited to very technical people at the moment. not to say it's not getting better because it is, but it's not very easy to use yet. here's an example: imagine you have a deadline, and you record some audio that you want to touch up in a sound editor. you find a strange bug that causes the editor to crash with your file. you send a bug report off to the developer. he replies back in 3 hours and says that he already fixed that bug, get the new release from source control. you do that, then find out that you also need to upgrade library X and Y also. you do that. you compile the new version of the editor and bingo - it works! great, but 4 hours have gone by. does this sound like something you'd be comfortable with? if so, then give linux audio a shot. most audio pros are not into this, from what i can tell. and most of them don't use USB anyway for reasons mentioned elsewhere on this thread ;-> that said, hopefully apple can fix some of these issues. someone also mentioned that Firewire audio also sucks under 10.2...i'd be more interested in the details on this.

cspace
 
Sharing.. =)

Originally posted by tjwett
Anyone WITHOUT a childish attitude care to share the details of their functional Logic X setup?

Dunno about the attitude (someone else can ascertain that), but here goes:

1) Box:
Any G4 will do, obviously faster can be better. Dual procs help under OS9, hugely more so under 10. Mine has both an AGP and PCI video card and I'm running dual 21" monitors.

2) Cards:
Just the video card and a Delta 1010

3) USB:
Cabled 1 main USB to the AMT8. The other goes to the Apple pro keyboard, which has the LAP dongle on on side and a Kensignton Turboball on the other. That's it. Nothing else on the USB bus. I'd had enough problems in video land (AE, Commotion, Electric Image) to learn the less crap on the USB bus the better. Hubs are just asking for problems.

4) OS Setup:

I always partition the drives. First the details, then the theory:

1) Mac OSX Partition. Clean install of 10.2 only. No OS9
2) Mac OS9 Partition for Classic (this is a 800mb parition). Clean install of 9.2.2 and nuked all the 3rd party USB driver crap (rio's palms, etc). Also nuke all printing crap and any other extranious crap. In short it's stripped to bone.
3) Mac OS Partition for LAP 5.x and other 9 only audio apps. This one has all the "junk" in it. OMS, etc.

Why go to this extreme?
Simple. This is the only brick wall means of ensuring reliability. If you use the same OS9 partition to boot into, as well as run under Classic, you're just asking for it. All the 3rd party crap the audio apps love to throw in all over hell's half acre are a disaster waiting to happen under classic. Now granted I don't run classic much at all, but in the rare occurance I need to I can do it without an hours worth of troubleshooting. For me it's all about time. I hate wasting time jacking around with why the box doesn't work because I'm too busy trying to force it to do something that it probably "should" do but won't. Screw that. I'll just go the safe route, and elminate as many variables as possible.

Logic install:

I booted 10.2 and first installed the Delta 1010 driver. Next I installed LAP 5.3. I then rebooted.

Logic Tweezes:

As I mentioned in another post, I'd had problems with the AMT8 initially. It turned out to be some sort of problem between the Delta 1010's midi driver and the LAP midi driver. I have no idea how I got it working, but it had something to do with noodling about in the enviroment layer. The sure fire fix (which I have to thank a buddy at Apple for) is to remove the Delta 1010's midi driver until they (Apple/Emagic/Midiman) figure out who did what wrong. Apparently either the LAP or the Midiman driver is not completely written to the CoreAudio specification. I'd expect there will be a fix shortly from one or the other once they nail it down. This isn't a biggie for me since I don't even use the midi port on the 1010 anyway.

So..

How to get LAP 5.3 and a Delta 1010 to play nice.
1) Install the Delta 1010 for OSX drivers (get from the Midiman site)
2) Go to Library/Core Audio/Midi Drivers
3) Get info on the "DeltaMidiDriver.plugin" folder. Change the owner from system to your user name.
4) Drag the DeltaMidiDriver.plugin folder out onto the desktop (or someplace else, just get it out of the library folder
5) Install LAP 5.3
6) Open the Audio Midi Setup (in the utils folder in Applications).
7) Click on the Midi tab. If you see a AMT8 or Unitor8 sitting there, you're home free. Done deal.
8) Launch LAP and crank away.

Environment Tweezes
I diddled my autoload a bit.
1) Open old 9.x Autoload. Saved in the 5.3 for X LAP folder.
2) Turn off any references to old VST plugs (won't crash or anything, but LAP will complain about them each time you launch until you do so.
3) Rearrange your screen sets to accomodate the dock then lock them back down. In my case I just had to resize my track window a bit.
4) Substitute any default VST plugs with the closest LAP native equiv.
5) Save.

