Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
WOW! Thank you everyone, my mind is now numb. LOL.

Kudos to the community for making the issues known, but I take away a few points for some not implementing something even close to the scientific method in drawing conclusions or theories.

I can certainly understand the mind-set however - welcome to the world of Windows! Over the years the main solution to compensate for bloated and inefficient code, larger programs that need more resources, etc etc was to throw more hardware at it causing the vicious circle.

This is certainly justified to a degree, but it's not always the best solution. I'm glad to see this hasn't gone unnoticed in the messages here. There are so many variable involved, narrowing them down and creating benchmarks can be a painstaking process - after all, we do want to compare apples to apples as much as possible.

It's only the 1st gen iPad with many software updates to come, and eventually 2nd gen which may or may not include more RAM - after all, it took the iPhone to the 3GS before this - at which time I believe tweaks and enhancements reached their limits to provide the performance required to run the OS as well as more sophisticated apps.

Where does Force Quit fit into this - can you do it on the iPad?

You can force quit, but the lack of ram doesn't slow down the iPad in any way, but rather cause a bit of inconvenience. No slowdowns like on PCs, thankfully.

Also, restarting definitely made a big difference. Still not perfect the way it appears to be on Apple's guided tour, but not nearly as bad as before.
 
Read This...

I have found this surfing the web:

"Kind Bytes Megabytes
Physical (HW_PHYSMEM) 258,998,272 247 MB
User (HW_USERMEM) 210,284,544 200.5 MB​
Again, it’s likely that the device is using 256 MB memory chips with a portion of the total being used for other purposes, such as video memory. Also, developers have noted that all of the 200 MB of user memory is not available for use by apps. The OS and background apps make use of a large portion of that memory."


Source: http://9to5mac.com/ipad-256mb-ram-single-core-processor-4493093592

Does this means that iPad has more of the 256mb for all the system, leaving this amount to user apps ? :confused:
 
Apple is always cheap at memory, look at their top of line laptop 17" MBP only has 4G memory, it has $2500 price tag, for god sake, and you have to pay $600 for upgrading to 8G, it's just a joke.

Talk about ipad, 256Mb is just fine for iphoneOS 3.2. If OS 4.0 does bring multi-tasking, 512M is at least, that's how they get you buy a new ipad 2.0
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.