Love my MBA 16GB 1TB, I'm sure I could've got away with just having 8GB for my use case right now but I intend to keep this computer for a good few years so I thought best to future proof.
I went straightly for it when I placed the order. It was 1362 euros including vat (taxes) and shipping but it is the fastest machine my hands have touched so far, even with not optimized programs. This allows greater productivity and most tasks are a pleasure to accomplish. Just as an example, on windows I used a software that took 6 minutes to launch. Here it takes 35 seconds and it is not even optimized for M1!I bought my 8/7 256 8GB Air soon after launch. There weren’t any deep looks into how it behaved with Adobe Creative Cloud. Open Illustrator, inDesign and Photoshop and you’re done.
I also found myself constantly watching activity monitor, that itself made me return (after 6 months, thanks to the extended COVID returns policy).
A 6 month review led me to order an 8/8 512 16GB Air.
I have a base model M1 MacBook Air (so, 7 GPU core variant of M1, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD). It's not my primary Mac and it isn't going to be my primary M1 Mac either. The whole reason I have it is for beta testing new macOS releases in the summertime and doing other such testing during the rest of the year. It will never be used for even mild content creation, and will, at the very most, be used for mild content consumption. For my purposes, 8GB of RAM is totally fine.I have always been a believer in never going light on RAM in a computer. So far my 8gb in the MBA seems like it is enough. But I keep thinking long term would I have been better off with 16?
I have been building PC's since the early 80's and this new architecture is just different. From everything published so far, for normal usage (even fairly high end usage) 8Gb seems to be more than enough For my own use case, as a secondary machine (iMac being primary) the 8Gb will do just fine.I have a base model M1 MacBook Air (so, 7 GPU core variant of M1, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD). It's not my primary Mac and it isn't going to be my primary M1 Mac either. The whole reason I have it is for beta testing new macOS releases in the summertime and doing other such testing during the rest of the year. It will never be used for even mild content creation, and will, at the very most, be used for mild content consumption. For my purposes, 8GB of RAM is totally fine.
However, if it were my sole Mac or my primary Mac (let alone my primary M1 Mac) or even a Mac of importance, I'd get 16GB, if for no other reason than future-proofing and overhead in case you ever take up a workflow that benefits from it. People erroneously like to comment about how RAM is entirely different with Apple Silicon and how you don't need more RAM and that's simply not true. RAM is much more efficient with Apple Silicon, but that doesn't necessarily negate the need to page more than 8GB of data at a given time.
I'm not saying it won't. Just that I'd opt for 16GB. Apple HAS cut off Apple Silicon iOS/iPadOS devices for not having enough RAM before. There's no guarantee that they won't do it with the Mac. That and you can't later decide on more RAM without chucking out the whole computer.I have been building PC's since the early 80's and this new architecture is just different. From everything published so far, for normal usage (even fairly high end usage) 8Gb seems to be more than enough For my own use case, as a secondary machine (iMac being primary) the 8Gb will do just fine.
I have to agree with this. I guess for my use case as a secondary machine with light use (normally) and occasional heavy load the 8/256 has been stellar and I don't see upgrading. Soon I will upgrade my main desktop to a Mx machine since the i9 already looks like it is out classed by the M1.I'm not saying it won't. Just that I'd opt for 16GB. Apple HAS cut off Apple Silicon iOS/iPadOS devices for not having enough RAM before. There's no guarantee that they won't do it with the Mac. That and you can't later decide on more RAM without chucking out the whole computer.
Also, the architecture is different when it comes to how data in RAM is accessed by system components (CPU, GPU, etc.) and how much of it needs to be duplicated to other places to be accessible elsewhere. That helps a little bit. But that doesn't do anything for when you're loading large files or have a lot of things running at once. That still requires RAM in numbers. RAM is still RAM.
Again, I own that same base model. It's perfectly adequate for my uses. But my uses are not hefty and it's not a Mac I'm serious about for the long term outside of my testing purposes. If it was to be my primary Mac, I'd want to max the RAM out because I know that later on, I'll want to and I won't have the ability to. But few people look at the long term when buying something in the here and now. I've been bitten by that and I've seen enough people bitten by that to the point where I refuse to if this is to be a serious machine for me (which this base model M1 MacBook Air is not).I have to agree with this. I guess for my use case as a secondary machine with light use (normally) and occasional heavy load the 8/256 has been stellar and I don't see upgrading. Soon I will upgrade my main desktop to a Mx machine since the i9 already looks like it is out classed by the M1.
I'm not saying it won't. Just that I'd opt for 16GB. Apple HAS cut off Apple Silicon iOS/iPadOS devices for not having enough RAM before. There's no guarantee that they won't do it with the Mac. That and you can't later decide on more RAM without chucking out the whole computer.
Also, the architecture is different when it comes to how data in RAM is accessed by system components (CPU, GPU, etc.) and how much of it needs to be duplicated to other places to be accessible elsewhere. That helps a little bit. But that doesn't do anything for when you're loading large files or have a lot of things running at once. That still requires RAM in numbers. RAM is still RAM.
Get the 512 GB because in any case a certain percentage of the ssd needs to be left free. I could be wrong cause I don't remember well the exact value but should grossly be 1/3 of the overall capacity.Should I get 256/512 ? Considering i'm a light to moderate user of my computer.
What do you do, and how much storage do you have on your current system?Should I get 256/512 ? Considering i'm a light to moderate user of my computer.
What do you do, and how much storage do you have on your current system?
Raw photos eat a lot of space I would go with the 512GB drive.Web browsing, light photo editing/ video editing. I realized if I ditched the RAW photo files on my current laptop, I would have 100GB free space, even with Xcode installed, yes I also do some light coding.
Get at least one capacity size larger than you think you'll need. You cannot upgrade the storage on an M1 Mac after purchase. Same advice generally goes for T2 Macs (with the exception of the 2019 Mac Pro).Should I get 256/512 ? Considering i'm a light to moderate user of my computer.
That nagging question is the main reason I went with 16GB, knowing I would essentially use it as it as a glorified Chromebook. (More accurately, a Safaribook). I've had two MacBook Pros with 8GB before and never had issues, but I always felt I should've just spent the extra coin for the RAM. Completely overkill, but I have zero worries that I made the right decision and enjoy every minute of using it.I have always been a believer in never going light on RAM in a computer. So far my 8gb in the MBA seems like it is enough. But I keep thinking long term would I have been better off with 16?
What did you end up doing? I keep waffling.I'm in the same position. I'm a light user, but it is not uncommon for me to have 20+ safari tabs open while performing other light usage tasks. To further complicate matters, I plan on keeping this purchase for about five years. I keep going back and forth between 8GB and 16GB of RAM. I know it is only a matter of $200 but I am having difficulty figuring out which way to go.
Nope, all good here.I have always been a believer in never going light on RAM in a computer. So far my 8gb in the MBA seems like it is enough. But I keep thinking long term would I have been better off with 16?
There plenty of Youtube videos when it comes to Macs: usually 2-3 years newer Macs with 8GB destroy older ones with 16GB in every task.I'm still torn. I've used both the 8gb and the 16gb. My ONLY reason for being interested in the 16gb is the RAM needed ni 4-5 years on new OS's. I'm concerned that Apple will basically up the required RAM by then.