That's all I did. The whole shebang took about 15 minutes. That certainly beats the hours somebody else posted about compiling and futzing around for hours just to keep current. Yeesh. I'd rather be making bad music.
=)

Hope that helps.
 
lewnworx,
yes that is helpful. thanks. i run a very minimal extension set also. it's very important for OS 9 but what about for X? we don't have an extension manager anymore. i thought about creating a separate Login User id for audio and removing all unwanted apps/files for that user but would that really help? i think that the real tweaks are buried deep in the System and i'm not keen on messing around with that. how do we make the equivilent of a stripped down extension set with OS X? and is it still necessary?
 
Originally posted by tjwett
what about for X? we don't have an extension manager anymore.
Here I was referring to when you boot 9 via Classic under X. It's still just as important, which is why I have a "classic use only" OS9 install.
Originally posted by tjwett
i thought about creating a separate Login User id for audio and removing all unwanted apps/files for that user but would that really help? i think that the real tweaks are buried deep in the System and i'm not keen on messing around with that.
AAAAAK. Don't go there. It isn't as simple as just removing apps for that user, and besides it wouldn't help. (BTW, if you were, you'd be removing them for all users, since they're shared. Under X, only the contents of the "home" folder (i.e. the stuff in the user's account name folder in users) is specific to a given user.

You really don't need a per user "extension" setup under X. 98% of what you'd want to disable are really background process apps, which you can access under login items and turn off what you don't need. In reality, in very few cases do you actually run into something where you have to. X by and large is ludicrously stable, so the init/extension conflicts of old are really not part of the equation. Drivers, on the other hand, can be, as I saw yesterday with LAP 5.3. In this case it can be a bit nastier, in that you have to know where they are on the drive to disable them by removing, but with any luck the Audio folks will figure it out pretty quickly and get updaters in place to cure these ills.

I'd subscribe to the Yahoo EMagic users lists, since this is really the best source for all things Logic related, and the most reliable, since Michael Haydn and other EMagic staff post there regularly.
 
Originally posted by tjwett
What I meant was that it's unusable for ME.
Great. You could have said that then!

(boring sarcastic comments snipped)

Anyone WITHOUT a childish attitude care to share the details of their functional Logic X setup?
Well, that probably rules me out (feel free to ignore this post tjwett), but hey, I'll post some useful stuff from me anyway (Cut and pasted from elsewhere).

Platform : New Mirrored Drive door dual 867
OS : 10.2
Other hardware : Audiowerk 8, Apple Narrow SCSI card

System setup : The drive has a 10G OS+Apps partition and a 50G storage partition and a second drive for audio and samples. The OS9 + OSX are both on the one partition as Apple recommend that you do not split the two onto seperate partitions - I believe this is because in some instances Classic mode can be get into confused states if 9 & X are split. Its a vanilla insall, with various apps as well. (Spark, Office, Fetch, ie etc)

Install was easy : 5.3.0 is a standalone installer and installs into the Applications dir. All I needed to do was authorise the XSKey, and make a new alias to my EXS24 instruments dir.

Hardware :
My Audiowerk 8 is unsupported under X so only tested using the Core Audio built in output. Am pleasently surprised that the response and noise floor on the built in output is not bad at all. (noted in the manual that its now 24bit output) Also Surprised that it works with audio instruments with no obvious latency. My midisport 2x2 (only connects an MPC, Virus and K4) also worked instantly on installing the new beta drivers for 10.2.

Tests :
I've only tested with a couple of tracks so far (approx 14 stereo tracks, built in logic plugins, 5 EXS24s and an ESM) and it seems to work fine with no glitching. What is great is that the interface stays snappy (Quartz Extreme at work?) But I'm not sure yet how well the Dual CPU support works better in OSX. In theory it should be way better BUT... Note that also you still get 'locked out' by the wristwatch doing certain things - for example refreshing a big list of EXS24 instruments. Of course the other track that used some VST plugs in '9 got a bit confused as theyre not availiable from X (yet!)

Tweaks :
Unlike OS9 where turning of VM, reassigning mem allocation and hacking extension sets, theres nothing analogous under X. You could hack vaarious bsd init files but generally thats more likely to cause you problems than optimise the system for audio. The only thing I did was make sure that things like IM and email clients are closed (their polling can interrupt CPU, and sound alerts are a pain) and check that daemons like ftp and web servin were disabled but thats more paranoia than really likely to produce a tangible benefit.

