That's a pretty narrow definition; my work is massive excel spreadsheets running across a couple screens for hours per day, which is just as much work as Final Cut Pro. A Mini would do fine.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Mac Mini vs. Mac Studio Buyer's Guide: 20+ Differences Compared
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
That's a pretty narrow definition; my work is massive excel spreadsheets running across a couple screens for hours per day, which is just as much work as Final Cut Pro. A Mini would do fine.
Never going to happen
That's even more of a niche (way more) than the iPhone Mini fans (of which I am)
I don’t understand those who say that there’s a big gap in pricing between the Mini and the Studio. If you want the specs of a Studio, pricing is pretty similar. I just configured the Mini that would fit my needs, and it’s 2600€ (and it’s not the top confuguration). So it clearly overlaps with Studio prices. I want a M4 Studio, but after the announcement yesterday, I thought I could consider a ~3000€ Mini instead. However, I prefer the Studio form factor more. The USB-A ports and the SD card slot, if they keep them in the next Studio, would also be a very welcome bonus compared to the Mini.
I’m actually going to upgrade mine to an M4 mini with 24GB of RAM. Mine has been showing its age, even before Seqouia came out. My i7 is paired with an RX 570 and 32GB of RAM, I think this will be a good upgrade. Still debating on 512GB vs 1TB since I have three hard drives plugged into my mini currently.
It's really easy.
Can your workflow take advantage of the GPU:
No - Mac Mini
Yes - Mac Studio
Do you need lots of RAM:
No - Mac Mini
Yes - Mac Studio, Mac Pro
Are you a professional - Mac Pro
what do you mean by professional?
plenty of professional work has no need for the pcie slots in the Mac Pro
you only need a Mac Pro if you have something to stick in the pcie
otherwise it's pointless
The first 521 are more than a year old.
I just made quick comparison of similar configuration that are closer together.
Mac mini Pro 14/20 cores 48/512/10Gb ethernet 2099,-
Mac studio base 12/30 cores 32/512/10 Gb ethernet 1999,-
It will be interesting to see real life comparison of such congigs.
Now watch the thread get closed by the mods for "necro boosting" even though it was a mod who did it.
Yes it does. Local LLM work for example. Large data / video imports exports to externals. Studio still has 400 vs 273 bandwidth and up 196GB RAM. It's just the mini overlaps the studio with workflows that don't require more than 64GB memory.
I bought a M2 Max Mac Studio last year and did have a debate on whether to get a Mac Mini or Mac Studio.
At the end of the day I went for the Studio because when you spec up the Mac Mini it is basically the same price as the Max version Studio.
I assume the same will be true next year when an M4 Max Studio is released.
At the end of the day I went for the Studio because when you spec up the Mac Mini it is basically the same price as the Max version Studio.
I assume the same will be true next year when an M4 Max Studio is released.
Still, at that point you wait a few months for the M4 Studio Max.
It is irritating when 9to5Mac shows old posts as if they are current. Why is MacRumors following this terrible approach?Now watch the thread get closed by the mods for "necro boosting" even though it was a mod who did it.
The Mac Pro is not for people, it’s for fairly specific high end industry needs. If someone is using it as a personal computer, it has not been a decision based on price vs. gain. The typical buyer is a company and even then it’s niche, you can get much better value from a purpose-built pc running either Windows or Linux. The mac only enters the competition when there are apps like Final Cut that only run on MacOS.
Samsung phones have been able to do that since 2017 with the Note8 and a feature called Samsung DeX. Using an HDMI adapter your phone effectively turns into a desktop computer on the fly and you use the touchscreen as a mouse or to type. You can still attach a small USB hub or a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, if desired. But you say, "I prefer MacOS"? Well, in DeX mode I can still fire up TeamViewer and remote into my Mac at home.
Last edited:
I did the same when the M2 Studio was launched.
A Mac mini Pro with the 14C/20G/16N M4 Pro SoC and 48GB of RAM is $1999.
Presuming the Mac Studio M4 Max comes out at the same $1999 base price, it will at a minimum offer 32/36GB of RAM and might even offer 48GB (though if it does, I expect a $200 higher base price) along with the same storage (512GB), faster Ethernet (a $100 option on the mini) and an M4 Max with more CPU and GPU cores. So it will continue to be the better option, overall.
But if you do not need high CPU and GPU core counts and 24GB is sufficient for your workloads, the 12C/16G Mac mini Pro will be a compelling option at a $600 lower price.
Last edited:
Surely the Mac Mini and Mac Studio should have parity?
Ie. Upgrade the Studio to M4 processors at the exact same time.
It's weird and confusing to have an inferior architecture in the higher-end product.
Ie. Upgrade the Studio to M4 processors at the exact same time.
It's weird and confusing to have an inferior architecture in the higher-end product.
My guess it is initial yields on each new generation of Max SoC, as Apple probably needs almost all of them for the MacBook Pro at launch and therefore does not have sufficient capacity for the Mac Studio and Mac Pro (especially since the Ultra needs two of them). So after ~six months when the initial rush of MBP orders have been filled and TSMC has better yields, the supply opens up to update the Mac Studio and Mac Pro to the new generation.
Where is this plentiful list of so-much-cheaper 5K monitors, exactly? (Yes, for the most performant 1:1 pixel mapping, 5K is required.)