Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

archi penko

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 6, 2007
168
210
I’m about to
771747B4-CCA6-48E4-93E7-B02FA787FE32.jpeg


for these new MBPs…

For the new M1 MAX Chip, why would one use 64GB RAM over 32 GB of RAM?

What are you specifically using it for?
What applications if any specifically you found 64GB helps/is really needed?
Any thoughts on having that amount of RAM?
 
Last edited:

mlykke

macrumors regular
Aug 16, 2020
168
168
Same reason as for any other computer - You choose 64 GB of you have the need for it. Either very demanding applications or multi-tasking with a lot of applications open at the same time. The M1 doesn't make a difference - It's basic computing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ian87w and Basic75

adamjackson

macrumors 68020
Jul 9, 2008
2,336
4,734
My Core i9 iMac has 64GB of RAM. I occasionally am glad to have it but it's so rare that I would probably do 32GB if I order a new Mac today and instead opt for a 4TB SSD. I need storage, I less-so need RAM.

Now, like as said above, if the 64GB has more memory bandwidth, I'd consider it.
 

archi penko

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 6, 2007
168
210
I've got 64GB on my 2019 16", so I'm getting 64GB on the M1 MAX since I routinely max it out (I do game dev). So, just depends on your usage.
that sounds awesome. what sort of games do you dev for / apps you use?
 

archi penko

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 6, 2007
168
210
My Core i9 iMac has 64GB of RAM. I occasionally am glad to have it but it's so rare that I would probably do 32GB if I order a new Mac today and instead opt for a 4TB SSD. I need storage, I less-so need RAM.

Now, like as said above, if the 64GB has more memory bandwidth, I'd consider it.
what do you use it for?
 

Big Bad D

macrumors 6502a
Jan 3, 2007
526
560
France
I've got 64GB on my 2019 16", so I'm getting 64GB on the M1 MAX since I routinely max it out (I do game dev). So, just depends on your usage.
Processor access is not same for intel and new Silicon. Agree more memory ican be better but it’s not necessarily the same.
 

mlykke

macrumors regular
Aug 16, 2020
168
168
Processor access is not same for intel and new Silicon. Agree more memory ican be better but it’s not necessarily the same.
Please stop with these claims. It's been incorrect since day one and it's still incorrect. It's not about access, its about how much space data takes up in memory. 1 GB is 1 GB, whether the architecture is Intel, Arm or something different. While there can be smaller differences between how efficient certain architectures are in loading, compressing and offloading memory - A certain amount of data takes up the same amount of space.
 

frutiger75

macrumors newbie
Oct 18, 2021
3
3
should i get a 64 w/ an M1 MAX or stick w/ 32? is 64 overkill if i don't game? i use logic mainly, among other things...
 

Cybertruck20

macrumors member
Jun 21, 2017
76
119
Los Angeles, CA
I didn't even think twice and went 64 GB. I do heavy video, motion graphics and 3D work between different applications and always have way too many things open at once so the headroom is nice to have, especially with After Effects eating up 75% of it constantly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BWhaler

archi penko

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 6, 2007
168
210
I didn't even think twice and went 64 GB. I do heavy video, motion graphics and 3D work between different applications and always have way too many things open at once so the headroom is nice to have, especially with After Effects eating up 75% of it constantly.
Do you think the adobe apps are just not optimised for Apple silicon, or is it just how apps like After Effects run? they generally a lot of RAM?
 

Delarock

macrumors regular
Dec 25, 2016
176
88
Iam regular user with 1 VM (windows running medical software - not heavy usage), watching videos etc. Iam just thinking if 32 gb 64 gb. But i think that 32 gigs will be sufficient lot years with my kind of usage
 

dead flag blues

macrumors regular
May 13, 2011
138
78
I was using 64gb for polygonal stuff in Rhino/Grasshopper in my late 2019 16" MBP. Huge datasets. I've since moved that work to an MSI laptop. I'll order a new M1 or M1X 16" MBP in the next few days. I will go with 32gb on this one, as the most I'll do on this machine is Photoshop and Illustrator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndStreet

Marshall73

macrumors 68030
Apr 20, 2015
2,699
2,824
Iam using it for few months, absolutely no problem with M1 macbook pro 13 , our imaging and inform. system work flawlessly ( faster than our hospital PC)
Windows XP? Because x86/64 windows 7 and 10 run like dogs, massive lag and no proper video emulation.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: ajfahey

Goldfire

macrumors regular
Oct 29, 2009
141
115
Oklahoma City
You must be pretty jazzed about this machine — as a game dev, what excites you the most?
This 2019 16" is pretty capable, but it struggles quite a bit with anything from level design to just re-compiling code. Just the speed boost alone is going to stop me from tearing my hair out most days. Having the ability to test the game at 120hz is going to be pretty great as well since that is becoming more and more expected by gamers these days.

Even more exciting is I'll actually be able to record gameplay footage that isn't super laggy, which doesn't exactly give a good look when sharing on social media, etc.
 

aacemyan

macrumors regular
Nov 20, 2017
135
206
TX
Don't forget that the 32 or 64gb is unified memory, so it's a single pool of RAM that gets used for both CPU and GPU. If an app/game uses 12gb of RAM, then the rest of the system would hypothetically have 20gb left for everything else. Even though it's total overkill, my last iMac from 2012 had 32gb or ram, so almost 10 years later I figured I should get something with more ram as a means of future proofing. It's not often that such a radical change in laptop comes around...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.