Conclusion :
Well it seems to work ok at first glance, but then again only more usage will show up problems (like the automation curve tool disappearing in gold 5!) the biggest problem appears to be lack of many, or mature drivers for hardware under X. going by experience it will be a while before drivers are mature - unlike the app which is a portng job, most drivers will have to be mostly re-written from scratch so it will take time for bugs to be ironed out. Likewise, most 3rd party plugs have not been ported to OSX yet which will cause many to stay in OS9 for a while. But it looks like a good start.

Notes since the above was written :
- According to emagic, the performance under osx should be the SAME as in os9. I believe this is due to the fact that the audio engine has not ben re-written to take advantage of threading under dual processors in OSX, but this hasnt been confirmed as the reason.
- Logic control is fully supported under Logic X.
- To import preferences from OS9 simply move file "/System Folder/Preferences/Logic 5 Preferences" to folder "/Users/YourUserName/Library/Preferences" and
rename it to "info.emagic.logic"
- Serial MIDI drivers are *not* availiable (or likely to be for a while)

Theres more interesting discussions in the LUG about this all - a more suitable place for it really (lenworx is already posting there I notice)

~Pev
 
I think the company has gone mad... just read NO VST no other
formats ONLY core audio... oops

Our way only please - emagic's new mantra...

what the hell do they think their doing?

I've always used logic for their willingness to let other formats
and plugins exist inside...

Now logic 5.3 is only osx, so now I (we) have to stick on 5.2 for
another year while the other companies decide if they even want
to make their plugins core audio apple branded

They had better develop as os9 version AT THE SAME TIME and
not leave it behind and only concentrate on osx - the industry is
not ready let alone the end user

-Mike Droste
WindyTown.com
 
I think the company has gone mad... just read NO VST no other

Anytime you have an over proliferation of formats ie VST, MAS, RTAS, Audiosuite etc you have conflicts.

Audio Units are an attempt to expand the plugin market for Apple and Logic without the maddening amount of different formats and plugins. Stability should improve.

i've emailed no less than 6 companies and have heard that Audio Units will be coming for two of the companies. If Emagic is correct in stating that porting VST to Audio Unit is simple using their Library tool then I don't see this as much of an issue.

Developers will love that they can now sell Audio Units to work with ANY Core Audio app. Methinks All of Apple's apps that deal with Audio will seen be CoreAudio at their core. This increase the potential market for any developer selling plugins on the Mac.

VST's won't be going away. If MOTU decides to support them fine but the flexibility of Audio Units is going to be tough to beat
 
Surely once max & msp come out for OS X someone could make a Carbon VST Wrapper for audioUnits and then everyone will be happy.

From reading about OS X in the early days I think something like this would be possible with project builder aswell, I remember a review of OS X in Sound on Sound last year where a guy threw together some kind of software synth just using audioUnits and project builder.

I know it's still a waiting game but I'm hoping things will happen very quickly now all the other companies have got some actually competition under OS X now. The library emagic are supplying for other developers to use should also speed things along.
 
Front what I can tell, apparently none. No offense, but you sound like every other "Linux is the only answer to everything" type I've ran into. The problem here is simple: There aren't any truly pro quality audio (or video or 3D for that matter) apps for Linux. Why? Because there's no money in it. So few people run Linux as a primary operating system that you make the Mac users look like the overwhelming majority in comparison. Companies can't afford to dedicate dozens of man years to a product that will only sell to a miniscule % of the population (and I'm not talking about Macs here, Logic has a couple hundred thousand installed copies). Any product with the development scope of a multitracking / sequencing / plugin supporting type like Logic, Pro Tools, CuBase or Digital Performer is a multi million dollar development process. You don't pour millions into something that if you're lucky you might get a 50-100K return on. It's suicide. Sorry to break any bubbles here, but that is fiscal reality.
Point 1: Why the hostility? If you would read my posts rather than jump to conclusions, you'll see that I've spent a lot of time attempting to get OS X to work properly with audio apps. You'll also see that I went as far as shelling out another $69 for Jaguar (only ten weeks after I spent $69 on OS 10.1). So I would say that hardly qualifies me as a "Linux is the answer to everything type". I have not invested in 5 differernet Macs and attendant software and OS X (twice!) in order to demonstrate my unfettered loyalty to Linux. My experiments using Linux are, as of now, just that - experiments that are well worth doing. I wanted to see if it worked or not. As for my running this experiment on a decidedly amateur imac G3, well, excuse for me for not tearing down the studio setup for a trial Linux experiment.

Point 2: Of course I agree with you on the limitations of USB audio. However ... whatever you think of USB audio devices - and I use them at home, not in the studio, if that pleases you to know - , if they work properly under OS 9.2 and Linux on the same damn machine, then it isn't all that unreasonable to expect them to perform in a similar fashion (that is, to function, period) with OS X. Is that so hard to understand? I think not. It is inescapably obvious that the problem is OS X and OS X only - NOT the USB device or the Mac hardware. The point is, if you own USB devices (and I do find them useful for shifting around location film sound recorded on DAT, as a USB interface - by your own calculations, even - has more than adequate bandwidth to handle a stereo 48 Khz signal; and if lowly, old school 48 Khz DAT does not fit your "pro" criterion, well, that is your problem and not mine.), you should quite naturally expect them to work as well on OS X as they did on 9.2.

Point 3: So you are a software designer. Unfortunately, you sound like one, i.e. - more concerned with myriad tech specs, its alleged "status" and how many millions of $$$ worth of R&D went into it. I am not a software designer and I couldn't care less about such extraneous details, particularly when it has nothing to do with the topic under discussion. I'm sorry, but "professional" is a relative concept. You are the one in possession of a "professional" fetish, not me. I, for one, wouldn't touch Cubase ever again with a ten foot pole, regardless of how many times the Steinberg product literature cares to tout its alleged "pro" status. And I don't care how many millions of dollars Steinberg may have poured into Cubase; that doesn't alter the fact that it is a clumsy piece of software with a nightmarish interface which simply screams that it was designed by a computer geek and certainly not a musician or audio engineer. At least that is my (and many others') opinion. Sorry to burst YOUR bubble, but I have worked on videos which were edited solely on a cheap imac (when our G4 network crashed), and the end result was what counted. People comment on the content; they don't speculate on or care how expensive the production equipment was.

Point 4: I do not do this work with an eye towards where the machinery and software rank in a popularity contest. I do not obsess over how many others are using Apple or Linux - or Windows, for that matter. Despite what you imply, there are some Linux apps available which do a more than adequate job at multitracking, audio editing and (yes) video editing. Are they as slick-looking and evolved as Logic or FCP? No. Will they run your favorite VST plugins? No. (But I don't use any VST plugins anyway, so it's not an issue to me. If this is an issue to you, then avoid Linux.) And if they just so happen to meet all of someone's particular needs, then why do you have a problem with that? As I've said before, I am experimenting with it. It may or may not turn out to cover all of my needs, and that is precisely what I am attempting to find out. It's either that or sit here listening to the pops and clicks emanating from OS X.

You are not breaking anyone's bubble here, except perhaps your own. Please stop projecting your techno-fetishes, your concerns with the vicissitudes of software market economics, and "professional" neuroses onto the people on this thread who are merely trying to get our audio setups to run properly under OS X, and feel compelled to look into alternatives which will work, should we not be able to get OS X to function as it should.
 
All Gone...

All gone in Logic 5.3 from my setup

Auto-Tune 3 VST M/M
Auto-Tune 3 VST S/S
FM7
FM7 FX
NorthPole
PROSONIQ Orange Vocoder 1
PSP_VintageWarmer
PSPVintageWarmer files
Waldorf
WaveShell-VST 3.5

Now what...

Emagic has to make a dual os9 and osx development UNTIL ALL companies have come onboard
 
Deck 3.5

Has any one herven tried OSX's first DAW Multi-track and what do myou think?
Is it further along than Logic?
Iknow it has limited midi.
But the trial seems to give good audio with the iMac
I am a logic user from the atari st days which i still have
I am also a cubae user from 3.0 to present and love thier dsp factory support
as i dont have to use software plugins as much.
My favorite though is DP3
I just need/want Yamaha dspfactory ds2416 support as it really takes the hit off the cpu.
 
Originally posted by Pepzhez
Point 1: Why the hostility? If you would read my posts rather than jump to conclusions, you'll see that I've spent a lot of time attempting to get OS X to work properly with audio apps.
And if you'd read mine, you'd have seen that I spent a fair bit of time explaining factually rather than emotionally what I had found to work. If you've ever seen my posts on the Logic Users forum, you'd see that I take the time to share my findings and solutions for problems rather than screaming about what's not working. The hostility was perception on your part, I was laughing on my end. I found it utterly amusing that you went on a major rant within the first day of a product's launch.
You'll also see that I went as far as shelling out another $69 for Jaguar (only ten weeks after I spent $69 on OS 10.1). So I would say that hardly qualifies me as a "Linux is the answer to everything type". I have not invested in 5 differernet Macs and attendant software and OS X (twice!) in order to demonstrate my unfettered loyalty to Linux.
If dropping $120 for an OS is cause for concern, you should be charging more for your work. You seemed to be fairly fixated on the fact that Apple charged for the OS upgrade. Are they supposed to do this for free? That was my point.
As for my running this experiment on a decidedly amateur imac G3, well, excuse for me for not tearing down the studio setup for a trial Linux experiment.
Point taken. Based on the rest of what I'd read, it appeared as though the iMac was your primary machine. A large number of heavy ranters often don't have even close to the right tools for the job, and when they fail, they blame the inadequate tools, rather then the poor judgement for not getting the right tools in the first place. Kudo's for having the sense to not tear apart a working rig. Many people don't.
If they work properly under OS 9.2 and Linux on the same damn machine, then it isn't all that unreasonable to expect them to perform in a similar fashion (that is, to function, period) with OS X. Is that so hard to understand? I think not.
Nope, not hard to understand at all. What's hard to understand is why you're setting yourself up to rage away at Apple. Did they make the non functioning USB widget? I'd bet the driver itself is probably not written to spec or 100% up to snuff for any number of reasons. Over the years I've learned a couple things:

1) Don't trust a dot zero release of anything. It's inherently going to have bugs.

2) Attempting to put a dot zero release into full on production on day one is just asking for it. That's the reason point releases exist. In a perfect world, everything would work like a champ on initial release. Unfortunately it's not, and it's physically impossible to test every combination of hardware and software out there. To expect it to perform flawlessly is really setting yourself up for failure. It's a lot safer to plan around it not working right and if it DOES work right it's all gravy. Just because the widget's 9.x driver worked correctly doesn't ensure it's 10x will.

3) More often than not, it's the product item in question's fault, not the OS. I've found this to be true with my own stuff. Once in a blue moon I'll catch something that truly is the OS's fault, but it's not very often. Usually it's do to not reading some minute bit of documentation on the OS's API's or something I've done. In this case I'd bet it's probably developer unfamiliarity with writing drivers for Core Audio. It's new stuff. It's probably not easy stuff. And because it's new it's going to take developers a bit to get the hang of it. It isn't fair to blanket Apple with all the blame for a 3rd party product not working, and by the same token you may want to cut the 3rd party guys a bit of slack as well. This is new for everybody involved. There is going to be some learning curve on all fronts.

My point here is that it would be far more productive to note that yeah, the stuff isn't working as it should, and report it to the parties involved than to rant about how OSX is a useless platform. I just had an issue with the absolute proclamation that it was utterly worthless. Unusable in some hardware and software combinations in it's present state, perhaps, but I found your statement to be a bid broad in scope.

So you are a software designer. Unfortunately, you sound like one, i.e. - more concerned with myriad tech specs, its alleged "status" and how many millions of $$$ worth of R&D went into it.


My point was that you stand a far better chance of getting usable SW when somebody has poured some real investment into it than some poor guy hacking away at it in a basement somewhere in his spare time. Not that I disdain the open source community at all. It's a noble cause, and I've even done my bit for it. I just wouldn't count on it for my bread and butter. How do you explain to your client you couldn't deliver because you put your trust in some guy in a basement that you have no commitment from of any kind? They aren't going to take that too well, and may even consider your judgement as dangerous.
I, for one, wouldn't touch Cubase ever again with a ten foot pole, regardless of how many times the Steinberg product literature cares to tout its alleged "pro" status. And I don't care how many millions of dollars Steinberg may have poured into Cubase; that doesn't alter the fact that it is a clumsy piece of software with a nightmarish interface which simply screams that it was designed by a computer geek and certainly not a musician or audio engineer. At least that is my (and many others') opinion.
Point well taken. As far as Cubase is concerned, I share the opinion completely. I didn't care to add fuel to the fire and get 5000 flames from Cubase lovers. I have friends whose band have managed to put out several quite successful albums with Cubase. It works for them. That doesn't mean I'd use it for any of my work.
Point 4: I do not do this work with an eye towards where the machinery and software rank in a popularity contest.
Nor do I. If I did I'd be running Cubase under Windows 98, or even worse I'd have dropped $50K on ProTools when it's completely overkill for my needs.
=)
And if they just so happen to meet all of someone's particular needs, then why do you have a problem with that?
I don't. I just have a problem with declaring OSX unusable because one particular combination of (admittedly) low end non pro hardware didn't work for you. If I were to show up on a video shoot with a $300 Magnavox camcorder as my front line rig expecting to shoot airable footage with it, any sane person with any amount of time in the field would be right to look at me sideways.
You are not breaking anyone's bubble here... FLAME SNIPPED ... trying to get our audio setups to run properly under OS X, and feel compelled to look into alternatives which will work, should we not be able to get OS X to function as it should.
No argument about trying to get it to work. No argument about looking into alternatives. I just think that expecting everything to work perfectly within a day of release [LAP] of an app, and a couple weeks of a major release of the OS [10.2] was way out there. Apple never proclaimed 10.0-10.1.x as a major audio platform. It wasn't until 10.2 that they made noise about addressing audio. I've been editing, mixing and working all day in LAP 5.3 under 10.2 without any hiccups outside of the midi thing I previously posted (as well as my fix for the problem).
 
Ah, truce, lewnworx! I do think we are on the same side on this issue, aren't we? Your advice on getting things to work in OS X is something I will try. And I really hope I can get it to work.

I still think that Apple is not entirely blameless here; you are letting them off too easily. I've been promised time and time again by Apple tech support that "the next upgrade will fix everything". 10.1.3 was supposed to cure all ills, then 10.1.5, then Jaguar, then ... who knows? At least be honest and admit that these upgrades may be somewhat farther down the line than we'd all like. It's the runaround I've been getting from Apple that ticks me off more than anything else.

I'm still convinced that OS X is the culprit when it comes to USB devices. And I really don't understand why Apple can't get this to work right when all runs smoothly under OS 9. Again, I'm not a programmer, but USB-related issues don't seem to be all that complex in the general scheme of things. Perhaps I am wrong, though.

I'm certain that it will all be straightened out eventually, but meanwhile it sure is frustrating.
 
Originally posted by Pepzhez
I'm still convinced that OS X is the culprit when it comes to USB devices. And I really don't understand why Apple can't get this to work right when all runs smoothly under OS 9. Again, I'm not a programmer, but USB-related issues don't seem to be all that complex in the general scheme of things.

Trust me, writing USB driver code is *not* easy!

~Pev
 
Originally posted by DrGruv1


They had better develop as os9 version AT THE SAME TIME and
not leave it behind and only concentrate on osx - the industry is
not ready let alone the end user


mmm..Who are 'they'? If an app is mature in OS 9 its mature, its there. Use OS 9. If it ain't cutting the mustard in 9, find something else. If 'they' is emagic, existing OS 9 bugs are not about to be addressed.

Maybe you are talking about VST instruments, or the world of various plug-ins out there.

The worst thing that could happen would be that Steinbergs and Digidesigns and others with a lot of invested code in plug ins etc for classic audio apps, will not feel that it is worth the effort to port to carbon or cocoa, to OS X plug ins etc, for the Mac because they believe eMagic Logic is somehow going to lock them out of the market. I think that is one of the last things eMagic wants... at least their release statement seems to be friendly to the idea of helping old plug in architectures port to OS X core audio, although it could be read as unfriendly.
 
well now that we are all playing nice again i have a question. is there a safe way to remove unwanted USB drivers from OS 10.2? i know there are metric shi+load of them in there and i want to see if they are causing conflicts. is this possible or even necessary?
 
bottom line is that in OS 9 my audio setup works (including my crap usb imic) with some instability in OS.

when i port to OS X things do not work with my audio setup with stability in the OS.
 
Originally posted by twelve
bottom line is that in OS 9 my audio setup works (including my crap usb imic) with some instability in OS.

when i port to OS X things do not work with my audio setup with stability in the OS.

hey, is this twelve from the Ableton board? cheers!
 
Originally posted by pev


Trust me, writing USB driver code is *not* easy!

~Pev

If it were, it would not be one of the primary sources of conflicts since its introduction.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.